THIS IS A CAPTION TEST. THIS IS A CAPTION TEST. THIS IS A CAPTION TEST. WE’LL RECONVENE THE SPECIAL WE’LL RECONVENE THE SPECIAL MEETING. MEETING. ANY ACTION TO REPORT OUT? ANY ACTION TO REPORT OUT? YES, ONE FINAL ACTION TO YES, ONE FINAL ACTION TO REPORT. REPORT. THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVED THE THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVED THE SETTLEMENT IN THE LAWSUIT SETTLEMENT IN THE LAWSUIT WITHOUT ADMISSION OF ANY FAULT. WITHOUT ADMISSION OF ANY FAULT. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. WE WILL ADJOURN THE SPECIAL WE WILL ADJOURN THE SPECIAL MEETING AND CALL TO ORDER THE MEETING AND CALL TO ORDER THE REGULAR MEETING A LITTLE EARLY REGULAR MEETING A LITTLE EARLY TONIGHT FOR TUESDAY, DECEMBER 9, TONIGHT FOR TUESDAY, DECEMBER 9, 2025. 2025. LEERY LEERY , RAITHEL, ROHRBOUGH, , RAITHEL, ROHRBOUGH, KOZLOWSKI AND AQUINO. KOZLOWSKI AND AQUINO. HERE. HERE. IF YOU’D ALL PLEASE RISE AND IF YOU’D ALL PLEASE RISE AND JOIN ME IN THE PLEDGE OF JOIN ME IN THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. ALLEGIANCE. I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR AMERICA AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS, ONE NATION WHICH IT STANDS, ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL. LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL. MR. CITY ATTORNEY, ANY AGENDA MR. CITY ATTORNEY, ANY AGENDA UPDATES? UPDATES? GOOD EVENING, MADAM MAYOR. GOOD EVENING, MADAM MAYOR. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TRANSMITTAL FOR ITEMS 5, 16, AND TRANSMITTAL FOR ITEMS 5, 16, AND 17. 17. A COPY HAS BEEN PREVIOUSLY A COPY HAS BEEN PREVIOUSLY PROVIDED TO YOU AND THEY ARE PROVIDED TO YOU AND THEY ARE ALSO AVAILABLE ON THE TABLE IN ALSO AVAILABLE ON THE TABLE IN THE BACK. THE BACK. OKAY, GREAT. OKAY, GREAT. THAT TAKES US TO BUSINESS FROM THAT TAKES US TO BUSINESS FROM THE FLOOR. THE FLOOR. THIS IS THE PUBLIC’S OPPORTUNITY THIS IS THE PUBLIC’S OPPORTUNITY TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL ON ITEMS TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL ON ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA. NOT ON THE AGENDA. PLEASE REMEMBER WE ARE NOT PLEASE REMEMBER WE ARE NOT ALLOWED TO TAKE ACTION OR ALLOWED TO TAKE ACTION OR DELIBERATE ON ITEMS NOT ON THE DELIBERATE ON ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA, BUT WE’RE HAPPY TO HEAR AGENDA, BUT WE’RE HAPPY TO HEAR YOUR COMMENTS. YOUR COMMENTS. IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK AT IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK AT THIS TIME OR ON ANY ITEM ON THE THIS TIME OR ON ANY ITEM ON THE AGENDA, PLEASE FILL OUT A BLUE AGENDA, PLEASE FILL OUT A BLUE SPEAKER CARD ON THE BACK TABLE SPEAKER CARD ON THE BACK TABLE AND WE WILL CALL YOU UP AT THE AND WE WILL CALL YOU UP AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME. APPROPRIATE TIME. WE DO HAVE A VERY, VERY LONG WE DO HAVE A VERY, VERY LONG MEETING AHEAD OF US, SO PLEASE MEETING AHEAD OF US, SO PLEASE RESPECT THE THREE-MINUTE TIME RESPECT THE THREE-MINUTE TIME LIMIT. LIMIT. ANY REQUESTS TO SPEAK? ANY REQUESTS TO SPEAK? WE DO HAVE ONE REQUEST TO WE DO HAVE ONE REQUEST TO SPEAK THIS EVENING FROM GARY. SPEAK THIS EVENING FROM GARY. HI, GOOD EVENING. HI, GOOD EVENING. HELLO, HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL HELLO, HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS. MEMBERS. I’M HERE TO SPEAK TO YOU ABOUT I’M HERE TO SPEAK TO YOU ABOUT THE CITY DOING A TRANSIENT THE CITY DOING A TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX RATHER THAN A OCCUPANCY TAX RATHER THAN A TOURISM BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT TOURISM BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT BUSINESS TAX. BUSINESS TAX. MY NAME IS GARY, I’M A CPA AND I MY NAME IS GARY, I’M A CPA AND I WAS AN OFFICER FOR THE NO ON G WAS AN OFFICER FOR THE NO ON G FIGHT AGAINST THE SALES TAX FIGHT AGAINST THE SALES TAX INCREASE MEASURE. INCREASE MEASURE. BEFORE YOU HOLD ALL OF THAT BEFORE YOU HOLD ALL OF THAT AGAINST ME, I SURE WISH I’D AGAINST ME, I SURE WISH I’D KNOWN ABOUT THE INCREASE KNOWN ABOUT THE INCREASE PROPOSAL THAT WAS GOING TO BE ON PROPOSAL THAT WAS GOING TO BE ON THE LAST CITY COUNCIL MEETING THE LAST CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA. AGENDA. I SURE WOULD HAVE LIKED TO I SURE WOULD HAVE LIKED TO PARTNER WITH THE PERSON THAT PARTNER WITH THE PERSON THAT SPOKE IN OPPOSITION TO THE TBID SPOKE IN OPPOSITION TO THE TBID INCREASE IN THE LAST MEETING, INCREASE IN THE LAST MEETING, THAT BEING MR. FINNEGAN, ALSO A THAT BEING MR. FINNEGAN, ALSO A CPA. CPA. HOW IRONIC. HOW IRONIC. AND HE WAS A SUPPORTER OF YES ON AND HE WAS A SUPPORTER OF YES ON G. G. HERE’S A FEW POINTS ON WHY AN HERE’S A FEW POINTS ON WHY AN ASSESSMENT IS BETTER. ASSESSMENT IS BETTER. IT’S NOT PAID BY THE RESIDENTS IT’S NOT PAID BY THE RESIDENTS OF FOLSOM. OF FOLSOM. IT GENERATES DIRECT REVENUE TO IT GENERATES DIRECT REVENUE TO OFFSET THE PROJECTED BUDGET OFFSET THE PROJECTED BUDGET DEFICIT OF THE CITY. DEFICIT OF THE CITY. WITH THE DEFICIT OF OVER WITH THE DEFICIT OF OVER $3 MILLION PER THE LAST BUDGET $3 MILLION PER THE LAST BUDGET PRESENTATION IN JUNE, A T.O.T. PRESENTATION IN JUNE, A T.O.T. COULD COVER 40% OF THAT COULD COVER 40% OF THAT SHORTFALL. SHORTFALL. PEOPLE SEEM TO SAY THAT A T.O.T. PEOPLE SEEM TO SAY THAT A T.O.T. INCREASE IN SMALL, BUT IT INCREASE IN SMALL, BUT IT WOULDN’T HAVE A SMALL IMPACT ON WOULDN’T HAVE A SMALL IMPACT ON REDUCING THE CITY’S BUDGET REDUCING THE CITY’S BUDGET DEFICIT. DEFICIT. A T.O.T. IS NOT A SPECIAL MONEY A T.O.T. IS NOT A SPECIAL MONEY INTEREST GRAB. INTEREST GRAB. A TBID IS. A TBID IS. A TOT IS A CITY REVENUE THAT A TOT IS A CITY REVENUE THAT GOES TO THE GENERAL FUND FOR GOES TO THE GENERAL FUND FOR BROAD-BASED USE AND CAN BE BROAD-BASED USE AND CAN BE FOCUSED WHERE NEEDED FROM YEAR FOCUSED WHERE NEEDED FROM YEAR TO Y YEAR BY THE CITY RATHER T. TO Y YEAR BY THE CITY RATHER T. ANY USE THE SPECIAL DISTRICT ANY USE THE SPECIAL DISTRICT WOULD PROPOSE THE CITY CAN WOULD PROPOSE THE CITY CAN ALREADY ALSO DO WITH A TOT ALREADY ALSO DO WITH A TOT INCREASE. INCREASE. TOT FUNDS ARE DIRECTLY CITY TOT FUNDS ARE DIRECTLY CITY CONTROLLED AND DON’T HAVE TO BE CONTROLLED AND DON’T HAVE TO BE NEGOTIATED FOR USE. NEGOTIATED FOR USE. A VOTE ON A TOT INCREASE WOULD A VOTE ON A TOT INCREASE WOULD PASS IN A LANDSLIDE ON A BALLOT, PASS IN A LANDSLIDE ON A BALLOT, AS IT HAS IN EVERY OTHER AS IT HAS IN EVERY OTHER JURISDICTION THAT VOTES ON ONE. JURISDICTION THAT VOTES ON ONE. IT’S AN EASY SELL TO THE PUBLIC. IT’S AN EASY SELL TO THE PUBLIC. WE PAY IT IN EVERY OTHER CITY WE PAY IT IN EVERY OTHER CITY THAT OUR FOLSOM RESIDENTS VISIT THAT OUR FOLSOM RESIDENTS VISIT A HOTEL IN. A HOTEL IN. HIGHTHE FOLSOM TBID RATE IS ALRY HIGHTHE FOLSOM TBID RATE IS ALRY ON PAR WITH OTHER LOCAL ON PAR WITH OTHER LOCAL JURISDICTIONS. JURISDICTIONS. THE TOT IS NOT. THE TOT IS NOT. THIS FOLSOM TOT HASN’T BEEN THIS FOLSOM TOT HASN’T BEEN RAISED IN OVER 40 YEARS AND IS RAISED IN OVER 40 YEARS AND IS SIGNIFICANTLY LOWER THAN THE SIGNIFICANTLY LOWER THAN THE OTHER JURISDICTIONS IN THE AREA OTHER JURISDICTIONS IN THE AREA AND IN THE STATE. AND IN THE STATE. IF A TBID IS INCREASED, THE CITY IF A TBID IS INCREASED, THE CITY IS TYING ITS HANDS AS OVERALL IS TYING ITS HANDS AS OVERALL HOTEL TAX WILL HAVE ALREADY BEEN HOTEL TAX WILL HAVE ALREADY BEEN RAISED TO SIMILAR LEVELS AS RAISED TO SIMILAR LEVELS AS OTHER LOCAL CITIES. OTHER LOCAL CITIES. THUS FROM A MARKET PERSPECTIVE, THUS FROM A MARKET PERSPECTIVE, THE CITY WON’T BE ABLE TO SEEK A THE CITY WON’T BE ABLE TO SEEK A TOT AS A SOURCE OF GENERAL FUND TOT AS A SOURCE OF GENERAL FUND REVENUE FOR THE CITY. REVENUE FOR THE CITY. GARY, I NEED YOU TO WRAP IT GARY, I NEED YOU TO WRAP IT UP, PLEASE. UP, PLEASE. I REQUEST THAT YOU TABLE AND I REQUEST THAT YOU TABLE AND WITHDRAW THE INTENT TO MOVE WITHDRAW THE INTENT TO MOVE FORWARD ON A TBID INCREASE AND FORWARD ON A TBID INCREASE AND PREPARE A REPORT FOR A TOT PREPARE A REPORT FOR A TOT INCREASE. INCREASE. BY THE WAY, YOU SAID YOU BY THE WAY, YOU SAID YOU WEREN’T AWARE IT WAS ON THE WEREN’T AWARE IT WAS ON THE AGENDA. AGENDA. DO YOU GET THE CITY CLERK’S DO YOU GET THE CITY CLERK’S E-MAILS? E-MAILS? I HAVEN’T SIGNED UP FOR THAT, I HAVEN’T SIGNED UP FOR THAT, BUT I LOOKED OCCASIONALLY, BUT I BUT I LOOKED OCCASIONALLY, BUT I WAS OUT OF TOWN. WAS OUT OF TOWN. I’M GOING TO REACH OUT TO YOU I’M GOING TO REACH OUT TO YOU AND GET YOUR E-MAIL. AND GET YOUR E-MAIL. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. EXCUSE ME, MAYOR, DO YOU MIND EXCUSE ME, MAYOR, DO YOU MIND IF I COMMENT ON THAT? IF I COMMENT ON THAT? SURE. SURE. I REALLY APPRECIATE THE I REALLY APPRECIATE THE COMMENTS SHARED ABOUT THE TOT COMMENTS SHARED ABOUT THE TOT VERSUS THE TBID. VERSUS THE TBID. ONE OF THE THINGS CONSIDERED ONE OF THE THINGS CONSIDERED FROM A STAFF PERSPECTIVE, THERE FROM A STAFF PERSPECTIVE, THERE ARE PROS AND CONS RELATED TO ARE PROS AND CONS RELATED TO EITHER OF THOSE SITUATIONS, BUT EITHER OF THOSE SITUATIONS, BUT WHAT WE DID LOOK AT IS THE WHAT WE DID LOOK AT IS THE TIMING OF THIS. TIMING OF THIS. SO IF THIS WAS AN INPERPETUITY SO IF THIS WAS AN INPERPETUITY INCREASE, I THINK STAFF WOULD INCREASE, I THINK STAFF WOULD HAVE HAD MORE OF A PAUSE IN HAVE HAD MORE OF A PAUSE IN CONSIDERING THIS OPTION, BUT THE CONSIDERING THIS OPTION, BUT THE FACT THAT IT’S GOING IN FACT THAT IT’S GOING IN ALIGNMENT WITH THE CURRENT TBID ALIGNMENT WITH THE CURRENT TBID TERM THAT THE COUNCIL WOULD HAVE TERM THAT THE COUNCIL WOULD HAVE ANOTHER BITE AT THE APPLE IN A ANOTHER BITE AT THE APPLE IN A FEW YEARS WHEN THAT EXPIRES. FEW YEARS WHEN THAT EXPIRES. STACEY, DO YOU REMEMBER, IS IT STACEY, DO YOU REMEMBER, IS IT 2032? 2032? I CAN’T REMEMBER. I CAN’T REMEMBER. GOSH, THAT SOUNDS RIGHT, BUT GOSH, THAT SOUNDS RIGHT, BUT I’M NOT — I’M NOT — SO IN SOME SENSE, IT WOULD SO IN SOME SENSE, IT WOULD GIVE US TIME OVER THE NEXT FEW GIVE US TIME OVER THE NEXT FEW YEARS IF THIS WERE TO MOVE YEARS IF THIS WERE TO MOVE FORWARD, WE WOULD — THE COUNCIL FORWARD, WE WOULD — THE COUNCIL WOULD HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO WOULD HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO REVISIT THAT. REVISIT THAT. SO ANYWAY, BUT I WOULD ALSO SO ANYWAY, BUT I WOULD ALSO WELCOME THE OPPORTUNITY TO MEET WELCOME THE OPPORTUNITY TO MEET WITH YOU TO KIND OF SHARE MORE WITH YOU TO KIND OF SHARE MORE BACKGROUND AND LEARN MORE ABOUT BACKGROUND AND LEARN MORE ABOUT WHAT YOU’RE SHARING. WHAT YOU’RE SHARING. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHTY, THANK YOU VERY ALL RIGHTY, THANK YOU VERY MUCH. MUCH. THAT TAKES US TO OUR CONSENT THAT TAKES US TO OUR CONSENT CALENDAR. CALENDAR. IS THERE ANYTHING THAT ANYBODY IS THERE ANYTHING THAT ANYBODY WANTS TO PULL, ANY REQUESTS TO WANTS TO PULL, ANY REQUESTS TO SPEAK FROM ANYONE? SPEAK FROM ANYONE? NO REQUESTS FROM THE PUBLIC NO REQUESTS FROM THE PUBLIC TO SPEAK ON CONSENT ITEMS. TO SPEAK ON CONSENT ITEMS. WAS THERE ANYTHING ANYBODY WAS THERE ANYTHING ANYBODY WANTED TO PULL? WANTED TO PULL? I’LL MOVE THE CONSENT I’LL MOVE THE CONSENT CALENDAR IN TOTAL. CALENDAR IN TOTAL. SECOND. SECOND. WE HAVE A MOTION AND A WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. SECOND. LEERY LEERY RAITHEL, ROHRBOUGH, RAITHEL, ROHRBOUGH, KOZLOWSKI, AND AQUINO? KOZLOWSKI, AND AQUINO? YES. YES. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. YOUR FIRST PUBLIC HEARING IS YOUR FIRST PUBLIC HEARING IS ORDINANCE NUMBER 1359. ORDINANCE NUMBER 1359. ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS OF ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS OF CHAPTER 17 REGARDING CHAPTER 17 REGARDING INCLUSIONARY HOUSING FOR INCLUSIONARY HOUSING FOR CALCULATING INLIEU FEES CALCULATING INLIEU FEES APPLICABLE TO RESIDENTIAL APPLICABLE TO RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AND TO INCORPORATE DEVELOPMENT AND TO INCORPORATE NON-SUBSTANTIVE CLEANUP IN NON-SUBSTANTIVE CLEANUP IN DETERMINING THE PROJECT IS DETERMINING THE PROJECT IS EXEMPT FROM CEQA. EXEMPT FROM CEQA. THIS WILL BE INTRODUCTION AND THIS WILL BE INTRODUCTION AND FIRST READING OF THE ORDINANCE. FIRST READING OF THE ORDINANCE. THANK YOU, GOOD EVENING, THANK YOU, GOOD EVENING, DESMOND. DESMOND. I’M GOING TO ASK MY COLLEAGUES I’M GOING TO ASK MY COLLEAGUES IF WE CAN ALL MAYBE AGREE IF WE CAN ALL MAYBE AGREE TONIGHT TO DO OUR BEST TO HOLD TONIGHT TO DO OUR BEST TO HOLD OUR QUESTIONS UNTIL THE END OF OUR QUESTIONS UNTIL THE END OF EVERY PRESENTATION JUST SO WE EVERY PRESENTATION JUST SO WE CAN GET THROUGH THIS LARGE CAN GET THROUGH THIS LARGE AGENDA AS EXPEDITIOUSLY AS AGENDA AS EXPEDITIOUSLY AS POSSIBLE. POSSIBLE. TAKE IT AWAY, DESMOND. TAKE IT AWAY, DESMOND. MAYOR AQUINO, MEMBER OF THE MAYOR AQUINO, MEMBER OF THE CITY COUNCIL, I’M THE PLANNING CITY COUNCIL, I’M THE PLANNING MANAGER IN THE COMMUNITY MANAGER IN THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. I’M HERE BEFORE YOU TONIGHT TO I’M HERE BEFORE YOU TONIGHT TO TALK ABOUT PROPOSED CHANGES TO TALK ABOUT PROPOSED CHANGES TO THE INCLUSIONARY HOUSING THE INCLUSIONARY HOUSING ORDINANCE AND THE INCLUSIONARY ORDINANCE AND THE INCLUSIONARY HOUSING IN LIEU FEE STUDY HOUSING IN LIEU FEE STUDY PREPARED BY ECONOMIC AND PREPARED BY ECONOMIC AND PLANNING SYSTEMS FOR THE CITY. PLANNING SYSTEMS FOR THE CITY. AMY LA PIN, WHO IS THE SENIOR AMY LA PIN, WHO IS THE SENIOR PRINCIPAL WITH ECONOMIC AND PRINCIPAL WITH ECONOMIC AND PLANNING SYSTEMS IS HERE TONIGHT PLANNING SYSTEMS IS HERE TONIGHT AND WILL BE JOINING ME IN THIS AND WILL BE JOINING ME IN THIS PRESENTATION. PRESENTATION. IN TERMS OF THE PRESENTATION, IN TERMS OF THE PRESENTATION, WE’RE GOING TO TALK ABOUT THE WE’RE GOING TO TALK ABOUT THE OVERALL PROJECT CONTEXT, WHY WE OVERALL PROJECT CONTEXT, WHY WE OPTED TO DO A FEE METHODOLOGY OPTED TO DO A FEE METHODOLOGY FOR THE KEY FINDINGS AND RESULTS FOR THE KEY FINDINGS AND RESULTS FROM THAT AS WELL AS SOME FROM THAT AS WELL AS SOME ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES THAT WERE ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES THAT WERE CONSIDERED BASED ON FEEDBACK CONSIDERED BASED ON FEEDBACK THAT WE RECEIVED. THAT WE RECEIVED. AND THEN NEXT STEPS AND STAFF’S AND THEN NEXT STEPS AND STAFF’S RECOMMENDATIONS. RECOMMENDATIONS. SO IN TERMS OF THE CONTEXT, THE SO IN TERMS OF THE CONTEXT, THE CITY’S HOUSING REQUIRED US IN CITY’S HOUSING REQUIRED US IN PROGRAM H9 TO UPDATE OUR PROGRAM H9 TO UPDATE OUR INCLUSIONARY ORDINANCE. INCLUSIONARY ORDINANCE. ESSENTIALLY TO DO A STUDY OF OUR ESSENTIALLY TO DO A STUDY OF OUR INCLUSIONARY HOUSING FEES TO INCLUSIONARY HOUSING FEES TO EVALUATE THE FEE LEVELS, LOOK AT EVALUATE THE FEE LEVELS, LOOK AT FUNDING GAPS AND IMPROVE OUR FUNDING GAPS AND IMPROVE OUR OVERALL IN LIEU FEE METHODOLOGY. OVERALL IN LIEU FEE METHODOLOGY. SO AS I MENTIONED, WE HIRED SO AS I MENTIONED, WE HIRED ECONOMIC AND PLANNING SYSTEMS TO ECONOMIC AND PLANNING SYSTEMS TO DO A COMPREHENSIVE STUDY OF THE DO A COMPREHENSIVE STUDY OF THE ORDINANCE AND OUR FEES. ORDINANCE AND OUR FEES. ONE OF THE MAIN DRIVERS BEHIND ONE OF THE MAIN DRIVERS BEHIND THIS WAS THE SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT THIS WAS THE SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF STAFF TIME THAT GOES INTO OF STAFF TIME THAT GOES INTO CALCULATING THE INLIEU FEES. CALCULATING THE INLIEU FEES. THEY’RE BASED ON 1% OF THE SALES THEY’RE BASED ON 1% OF THE SALES PRICE. PRICE. NOW, ONE WOULD THINK THAT’S NOW, ONE WOULD THINK THAT’S FAIRLY STRAIGHTFORWARD, BUT THE FAIRLY STRAIGHTFORWARD, BUT THE REALITY IS WHEN FOLKS PULL THEIR REALITY IS WHEN FOLKS PULL THEIR BUILDING PERMITS, DEVELOPERS BUILDING PERMITS, DEVELOPERS OFTEN DON’T YET KNOW THE PRICE OFTEN DON’T YET KNOW THE PRICE OF THE HOMES, BECAUSE THEY’RE OF THE HOMES, BECAUSE THEY’RE JUST ABOUT TO START CONSTRUCTION JUST ABOUT TO START CONSTRUCTION ON THEIR MODEL HOMES. ON THEIR MODEL HOMES. SO AS A RESULT, WE HAVE TO GET A SO AS A RESULT, WE HAVE TO GET A MARKET STUDY. MARKET STUDY. WE HAVE TO EVALUATE THAT MARKET WE HAVE TO EVALUATE THAT MARKET STUDY, MAKE SURE THAT THE PRICES STUDY, MAKE SURE THAT THE PRICES ARE CONSISTENT WITH WHAT THEY ARE CONSISTENT WITH WHAT THEY SHOULD BE FOR OUR AREA. SHOULD BE FOR OUR AREA. AND THEN WE HAVE TO MANUALLY AND THEN WE HAVE TO MANUALLY ENTER THOSE FEES INTO EACH ENTER THOSE FEES INTO EACH BUILDING PERMIT, BECAUSE THEY BUILDING PERMIT, BECAUSE THEY VARY BY SUBDIVISION. VARY BY SUBDIVISION. IN ADDITION, WE HAVE TO ANNUALLY IN ADDITION, WE HAVE TO ANNUALLY CHECK THOSE FEES EVERY JANUARY CHECK THOSE FEES EVERY JANUARY TO MAKE SURE — THE SALES PRICES TO MAKE SURE — THE SALES PRICES EVERY JANUARY — TO MAKE SURE EVERY JANUARY — TO MAKE SURE THEY HAVEN’T GONE ■UPORDOWNBY THEY HAVEN’T GONE ■UPORDOWNBY MORE THAN 10% RESULTING IN A MORE THAN 10% RESULTING IN A CHANGE TO THE INCLUSIONARY FEE. CHANGE TO THE INCLUSIONARY FEE. RIGHT NOW, WE CURRENTLY HAVE RIGHT NOW, WE CURRENTLY HAVE ABOUT 75 DIFFERENT INCLUSIONARY ABOUT 75 DIFFERENT INCLUSIONARY FEES DEPENDING ON — COVERING FEES DEPENDING ON — COVERING ALL THE DIFFERENT SUBDIVISIONS ALL THE DIFFERENT SUBDIVISIONS THROUGHOUT THE CITY. THROUGHOUT THE CITY. SO THE PROPOSED IN-LIEU FEE SO THE PROPOSED IN-LIEU FEE METHODOLOGY USES A NEXUS STUDY. METHODOLOGY USES A NEXUS STUDY. WE’RE NOT REQUIRED TO DO A NEXUS WE’RE NOT REQUIRED TO DO A NEXUS STUDY. STUDY. THOSE ARE FOR IMPACT FEES. THOSE ARE FOR IMPACT FEES. THIS IS WHAT’S CALLED AN IN-LIEU THIS IS WHAT’S CALLED AN IN-LIEU FEE, YOU’RE PAYING THIS FEE IN FEE, YOU’RE PAYING THIS FEE IN LIEU OF ACTUALLY CONSTRUCTING LIEU OF ACTUALLY CONSTRUCTING THE AFFORDABLE AND THE AFFORDABLE AND DEED-RESTRICTED HOMES. DEED-RESTRICTED HOMES. BUT IT GIVES US A MUCH STRONGER BUT IT GIVES US A MUCH STRONGER LEGAL STANDING IF WE CAN POINT LEGAL STANDING IF WE CAN POINT TO A NEXUS STUDY THAT WE’VE DONE TO A NEXUS STUDY THAT WE’VE DONE THAT ANALYSIS. THAT ANALYSIS. THIS APPROACH SIMPLIFIES THIS APPROACH SIMPLIFIES SIGNIFICANTLY THE ADMINISTRATIVE SIGNIFICANTLY THE ADMINISTRATIVE WORK THAT STAFF HAS TO DO, WORK THAT STAFF HAS TO DO, BECAUSE IT BASES IT ON A PER BECAUSE IT BASES IT ON A PER SQUARE FOOT — IT SETS THE FEE SQUARE FOOT — IT SETS THE FEE ON A PER SQ SQUARE FOOT BASIS. ON A PER SQ SQUARE FOOT BASIS. AND AGAIN, WE’RE NOT PROPOSING AND AGAIN, WE’RE NOT PROPOSING TO SIGNIFICANTLY CHANGE THE FEE, TO SIGNIFICANTLY CHANGE THE FEE, BUT REALLY TO REDUCE THE BUT REALLY TO REDUCE THE ADMINISTRATIVE BURDEN AND WE’LL ADMINISTRATIVE BURDEN AND WE’LL TALK ABOUT HOW THAT FEE IS TALK ABOUT HOW THAT FEE IS CALCULATED IN JUST A FEW CALCULATED IN JUST A FEW MOMENTS. MOMENTS. WE’RE ALSO PROPOSING SOME WE’RE ALSO PROPOSING SOME AMENDMENTS TO TITLE AMENDMENTS TO TITLE XVII SPECIFICALLY RELATED TO THE XVII SPECIFICALLY RELATED TO THE INCLUSIONARY HOUSING ORDINANCE INCLUSIONARY HOUSING ORDINANCE TO REMOVE OUTDATED REFERENCES. TO REMOVE OUTDATED REFERENCES. REFERENCES TO OUR REDEVELOPMENT REFERENCES TO OUR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FOR EXAMPLE, TO IMPROVE AGENCY, FOR EXAMPLE, TO IMPROVE CLARITY AND ADMINISTRATIVE CLARITY AND ADMINISTRATIVE CONSISTENCY AND THEN MAKE SURE CONSISTENCY AND THEN MAKE SURE THAT IT’S UP TO DATE WITH STATE THAT IT’S UP TO DATE WITH STATE LAW, BECAUSE WE REFERENCE LAW, BECAUSE WE REFERENCE DENSITY BONUS AND DENSITY BONUS DENSITY BONUS AND DENSITY BONUS LAW HAS CHANGED. LAW HAS CHANGED. SO AGAIN, THE IDEA HERE IS TO SO AGAIN, THE IDEA HERE IS TO MAKE THIS SIMPLIFIED FOR STAFF MAKE THIS SIMPLIFIED FOR STAFF AND THE DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY AND THE DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY BECAUSE THEY WILL KNOW GOING BECAUSE THEY WILL KNOW GOING INTO THIS EXACTLY WHAT THEIR FEE INTO THIS EXACTLY WHAT THEIR FEE WOULD BE PRIOR TO EVEN WOULD BE PRIOR TO EVEN SUBMITTING FOR A BUILDING SUBMITTING FOR A BUILDING PERMIT. PERMIT. SO IT PROVIDES THAT KIND OF SO IT PROVIDES THAT KIND OF UP-FRONT CLARITY. UP-FRONT CLARITY. AND THEN WE’RE PROPOSING TO HAVE AND THEN WE’RE PROPOSING TO HAVE IT ADJUST WITH THE MARKET BASED IT ADJUST WITH THE MARKET BASED ON THE CONSTRUCTION COST INDEX. ON THE CONSTRUCTION COST INDEX. IF THE CONSTRUCTION COSTS IF THE CONSTRUCTION COSTS INCREASE, WHICH MEANS IT’S GOING INCREASE, WHICH MEANS IT’S GOING TO BE MORE EXPENSIVE FOR US TO TO BE MORE EXPENSIVE FOR US TO HELP DO GAP FINANCING ON AN HELP DO GAP FINANCING ON AN AFFORDABLE PROJECT, THEN THE FEE AFFORDABLE PROJECT, THEN THE FEE GOES UP. GOES UP. IF CONSTRUCTION COSTS GO DOWN, IF CONSTRUCTION COSTS GO DOWN, THEN THE FEE GOES DOWN. THEN THE FEE GOES DOWN. WE DID A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF WE DID A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF PUBLIC OUTREACH ON THIS EFFORT. PUBLIC OUTREACH ON THIS EFFORT. WE HAD A WORKSHOP WITH THE WE HAD A WORKSHOP WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION ON SEPTEMBE. PLANNING COMMISSION ON SEPTEMBE. WE ALSO, OF COURSE, WENT BACK TO WE ALSO, OF COURSE, WENT BACK TO THEM AND THEY MADE A UNANIMOUS THEM AND THEY MADE A UNANIMOUS RECOMMENDATION TO RECOMMENDING RECOMMENDATION TO RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THIS. APPROVAL OF THIS. WE ALSO SENT OUT HUNDREDS OF WE ALSO SENT OUT HUNDREDS OF EMAILS TO FOLSOM DEVELOPERS, EMAILS TO FOLSOM DEVELOPERS, RESIDENTS, AND BUSINESSES. RESIDENTS, AND BUSINESSES. WE HAD THREE DIFFERENT SEPARATE WE HAD THREE DIFFERENT SEPARATE MEETINGS WITH THE NORTH STATE MEETINGS WITH THE NORTH STATE BUILDING INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION OR BUILDING INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION OR BIA AND TWO MEETINGS AND OFFERED BIA AND TWO MEETINGS AND OFFERED A THIRD WITH THE SACRAMENTO A THIRD WITH THE SACRAMENTO HOUSING ALLIANCE AND LEGAL HOUSING ALLIANCE AND LEGAL SERVICES OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA. SERVICES OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA. AND THEN WE’VE PUT ALL THIS AND THEN WE’VE PUT ALL THIS INFORMATION UP ON A DEDICATED INFORMATION UP ON A DEDICATED WEB PAGE ON THE CITY’S WEBSITE. WEB PAGE ON THE CITY’S WEBSITE. SO I’M GOING TO TURN IT OVER TO SO I’M GOING TO TURN IT OVER TO AMY AND SHE’S GOING TO WALK YOU AMY AND SHE’S GOING TO WALK YOU THROUGH HOW THE RESULTS OF THE THROUGH HOW THE RESULTS OF THE STUDY AND HOW THE FEE LEVELS ARE STUDY AND HOW THE FEE LEVELS ARE CALCULATED. CALCULATED. AMY? AMY? GOOD EVENING, AMY. GOOD EVENING, AMY. THANK YOU, DESMOND. THANK YOU, DESMOND. GOOD EVENING, MAYOR, COUNCIL GOOD EVENING, MAYOR, COUNCIL MEMBERS. MEMBERS. MY NAME IS AMY LAPIN AND I’M A MY NAME IS AMY LAPIN AND I’M A PRINCIPAL WITH ECONOMIC AND PRINCIPAL WITH ECONOMIC AND PLANNING SYSTEMS BASED OUT OF PLANNING SYSTEMS BASED OUT OF SACRAMENTO. SACRAMENTO. SO TONIGHT I’M GOING TO WALK SO TONIGHT I’M GOING TO WALK THROUGH THE METHODOLOGY AND KEY THROUGH THE METHODOLOGY AND KEY FINDINGS RELATED TO THE FINDINGS RELATED TO THE RECOMMENDED UPDATE TO THE CITY’S RECOMMENDED UPDATE TO THE CITY’S INCLUSIONARY HOUSING IN-LIEU INCLUSIONARY HOUSING IN-LIEU FEE. FEE. THE PURPOSE OF THIS EFFORT WAS THE PURPOSE OF THIS EFFORT WAS TO STREAMLINE THE CITY’S FEE TO STREAMLINE THE CITY’S FEE STRUCTURE, IMPROVE TRANSPARENCY STRUCTURE, IMPROVE TRANSPARENCY AND CONSISTENCY, AND CREATE A AND CONSISTENCY, AND CREATE A MORE PREDICTIVE, EASIER TO MORE PREDICTIVE, EASIER TO ADMINISTER SYSTEM THAT ALIGNS ADMINISTER SYSTEM THAT ALIGNS WITH THE CITY’S LONG-TERM WITH THE CITY’S LONG-TERM AFFORDABLE HOUSING GOALS. AFFORDABLE HOUSING GOALS. SO THE METHODOLOGY DOES FOLLOW A SO THE METHODOLOGY DOES FOLLOW A NEXUS-BASED ASSEMBLY BILL AB NEXUS-BASED ASSEMBLY BILL AB 1600, DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE 1600, DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE METHODOLOGY, AS DESMOND METHODOLOGY, AS DESMOND MENTIONED, TO PROVIDE A STRONGER MENTIONED, TO PROVIDE A STRONGER LEGAL BACKING TO THE FEE LEGAL BACKING TO THE FEE STRUCTURE. STRUCTURE. THERE ARE THREE DISTINCT STEPS. THERE ARE THREE DISTINCT STEPS. THE FIRST BEING TO DETERMINE THE THE FIRST BEING TO DETERMINE THE AFFORDABILITY GAP, QUANTIFYING AFFORDABILITY GAP, QUANTIFYING AFFORDABILITY GAPS OR THE AFFORDABILITY GAPS OR THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE COSTS TO DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE COSTS TO DEVELOP AFFORDABLE UNITS AND DEVELOP AFFORDABLE UNITS AND WHAT INCOME-QUALIFIED HOUSEHOLDS WHAT INCOME-QUALIFIED HOUSEHOLDS CAN SUPPORT. CAN SUPPORT. THE SECOND STEP IS TO ESTIMATE THE SECOND STEP IS TO ESTIMATE WORKER HOUSEHOLDS GENERATED BY WORKER HOUSEHOLDS GENERATED BY NEW MARKET-RATE UNITS SPENDING NEW MARKET-RATE UNITS SPENDING BASED ON CONSUMER SPENDING BASED ON CONSUMER SPENDING PATTERNS AND EMPLOYMENT PATTERNS AND EMPLOYMENT PATTERNS. PATTERNS. AND THREE, COMBINING THESE AND THREE, COMBINING THESE FACTORS TO CALCULATE THE MAXIMUM FACTORS TO CALCULATE THE MAXIMUM LEGALLY JUSTIFIABLE FEE FOR EACH LEGALLY JUSTIFIABLE FEE FOR EACH IDENTIFIED HOUSING PROTOTYPE. IDENTIFIED HOUSING PROTOTYPE. SO I’M GOING TO DIVE IN A LITTLE SO I’M GOING TO DIVE IN A LITTLE BIT, AND WE’LL BE AVAILABLE BIT, AND WE’LL BE AVAILABLE AFTER THE PRESENTATION TO ANSWER AFTER THE PRESENTATION TO ANSWER MORE DETAILED QUESTIONS. MORE DETAILED QUESTIONS. SO FOR THE STUDY, WE DEVELOPED SO FOR THE STUDY, WE DEVELOPED COST ESTIMATES FOR FOUR COST ESTIMATES FOR FOUR REPRESENTATIVE PROTOTYPES ACTIVE REPRESENTATIVE PROTOTYPES ACTIVE IN FOLSOM TODAY. IN FOLSOM TODAY. LOW AND MEDIUM DENSITY SINGLE LOW AND MEDIUM DENSITY SINGLE FAMILY HOMES, ATTACHED OWNERSHIP FAMILY HOMES, ATTACHED OWNERSHIP PRODUCTS SUCH AS CONDOS AND PRODUCTS SUCH AS CONDOS AND TOWNHOMES, AND MULTI-FAMILY TOWNHOMES, AND MULTI-FAMILY RENTAL APARTMENTS. RENTAL APARTMENTS. FOR EACH, WE ESTIMATED FOR EACH, WE ESTIMATED DEVELOPMENT COSTS AND COMPARED DEVELOPMENT COSTS AND COMPARED THEM TO WHAT VERY LOW, LOW, AND THEM TO WHAT VERY LOW, LOW, AND MODERATE INCOME HOUSEHOLDS CAN MODERATE INCOME HOUSEHOLDS CAN AFFORD UNDER EACH CD OR THE AFFORD UNDER EACH CD OR THE DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND HUD OR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND HUD OR THE DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND THE DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES. URBAN DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES. ACROSS ALL PROTOTYPES, ACROSS ALL PROTOTYPES, AFFORDABLE PURCHASE PRICES OR AFFORDABLE PURCHASE PRICES OR RENTS FELL SIGNIFICANTLY BELOW RENTS FELL SIGNIFICANTLY BELOW DEVELOPMENT COSTS ESTABLISHING DEVELOPMENT COSTS ESTABLISHING SUBSTANTIAL AFFORDABILITY GAPS. SUBSTANTIAL AFFORDABILITY GAPS. AND THOSE ARE SHOWN HERE ON THIS AND THOSE ARE SHOWN HERE ON THIS SLIDE. SLIDE. YOU CAN SEE THE GAPS BETWEEN THE YOU CAN SEE THE GAPS BETWEEN THE SUPPORTABLE UNIT VALUE FOR EACH SUPPORTABLE UNIT VALUE FOR EACH OF THE FOUR PROTOTYPES AND THE OF THE FOUR PROTOTYPES AND THE DEVELOPMENT COSTS UNDER THE DEVELOPMENT COSTS UNDER THE INCOME HOUSEHOLD INCOME INCOME HOUSEHOLD INCOME STANDARDS FOR SACRAMENTO COUNTY, STANDARDS FOR SACRAMENTO COUNTY, UNDER THE VERY LOW, LOW, AND UNDER THE VERY LOW, LOW, AND MODERATE INCOME CATEGORIES. MODERATE INCOME CATEGORIES. THE NEXT STEP IS TO DETERMINE THE NEXT STEP IS TO DETERMINE AFFORDABLE HOUSING DEMAND. AFFORDABLE HOUSING DEMAND. THIS STEP ESTIMATES THE NUMBER THIS STEP ESTIMATES THE NUMBER OF INCOME ELIGIBLE WORKER OF INCOME ELIGIBLE WORKER HOUSEHOLDS ASSOCIATED WITH A NEW HOUSEHOLDS ASSOCIATED WITH A NEW DEVELOPMENT, SO NEW RESIDENTS DEVELOPMENT, SO NEW RESIDENTS SUPPORT LOCAL EMPLOYMENT IN SUPPORT LOCAL EMPLOYMENT IN RETAIL, SERVICES, RESTAURANTS, RETAIL, SERVICES, RESTAURANTS, HEALTH CARE, AND OTHER HEALTH CARE, AND OTHER INDUSTRIES. INDUSTRIES. MANY OF THESE WORKERS FALL INTO MANY OF THESE WORKERS FALL INTO THE INCOME CATEGORIES IDENTIFIED THE INCOME CATEGORIES IDENTIFIED BY AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROGRAMS. BY AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROGRAMS. BY LINKING TYPICAL HOUSEHOLD BY LINKING TYPICAL HOUSEHOLD SPENDING TO LOCAL JOB CREATION, SPENDING TO LOCAL JOB CREATION, THE ANALYSIS QUANTIFIES THE THE ANALYSIS QUANTIFIES THE NUMBER OF VERY LOW TO MODERATE NUMBER OF VERY LOW TO MODERATE INCOME WORKER HOUSEHOLDS INCOME WORKER HOUSEHOLDS ATTRIBUTABLE TO EACH OF THE FOUR ATTRIBUTABLE TO EACH OF THE FOUR HOUSING PROTOTYPES AND THIS HOUSING PROTOTYPES AND THIS FORMS THE DEMAND SIDE OF THE FORMS THE DEMAND SIDE OF THE NEXUS EQUATION. NEXUS EQUATION. SO THIS NEXT SLIDE PROVIDES A SO THIS NEXT SLIDE PROVIDES A WALK-THROUGH BETWEEN WHAT THE WALK-THROUGH BETWEEN WHAT THE AVERAGE SALES PRICE IS, THE AVERAGE SALES PRICE IS, THE HOUSEHOLD INCOME REQUIRED TO HOUSEHOLD INCOME REQUIRED TO PURCHASE THAT, AND THEN BASED ON PURCHASE THAT, AND THEN BASED ON SPENDING PATTERNS AND EMPLOYMENT SPENDING PATTERNS AND EMPLOYMENT PATTERNS, HOW MANY TOTAL WORKER PATTERNS, HOW MANY TOTAL WORKER HOUSEHOLDS ARE GENERATED PER 100 HOUSEHOLDS ARE GENERATED PER 100 MARKET-RATE UNITS. MARKET-RATE UNITS. AND THEN THOSE ARE THEN AND THEN THOSE ARE THEN DISTRIBUTED BY INCOME CATEGORY. DISTRIBUTED BY INCOME CATEGORY. BASED ON TYPICAL WAGE BASED ON TYPICAL WAGE STRUCTURES. STRUCTURES. SO THEN THE FINAL STEP IS SO THEN THE FINAL STEP IS COMBINING THE AFFORDABILITY GAPS COMBINING THE AFFORDABILITY GAPS FROM STEP ONE WITH THE NUMBER OF FROM STEP ONE WITH THE NUMBER OF WORKER HOUSEHOLDS FROM STEP TWO WORKER HOUSEHOLDS FROM STEP TWO TO COMPUTE THE MAXIMUM TO COMPUTE THE MAXIMUM SUPPORTIVE IN-LIEU FEE. SUPPORTIVE IN-LIEU FEE. WE CALCULATED THE TOTAL SUBSIDY WE CALCULATED THE TOTAL SUBSIDY REQUIRED TO SUPPORT AFFORDABLE REQUIRED TO SUPPORT AFFORDABLE UNITS NEEDED FOR EACH PROTOTYPE UNITS NEEDED FOR EACH PROTOTYPE AND THEN DIVIDED BY THE AVERAGE AND THEN DIVIDED BY THE AVERAGE PROTOTYPE SQUARE FOOTAGE TO PROTOTYPE SQUARE FOOTAGE TO YIELD A MAXIMUM PER SQUARE FOOT YIELD A MAXIMUM PER SQUARE FOOT FEE. FEE. AND THIS SLIDE SHOWS THE AND THIS SLIDE SHOWS THE EXISTING EXAMPLE, BECAUSE THE EXISTING EXAMPLE, BECAUSE THE EXISTING IN-LIEU FEE IS NOT EXISTING IN-LIEU FEE IS NOT CALCULATED ON A PER SQUARE FOOT CALCULATED ON A PER SQUARE FOOT BASIS AS DESMOND DISCUSSED, SO BASIS AS DESMOND DISCUSSED, SO WE JUST USED AN EXAMPLE AND WE JUST USED AN EXAMPLE AND CALCULATED THE PER UNIT AND PER CALCULATED THE PER UNIT AND PER SQUARE FOOT BASIS FOR EACH OF SQUARE FOOT BASIS FOR EACH OF THE FOUR PROTOTYPES. THE FOUR PROTOTYPES. THE UPDATED MAXIMUM, WHICH YOU THE UPDATED MAXIMUM, WHICH YOU CAN SEE IS EXTREMELY HIGH, BOTH CAN SEE IS EXTREMELY HIGH, BOTH ON A PER SQUARE FOOT BASIS AND ON A PER SQUARE FOOT BASIS AND IF WE WERE TO TRANSLATE THAT IF WE WERE TO TRANSLATE THAT INTO A PER UNIT EXAMPLE. INTO A PER UNIT EXAMPLE. AND THEN OUR RECOMMENDED, AND THEN OUR RECOMMENDED, UPDATED IN-LIEU FEE, WHICH IS UPDATED IN-LIEU FEE, WHICH IS ABOUT 10% OR LESS OF THE MAXIMUM ABOUT 10% OR LESS OF THE MAXIMUM JUSTIFIABLE FEE. JUSTIFIABLE FEE. AND IT EQUATES TO SIMILAR TO OR AND IT EQUATES TO SIMILAR TO OR ACTUALLY IN SOME CASES FOR THESE ACTUALLY IN SOME CASES FOR THESE PROTOTYPES THAT WE IDENTIFIED PROTOTYPES THAT WE IDENTIFIED LESS THAN THE AVERAGE IN-LIEU LESS THAN THE AVERAGE IN-LIEU FEE CURRENTLY BEING ASSESSED BY FEE CURRENTLY BEING ASSESSED BY THE CITY. THE CITY. SO YOU CAN SEE FOR SINGLE SO YOU CAN SEE FOR SINGLE FAMILY, LOW, AND MEDIUM DENSITY, FAMILY, LOW, AND MEDIUM DENSITY, OUR RECOMMENDED IN-LIEU FEE IS OUR RECOMMENDED IN-LIEU FEE IS $3 PER SQUARE FOOT. $3 PER SQUARE FOOT. THE MULTI-FAMILY ATTACHED THE MULTI-FAMILY ATTACHED PRODUCT WOULD BE 2.50 A SQUARE PRODUCT WOULD BE 2.50 A SQUARE FOOT AND THEN YOU’LL NOTE THAT FOOT AND THEN YOU’LL NOTE THAT THE MULTI-FAMILY APARTMENTS, THE MULTI-FAMILY APARTMENTS, ALTHOUGH A MAXIMUM JUSTIFIABLE ALTHOUGH A MAXIMUM JUSTIFIABLE FEE WAS CALCULATED, WE RECOMMEND FEE WAS CALCULATED, WE RECOMMEND CONTINUATION OF EXEMPTING THIS CONTINUATION OF EXEMPTING THIS PRODUCT TYPE AS IT’S CONSISTENT PRODUCT TYPE AS IT’S CONSISTENT WITH THE CURRENT APPROACH IN THE WITH THE CURRENT APPROACH IN THE CITY. CITY. AND I’LL GET TO WHY IN A SECOND. AND I’LL GET TO WHY IN A SECOND. SO A LARGE PART OF THIS STUDY SO A LARGE PART OF THIS STUDY WAS EXAMINING FINANCIAL WAS EXAMINING FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY. FEASIBILITY. WE WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT WE WE WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT WE DIDN’T INHIBIT THE DEVELOPMENT DIDN’T INHIBIT THE DEVELOPMENT OF MARKET-RATE HOUSING BUT STILL OF MARKET-RATE HOUSING BUT STILL GENERATED REVENUE FOR THE CITY’S GENERATED REVENUE FOR THE CITY’S AFFORDABLE HOUSING GOALS. AFFORDABLE HOUSING GOALS. SO UNDER THE EXISTING IN-LIEU SO UNDER THE EXISTING IN-LIEU FEE, YOU CAN SEE THAT THE SINGLE FEE, YOU CAN SEE THAT THE SINGLE FAMILY LOW AND MEDIUM DENSITY FAMILY LOW AND MEDIUM DENSITY PROTOTYPES APPEAR TO BE PROTOTYPES APPEAR TO BE FEASIBLE. FEASIBLE. THE MULTI-FAMILY ATTACHED, SO THE MULTI-FAMILY ATTACHED, SO THIS IS A MULTI-FAMILY OWNERSHIP THIS IS A MULTI-FAMILY OWNERSHIP PRODUCT, IS ON THE MARGINS. PRODUCT, IS ON THE MARGINS. IT’S SHOWING AS SLIGHTLY IT’S SHOWING AS SLIGHTLY NEGATIVE, BUT THAT’S ESSENTIALLY NEGATIVE, BUT THAT’S ESSENTIALLY A BREAK-EVEN FINDING. A BREAK-EVEN FINDING. AND THEN THE MULTI-FAMILY AND THEN THE MULTI-FAMILY APARTMENTS, EVEN WITHOUT AN APARTMENTS, EVEN WITHOUT AN EXISTING IN-LIEU FEE, SO THE EXISTING IN-LIEU FEE, SO THE FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS EXAMINES FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS EXAMINES EXISTING CONDITIONS WHICH AS EXISTING CONDITIONS WHICH AS MENTIONED IS MULTI-FAMILY RENTAL MENTIONED IS MULTI-FAMILY RENTAL APARTMENTS THAT ARE CURRENTLY APARTMENTS THAT ARE CURRENTLY EXEMPT, SO EVEN WITHOUT THAT, EXEMPT, SO EVEN WITHOUT THAT, IT’S SHOWING THAT THERE ARE SOME IT’S SHOWING THAT THERE ARE SOME FEASIBILITY CHALLENGES. FEASIBILITY CHALLENGES. SO CLEARLY UNDER THE UPDATED SO CLEARLY UNDER THE UPDATED MAXIMUM IN-LIEU FEE, EVERY MAXIMUM IN-LIEU FEE, EVERY SINGLE PROTOTYPE WOULD SINGLE PROTOTYPE WOULD EXPERIENCE FEASIBILITY EXPERIENCE FEASIBILITY CHALLENGES. CHALLENGES. SO BASED ON THAT AND BASED ON SO BASED ON THAT AND BASED ON DISCUSSIONS WITH STAFF ABOUT DISCUSSIONS WITH STAFF ABOUT MAINTAINING SIMILAR FEE MAINTAINING SIMILAR FEE THRESHOLDS, OUR RECOMMENDATION THRESHOLDS, OUR RECOMMENDATION IS TO MAINTAIN A SIMILAR FEE PER IS TO MAINTAIN A SIMILAR FEE PER SQUARE FOOT. SQUARE FOOT. FOR THE THREE PROTOTYPES IN FOR THE THREE PROTOTYPES IN WHICH THE CITY CURRENTLY APPLIES WHICH THE CITY CURRENTLY APPLIES AN IN-LIEU FEE, SO THE TWO AN IN-LIEU FEE, SO THE TWO SINGLE FAMILY OWNERSHIP PRODUCTS SINGLE FAMILY OWNERSHIP PRODUCTS AND THE ONE MULTI-FAMILY AND THE ONE MULTI-FAMILY OWNERSHIP PRODUCT. OWNERSHIP PRODUCT. AND THEN TO AGAIN RETAIN THAT AND THEN TO AGAIN RETAIN THAT EXEMPTION ON MULTI-FAMILY RENTAL EXEMPTION ON MULTI-FAMILY RENTAL PRODUCTS. PRODUCTS. SO YOU CAN SEE IN THE FAR SO YOU CAN SEE IN THE FAR RIGHT-HAND COLUMN THE RIGHT-HAND COLUMN THE FEASIBILITY FINDINGS ARE VERY FEASIBILITY FINDINGS ARE VERY SIMILAR TO THE FEASIBILITY SIMILAR TO THE FEASIBILITY FINDINGS UNDER THE EXISTING FINDINGS UNDER THE EXISTING CONDITIONS. CONDITIONS. SO NOW I’M GOING TO WALK THROUGH SO NOW I’M GOING TO WALK THROUGH SOME KEY FINDINGS AND SOME KEY FINDINGS AND CONSIDERATIONS. CONSIDERATIONS. SO THE STUDY’S FINDINGS SUPPORT SO THE STUDY’S FINDINGS SUPPORT A BALANCED APPROACH THAT A BALANCED APPROACH THAT ADVANCES THE CITY’S HOUSING ADVANCES THE CITY’S HOUSING GOALS WHILE MAINTAINING GOALS WHILE MAINTAINING DEVELOPMENT FEASIBILITY. DEVELOPMENT FEASIBILITY. A MAJOR BENEFIT OF THE UPDATE IS A MAJOR BENEFIT OF THE UPDATE IS REDUCED ADMINISTRATIVE BURDEN, REDUCED ADMINISTRATIVE BURDEN, SHIFTING TO A SIMPLE PER SQUARE SHIFTING TO A SIMPLE PER SQUARE FOOT FEE THAT ELIMINATES FOOT FEE THAT ELIMINATES SUBDIVISION-SPECIFIC PRICING SUBDIVISION-SPECIFIC PRICING CHECKS AND CREATES A CLEARER, CHECKS AND CREATES A CLEARER, MORE PREDICTABLE STRUCTURE FOR MORE PREDICTABLE STRUCTURE FOR APPLICANTS. APPLICANTS. THE ANALYSIS ALSO SHOWS A FEE THE ANALYSIS ALSO SHOWS A FEE CAN FUNCTION AS POLICY TOOL. CAN FUNCTION AS POLICY TOOL. WE HAVE A SECTION IN THE REPORT WE HAVE A SECTION IN THE REPORT WHERE WE LOOK AT PEER WHERE WE LOOK AT PEER JURISDICTIONS AND I’LL SHOW YOU JURISDICTIONS AND I’LL SHOW YOU A SUMMARY OF THAT IN THE NEXT A SUMMARY OF THAT IN THE NEXT SLIDE, BUT WE LOOKED IN THE SLIDE, BUT WE LOOKED IN THE SACRAMENTO REGION AND THEN SACRAMENTO REGION AND THEN BEYOND THE SACRAMENTO REGION. BEYOND THE SACRAMENTO REGION. AND IN BOTH GEOGRAPHIC AREAS, WE AND IN BOTH GEOGRAPHIC AREAS, WE NOTED THAT SEVERAL JURISDICTIONS NOTED THAT SEVERAL JURISDICTIONS TAILOR THEIR FEES TO ENCOURAGE TAILOR THEIR FEES TO ENCOURAGE CERTAIN PRODUCT TYPES OR GUIDE CERTAIN PRODUCT TYPES OR GUIDE DEVELOPMENT PATTERNS. DEVELOPMENT PATTERNS. FOR EXAMPLE, SANTA ROSA CHARGES FOR EXAMPLE, SANTA ROSA CHARGES A LOWER FEE FOR SMALLER UNITS TO A LOWER FEE FOR SMALLER UNITS TO SUPPORT THE PRODUCTION OF THOSE SUPPORT THE PRODUCTION OF THOSE TYPES OF UNITS. TYPES OF UNITS. CITY OF SACRAMENTO OFFERS CITY OF SACRAMENTO OFFERS REDUCED FEES IN ITS HOUSING REDUCED FEES IN ITS HOUSING INCENTIVE ZONE. INCENTIVE ZONE. SO INSTEAD OF PROMOTING OR SO INSTEAD OF PROMOTING OR INCENTIVIZING A SPECIFIC HOUSING INCENTIVIZING A SPECIFIC HOUSING TYPE LIKE SMALLER HOUSING UNITS, TYPE LIKE SMALLER HOUSING UNITS, THEY WANT TO INCENTIVE THEY WANT TO INCENTIVE DEVELOPMENT IN A CERTAIN AREA. DEVELOPMENT IN A CERTAIN AREA. SO THE CITY, THAT’S SOMETHING SO THE CITY, THAT’S SOMETHING THE CITY COULD CONSIDER IN THE CITY COULD CONSIDER IN FUTURE ITERATIONS OF THIS. FUTURE ITERATIONS OF THIS. THE FEASIBILITY RESULTS, AS THE FEASIBILITY RESULTS, AS MENTIONED, INDICATE THAT MENTIONED, INDICATE THAT MULTI-FAMILY RENTAL HOUSING MULTI-FAMILY RENTAL HOUSING SHOULD REMAIN EXEMPT. SHOULD REMAIN EXEMPT. AND THEN INDEXING THE UPDATED AND THEN INDEXING THE UPDATED FEE TO THE CONSTRUCTION COST FEE TO THE CONSTRUCTION COST INDEX WILL HELP KEEP IT ALIGNED INDEX WILL HELP KEEP IT ALIGNED WITH CONSTRUCTION TRENDS AS WELL WITH CONSTRUCTION TRENDS AS WELL AS PERIODIC MONITORING BY THE AS PERIODIC MONITORING BY THE CITY OF THE IN-LIEU FEE PROGRAM CITY OF THE IN-LIEU FEE PROGRAM WILL HELP ENSURE THAT THE FEE WILL HELP ENSURE THAT THE FEE CONTINUES TO SUPPORT POLICY CONTINUES TO SUPPORT POLICY GOALS WITHOUT INTENTIONALLY GOALS WITHOUT INTENTIONALLY HINDERING MARKET-RATE HINDERING MARKET-RATE DEVELOPMENT. DEVELOPMENT. SO HERE IS THE LOCAL SO HERE IS THE LOCAL JURISDICTION FEE COMPARISON THAT JURISDICTION FEE COMPARISON THAT I WAS JUST MENTIONING. I WAS JUST MENTIONING. COMPARED TO NEARBY COMPARED TO NEARBY JURISDICTIONS, AND I’LL NOTE JURISDICTIONS, AND I’LL NOTE THAT THE FIRST ROW IN RED IS THE THAT THE FIRST ROW IN RED IS THE RECOMMENDED FEE, SO THE FOLSOM’S RECOMMENDED FEE, SO THE FOLSOM’S RECOMMENDED FEE FALLS WITHIN A RECOMMENDED FEE FALLS WITHIN A REASONABLE MIDDLE RANGE AMONG REASONABLE MIDDLE RANGE AMONG JURISDICTIONS IN THE REGION. JURISDICTIONS IN THE REGION. SOMEWHAT LOWER THAN SACRAMENTO SOMEWHAT LOWER THAN SACRAMENTO AND SACRAMENTO COUNTY. AND SACRAMENTO COUNTY. AND SOMEWHAT HIGHER THAN RANCHO AND SOMEWHAT HIGHER THAN RANCHO CORDOVA AND ELK GROVE, ALTHOUGH CORDOVA AND ELK GROVE, ALTHOUGH I WILL ALSO NOTE THAT EPS IS I WILL ALSO NOTE THAT EPS IS ASSISTING ELK GROVE IN REVIEWING ASSISTING ELK GROVE IN REVIEWING AND POTENTIALLY UPDATING THEIR AND POTENTIALLY UPDATING THEIR EXISTING FEE. EXISTING FEE. THESE DIFFERENCES REFLECT THESE DIFFERENCES REFLECT PROGRAM DESIGN CHOICES AND LOCAL PROGRAM DESIGN CHOICES AND LOCAL HOUSING MARKET CONDITIONS AND HOUSING MARKET CONDITIONS AND FOLSOM’S STRUCTURE SHOULD REMAIN FOLSOM’S STRUCTURE SHOULD REMAIN COMPETITIVE IN THE REGION. COMPETITIVE IN THE REGION. AND I’M HAPPY TO ANSWER AND I’M HAPPY TO ANSWER QUESTIONS AT THE END OF THE QUESTIONS AT THE END OF THE PRESENTATION, THANK YOU. PRESENTATION, THANK YOU. I’LL HAND IT BACK OVER TO I’LL HAND IT BACK OVER TO DESMOND. DESMOND. ONE THING I WANTED TO POINT ONE THING I WANTED TO POINT OUT AS PART OF AMY’S OUT AS PART OF AMY’S PRESENTATION IS THAT WHILE IT PRESENTATION IS THAT WHILE IT LOOKS LIKE THE FEE IS GOING DOWN LOOKS LIKE THE FEE IS GOING DOWN SLIGHTLY, THE DIFFERENCE IS SLIGHTLY, THE DIFFERENCE IS BECAUSE WE’RE LOOKING AT A 2600 BECAUSE WE’RE LOOKING AT A 2600 SQUARE FOOT HOME. SQUARE FOOT HOME. SO THE LARGER THE HOME, THE FEE SO THE LARGER THE HOME, THE FEE GOES UP. GOES UP. THE SMALLER THE HOME, THE FEE THE SMALLER THE HOME, THE FEE GOES DOWN. GOES DOWN. SO WE DID A CALCULATION BASED ON SO WE DID A CALCULATION BASED ON THE LAST KIND OF FIVE YEARS, AND THE LAST KIND OF FIVE YEARS, AND THIS WOULD BE — THIS WOULD THIS WOULD BE — THIS WOULD RESULT IF WE HAD THE NEW PER RESULT IF WE HAD THE NEW PER SQUARE FEET APPROACH IN PLACE, SQUARE FEET APPROACH IN PLACE, THIS WOULD RESULT IN A SLIGHT THIS WOULD RESULT IN A SLIGHT INCREASE IN THE REVENUE COMING INCREASE IN THE REVENUE COMING INTO THE HOUSING FUND. INTO THE HOUSING FUND. SO BASED ON THE FEEDBACK THAT WE SO BASED ON THE FEEDBACK THAT WE GOT FROM BOTH THE HOUSING GOT FROM BOTH THE HOUSING ALLIANCE, SACRAMENTO HOUSING ALLIANCE, SACRAMENTO HOUSING ALLIANCE AND LEGAL SERVICES OF ALLIANCE AND LEGAL SERVICES OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA, AS WELL AS NORTHERN CALIFORNIA, AS WELL AS INPUT FROM THE BIA AND THE INPUT FROM THE BIA AND THE DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY, WE LOOKED DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY, WE LOOKED AT A COUPLE DIFFERENT AT A COUPLE DIFFERENT APPROACHES. APPROACHES. MOST OF THOSE WERE GEARED MOST OF THOSE WERE GEARED TOWARDS SOME OF THE ISSUES THAT TOWARDS SOME OF THE ISSUES THAT THE BIA HAD RAISED. THE BIA HAD RAISED. THE HOUSING ADVOCATE’S MAIN THE HOUSING ADVOCATE’S MAIN CONCERN WAS ENSURING THERE CONCERN WAS ENSURING THERE WASN’T AN OVERALL DECREASE IN WASN’T AN OVERALL DECREASE IN THE AMOUNT COLLECTED FOR THE THE AMOUNT COLLECTED FOR THE CITY’S HOUSING FUND, SINCE THEY CITY’S HOUSING FUND, SINCE THEY SAW THAT AS CRITICAL FOR GAP SAW THAT AS CRITICAL FOR GAP FINANCING. FINANCING. SO WE LOOKED AT THREE OPTIONS. SO WE LOOKED AT THREE OPTIONS. ONE WAS BASICALLY TO OUTSOURCE ONE WAS BASICALLY TO OUTSOURCE THE ADMINISTRATIVE TASKS BUT TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE TASKS BUT TO KEEP EVERYTHING THE SAME. KEEP EVERYTHING THE SAME. WE DID EXPLORE THAT. WE DID EXPLORE THAT. UNFORTUNATELY, WE WEREN’T ABLE UNFORTUNATELY, WE WEREN’T ABLE TO FIND A LOT OF OTHER TO FIND A LOT OF OTHER JURISDICTIONS THAT DID THAT, NOR JURISDICTIONS THAT DID THAT, NOR WERE WE ABLE TO FIND MANY WERE WE ABLE TO FIND MANY CONSULTANTS THAT WERE ALL THAT CONSULTANTS THAT WERE ALL THAT INTERESTED IN DOING THAT FOR US, INTERESTED IN DOING THAT FOR US, GIVEN THE COMPLEXITY. GIVEN THE COMPLEXITY. THE OTHER OPTION WAS TO RETAIN THE OTHER OPTION WAS TO RETAIN THE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE BUT THE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE BUT COLLECT THE FEES, ALL OF THE COLLECT THE FEES, ALL OF THE FEES AT THE FIRST CERTIFICATE OF FEES AT THE FIRST CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. OCCUPANCY. EVERYTHING WOULD BE DUE IN TERMS EVERYTHING WOULD BE DUE IN TERMS OF ALL THE IN-LIEU FEES. OF ALL THE IN-LIEU FEES. AND THEN THE OTHER OPTION, AND AND THEN THE OTHER OPTION, AND THIS CAME FROM A CONCERN AB THIS CAME FROM A CONCERN AB ABOUT — THE CONCERN OVER HOME ABOUT — THE CONCERN OVER HOME PRICES IN THAT A 1500 SQUARE PRICES IN THAT A 1500 SQUARE FOOT HOME OR 3,000 SQUARE FOOT FOOT HOME OR 3,000 SQUARE FOOT HOME IS NOT DOUBLE THE PRICE OF HOME IS NOT DOUBLE THE PRICE OF A 1500 SQUARE FOOT HOME, SO WHY A 1500 SQUARE FOOT HOME, SO WHY SHOULD THE FEE BE PER SQUARE SHOULD THE FEE BE PER SQUARE FOOT BE DOUBLED GOING FROM — FOOT BE DOUBLED GOING FROM — SORRY. SORRY. WHY THE FEE WOULD INCREASE, WHY THE FEE WOULD INCREASE, BECAUSE IN THAT EXAMPLE, $3 A BECAUSE IN THAT EXAMPLE, $3 A SQUARE FOOT FOR A 3,000 SQUARE SQUARE FOOT FOR A 3,000 SQUARE FOOT HOME, YOU’RE LOOKING AT FOOT HOME, YOU’RE LOOKING AT $9,000 FOR AN IN-LIEU FEE VERSUS $9,000 FOR AN IN-LIEU FEE VERSUS A SMALLER HOME THAT’S 1500 A SMALLER HOME THAT’S 1500 SQUARE FEET. SQUARE FEET. YOU’D BE LOOKING AT $4,500 OR YOU’D BE LOOKING AT $4,500 OR LESS. LESS. SO THE CONCERN WAS, WELL, OUR SO THE CONCERN WAS, WELL, OUR SALES PRICES AREN’T DOUBLE, SO SALES PRICES AREN’T DOUBLE, SO WHY SHOULD YOUR IN-LIEU FEES WHY SHOULD YOUR IN-LIEU FEES DOUBLE. DOUBLE. AND WE LOOKED AT — SO WE LOOKED AND WE LOOKED AT — SO WE LOOKED AT KIND OF DOING A REVERSE AT KIND OF DOING A REVERSE SLIDING SCALE THAT WOULD MAKE SLIDING SCALE THAT WOULD MAKE ADJUSTMENTS FOR THOSE LARGER ADJUSTMENTS FOR THOSE LARGER HOMES. HOMES. THE ISSUE THAT WE FOUND WITH THE ISSUE THAT WE FOUND WITH THAT IS THAT LARGER HOMES THAT IS THAT LARGER HOMES ACTUALLY GENERATE MORE IN THE ACTUALLY GENERATE MORE IN THE WAY OF THE NEED FOR MORE WAY OF THE NEED FOR MORE LOW-WAGE JOBS AND MORE NEED FOR LOW-WAGE JOBS AND MORE NEED FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING, SO IT WOULD AFFORDABLE HOUSING, SO IT WOULD ACTUALLY CONTRADICT THE FINDINGS ACTUALLY CONTRADICT THE FINDINGS THAT WERE IN THE STUDY. THAT WERE IN THE STUDY. SO BASED ON THAT, WE ULTIMATELY SO BASED ON THAT, WE ULTIMATELY DECIDED TO STICK WITH OUR DECIDED TO STICK WITH OUR CURRENT APPROACH, BECAUSE IT CURRENT APPROACH, BECAUSE IT ELIMINATES THE ADMINISTRATIVE ELIMINATES THE ADMINISTRATIVE BURDEN. BURDEN. IT MOVES WITH THE MARKET IN IT MOVES WITH THE MARKET IN TERMS OF THE CONSTRUCTION COST TERMS OF THE CONSTRUCTION COST INDEXING MECHANISM. INDEXING MECHANISM. AND IT’S PREDICTABLE AND IT’S AND IT’S PREDICTABLE AND IT’S SOMETHING THAT THE DEVELOPMENT SOMETHING THAT THE DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY CAN KNOW IN ADVANCE COMMUNITY CAN KNOW IN ADVANCE BEFORE SUBMITTING THEIR BUILDING BEFORE SUBMITTING THEIR BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATIONS. PERMIT APPLICATIONS. AND THEN WE HAVE IT BACKED BY A AND THEN WE HAVE IT BACKED BY A NEXUS STUDY WHICH SHORES UP KIND NEXUS STUDY WHICH SHORES UP KIND OF THE LEGAL STANDING OF IT AND OF THE LEGAL STANDING OF IT AND PROVIDES ADDITIONAL PROTECTION PROVIDES ADDITIONAL PROTECTION FOR THE CITY. FOR THE CITY. IN TERMS OF NEXT STEPS, IN TERMS OF NEXT STEPS, OBVIOUSLY THIS IS BEFORE YOU OBVIOUSLY THIS IS BEFORE YOU TONIGHT. TONIGHT. THIS IS THE FIRST READING. THIS IS THE FIRST READING. THE SECOND READING WOULD GO ON THE SECOND READING WOULD GO ON JANUARY 13TH. JANUARY 13TH. AT THAT TIME, WE WOULD ALSO AT THAT TIME, WE WOULD ALSO BRING FORWARD A RESOLUTION BRING FORWARD A RESOLUTION SETTING THE FEES, AND AS YOU SAW SETTING THE FEES, AND AS YOU SAW IN THE EXAMPLE, WE WOULD BE IN THE EXAMPLE, WE WOULD BE RECOMMENDING $3 A SQUARE FOOT RECOMMENDING $3 A SQUARE FOOT FOR EVERYTHING BUT HOMES LESS FOR EVERYTHING BUT HOMES LESS THAN 1500 SQUARE FEET. THAN 1500 SQUARE FEET. THOSE WOULD BE CHARGED AT 2.50 A THOSE WOULD BE CHARGED AT 2.50 A SQUARE FOOT. SQUARE FOOT. AND THE REASON FOR THAT IS BASED AND THE REASON FOR THAT IS BASED ON THE FEEDBACK WE’VE GOTTEN ON THE FEEDBACK WE’VE GOTTEN FROM COUNCIL THAT FIRST-TIME FROM COUNCIL THAT FIRST-TIME HOME BUYERS, SMALLER HOMES, AND HOME BUYERS, SMALLER HOMES, AND CONDOS AND TOWNHOMES, WHICH KIND CONDOS AND TOWNHOMES, WHICH KIND OF BETTER MEET THE NEEDS OF OF BETTER MEET THE NEEDS OF FIRST-TIME HOME BUYERS, WOULD BE FIRST-TIME HOME BUYERS, WOULD BE SOMETHING THAT WE WOULD SOMETHING THAT WE WOULD INCENTIVIZE. INCENTIVIZE. AS AMY EXPLAINED, WE DO NOT — AS AMY EXPLAINED, WE DO NOT — WE’RE NOT PROPOSING TO PUT IT ON WE’RE NOT PROPOSING TO PUT IT ON TO MULTI-FAMILY RENTAL PRODUCTS TO MULTI-FAMILY RENTAL PRODUCTS BECAUSE OF THE FACT THAT THERE’S BECAUSE OF THE FACT THAT THERE’S ALMOST A $40,000 GAP RIGHT NOW ALMOST A $40,000 GAP RIGHT NOW BETWEEN WHAT THEY CAN GET IN BETWEEN WHAT THEY CAN GET IN RENT AND WHAT IT COSTS TO RENT AND WHAT IT COSTS TO CONSTRUCT THOSE UNITS. CONSTRUCT THOSE UNITS. THE REASON WE DID PROPOSE THE REASON WE DID PROPOSE PUTTING IT FORWARD ON PUTTING IT FORWARD ON MULTI-FAMILY ATTACHED PROJECTS MULTI-FAMILY ATTACHED PROJECTS LIKE YOUR TOWNHOMES, CONDOS, IS LIKE YOUR TOWNHOMES, CONDOS, IS BECAUSE THE ONES THAT ARE BEING BECAUSE THE ONES THAT ARE BEING BUILT IN THE CITY, PRIMARILY BUILT IN THE CITY, PRIMARILY DOWN IN THE FOLSOM PLAN AREA, DOWN IN THE FOLSOM PLAN AREA, ARE SELLING FOR A PRICE THAT’S ARE SELLING FOR A PRICE THAT’S ONLY AFFORDABLE TO UPPER INCOME ONLY AFFORDABLE TO UPPER INCOME HOUSEHOLDS. HOUSEHOLDS. SO THE FOLKS THAT ARE EARNING A SO THE FOLKS THAT ARE EARNING A MODERATE INCOME, AROUND MODERATE INCOME, AROUND $120,000, THEY STILL CANNOT $120,000, THEY STILL CANNOT AFFORD THESE TYPES OF HOMES. AFFORD THESE TYPES OF HOMES. THE MAX THEY CAN AFFORD IS ABOUT THE MAX THEY CAN AFFORD IS ABOUT $400,000, BUT THE PRICES WE’RE $400,000, BUT THE PRICES WE’RE SEEING IS 550 AND UP IN THE SEEING IS 550 AND UP IN THE FOLSOM PLAN AREA. FOLSOM PLAN AREA. SO ASSUMING THAT YOU APPROVE SO ASSUMING THAT YOU APPROVE THIS ITEM TONIGHT AND ON THE THIS ITEM TONIGHT AND ON THE 13TH THEN, IF THAT WAS THE CASE, 13TH THEN, IF THAT WAS THE CASE, THEN THIS ORDINANCE WOULD GO THEN THIS ORDINANCE WOULD GO INTO EFFECT ON FEBRUARY 12TH OF INTO EFFECT ON FEBRUARY 12TH OF 2026. 2026. WE WOULD, OF COURSE, COMMUNICATE WE WOULD, OF COURSE, COMMUNICATE THAT OUT TO THE BY A BY A AND B. THAT OUT TO THE BY A BY A AND B. THE RECOMMENDED ACTION IS BEFORE THE RECOMMENDED ACTION IS BEFORE YOU TONIGHT. YOU TONIGHT. MYSELF AND AMY AND STEPHANIE ARE MYSELF AND AMY AND STEPHANIE ARE HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE. MAY HAVE. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. THANK YOU, DESMOND. THANK YOU, DESMOND. QUESTIONS FOR DESMOND, AMY, OR QUESTIONS FOR DESMOND, AMY, OR STEPHANIE? STEPHANIE? VICE MAYOR RAITHEL? VICE MAYOR RAITHEL? YEAH, I THINK MY QUESTIONS YEAH, I THINK MY QUESTIONS ARE PROBABLY FOR AMY, BUT I CAN ARE PROBABLY FOR AMY, BUT I CAN GET STARTED AND LET YOU GUYS GET STARTED AND LET YOU GUYS FIGURE THAT OUT. FIGURE THAT OUT. MY FIRST QUESTION IS REALLY THE MY FIRST QUESTION IS REALLY THE PROTOTYPES, THE THOUSAND SQUARE PROTOTYPES, THE THOUSAND SQUARE FOOT MULTI-FAMILY RENTAL VERSUS FOOT MULTI-FAMILY RENTAL VERSUS THE 1500 SQUARE FOOT CONDO. THE 1500 SQUARE FOOT CONDO. AND I READ THE REPORT, BASED ON AND I READ THE REPORT, BASED ON WHAT YOU WERE PRESENTING, MOST WHAT YOU WERE PRESENTING, MOST OF YOUR DIFFERENCES COME DOWN TO OF YOUR DIFFERENCES COME DOWN TO THE SIZE OF THAT UNIT. THE SIZE OF THAT UNIT. DID THOSE COME FROM ANY AVERAGES DID THOSE COME FROM ANY AVERAGES OF WHAT WE’RE ACTUALLY BUILDING? OF WHAT WE’RE ACTUALLY BUILDING? BECAUSE I’M NOT SURE WE’RE BECAUSE I’M NOT SURE WE’RE BUILDING TOO MANY 1,000 SQUARE BUILDING TOO MANY 1,000 SQUARE FOOT APARTMENTS HERE IN FOLSOM. FOOT APARTMENTS HERE IN FOLSOM. THEY DID. THEY DID. WE HAVE A LIST OF COMPARABLE WE HAVE A LIST OF COMPARABLE PROJECTS. PROJECTS. I THINK BOTH IN FOLSOM AND MAYBE I THINK BOTH IN FOLSOM AND MAYBE IN THE BROADER REGION. IN THE BROADER REGION. BUT PRIMARILY IN FOLSOM. BUT PRIMARILY IN FOLSOM. THAT HELPED INFORM. THAT HELPED INFORM. AND WE ALSO HAD MULTIPLE AND WE ALSO HAD MULTIPLE CONVERSATIONS WITH STAFF TO MAKE CONVERSATIONS WITH STAFF TO MAKE SURE THAT — AND WITH SURE THAT — AND WITH STAKEHOLDERS. STAKEHOLDERS. WE CONDUCTED OUR OWN STAKEHOLDER WE CONDUCTED OUR OWN STAKEHOLDER OUTREACH WITH BOTH MARKET-RATE OUTREACH WITH BOTH MARKET-RATE AND AFFORDABLE DEVELOPERS AND AND AFFORDABLE DEVELOPERS AND RAN THOSE ASSUMPTIONS BY THEN AS RAN THOSE ASSUMPTIONS BY THEN AS WELL. WELL. IF SOMEBODY LIVED IN A 1500 IF SOMEBODY LIVED IN A 1500 SQUARE FOOT RENTAL UNIT OR SQUARE FOOT RENTAL UNIT OR BOUGHT A 1500 SQUARE FOOT CONDO, BOUGHT A 1500 SQUARE FOOT CONDO, WOULD THEY NEED SUBSTANTIALLY WOULD THEY NEED SUBSTANTIALLY DIFFERENT INCOME OR AM I LOOKING DIFFERENT INCOME OR AM I LOOKING AT A VERY EQUIVALENT TYPE OF AT A VERY EQUIVALENT TYPE OF PERSON? PERSON? IS THERE A BIG DIFFERENCE IS THERE A BIG DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE RENTAL MARKET AND BETWEEN THE RENTAL MARKET AND THE FOR-SALE MARKET OF WHAT MY THE FOR-SALE MARKET OF WHAT MY DISPOSABLE INCOME IS AT THE END DISPOSABLE INCOME IS AT THE END OF THE DAY? OF THE DAY? BECAUSE I LOOK AT THE IMPACTS BECAUSE I LOOK AT THE IMPACTS AND IT’S LIKE WITHIN A DOLLAR, AND IT’S LIKE WITHIN A DOLLAR, RIGHT? RIGHT? MAYBE GO BACK TO THAT SLIDE, MAYBE GO BACK TO THAT SLIDE, BECAUSE I THINK YOU’RE BECAUSE I THINK YOU’RE CALCULATING THE IMPACT TO NOT BE CALCULATING THE IMPACT TO NOT BE ANY DIFFERENT. ANY DIFFERENT. LET’S GO BACK A LITTLE FURTHER LET’S GO BACK A LITTLE FURTHER HERE. HERE. MAYBE I’M MISUNDERSTANDING WHAT MAYBE I’M MISUNDERSTANDING WHAT THE NUMBERS ARE. THE NUMBERS ARE. LET’S GO BACK A LITTLE FURTHER. LET’S GO BACK A LITTLE FURTHER. THAT WAS IT! THAT WAS IT! OH, SORRY! OH, SORRY! THERE WAS ONE ABOUT, LIKE, $34 A THERE WAS ONE ABOUT, LIKE, $34 A SQUARE FOOT WAS THE MAXIMUM SQUARE FOOT WAS THE MAXIMUM CALCULATED IN-LIEU FEE. CALCULATED IN-LIEU FEE. THAT WAS THE IMPACT? THAT WAS THE IMPACT? THERE IT IS. THERE IT IS. IS THAT IT? IS THAT IT? YES. YES. SO 36, MULTI-FAMILY ATTACHED, SO 36, MULTI-FAMILY ATTACHED, I’M LOOKING AT YOUR REPORT. I’M LOOKING AT YOUR REPORT. I’VE GOT 34 FOR SINGLE FAMILY I’VE GOT 34 FOR SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED. ATTACHED. THAT UPDATED MAXIMUM IN-LIEU FEE THAT UPDATED MAXIMUM IN-LIEU FEE IS KIND OF LIKE A COROLLARY TO IS KIND OF LIKE A COROLLARY TO WHAT THE IMPACT IS, RIGHT? WHAT THE IMPACT IS, RIGHT? THAT’S WHY IT’S MUCH HIGHER? THAT’S WHY IT’S MUCH HIGHER? IT IS, YES. IT IS, YES. SO IT’S PRETTY SIMILAR — IT SO IT’S PRETTY SIMILAR — IT STEPS UP FOR MULTI-FAMILY STEPS UP FOR MULTI-FAMILY ATTACHED, BUT THERE’S NOT A ATTACHED, BUT THERE’S NOT A DIFFERENTIATION BETWEEN RENTAL DIFFERENTIATION BETWEEN RENTAL HERE AND FOR SALE, RIGHT? HERE AND FOR SALE, RIGHT? WELL, YOU NEED A DOWN PAYMENT WELL, YOU NEED A DOWN PAYMENT AND YOU NEED A CERTAIN MONTHLY AND YOU NEED A CERTAIN MONTHLY INCOME IN ORDER TO QUALIFY FOR INCOME IN ORDER TO QUALIFY FOR THE OWNER OCCUPIED MULTI-FAMILY THE OWNER OCCUPIED MULTI-FAMILY PRODUCT VERSUS THE CAPITAL PRODUCT VERSUS THE CAPITAL OUTLAY ON A MONTHLY BASIS FOR OUTLAY ON A MONTHLY BASIS FOR THE RENTAL PRODUCT. THE RENTAL PRODUCT. IT’S MUCH LESS. IT’S MUCH LESS. OKAY, BUT AM I READING OKAY, BUT AM I READING THAT — THAT’S THE M3401, IS THAT — THAT’S THE M3401, IS THAT FOR RENTAL FAMILY? THAT FOR RENTAL FAMILY? IT IS. IT IS. THAT’S FOR A RENTAL FAMILY, THAT’S FOR A RENTAL FAMILY, OKAY. OKAY. YES. YES. AND IT’S ALSO FOR THE AND IT’S ALSO FOR THE FOR-SALE FAMILY? FOR-SALE FAMILY? THAT’S THE IMPACT THAT WE WOULD THAT’S THE IMPACT THAT WE WOULD EXPECT THEM TO HAVE ON THE NEED EXPECT THEM TO HAVE ON THE NEED FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING? FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING? YES. YES. AND AGAIN, IT’S BASED ON THESE AND AGAIN, IT’S BASED ON THESE THREE STEPS, WHICH IS THE THREE STEPS, WHICH IS THE AFFORDABILITY GAP FOR THOSE AFFORDABILITY GAP FOR THOSE PARTICULAR PROTOTYPES AND THE PARTICULAR PROTOTYPES AND THE NUMBER OF WORKERS HOUSEHOLDS NUMBER OF WORKERS HOUSEHOLDS GENERATED BY THE SPENDING OF THE GENERATED BY THE SPENDING OF THE HOUSEHOLDS IN THOSE PARTICULAR HOUSEHOLDS IN THOSE PARTICULAR PROTOTYPES. PROTOTYPES. OKAY. OKAY. AND THEN THE NEIGHBORING AND THEN THE NEIGHBORING JURISDICTIONS THAT WE HAVE, FROM JURISDICTIONS THAT WE HAVE, FROM WHAT I CAN TELL FROM THE REPORT, WHAT I CAN TELL FROM THE REPORT, IT LOOKS LIKE MOST OF THEM ARE IT LOOKS LIKE MOST OF THEM ARE CHARGING THEIR SQUARE FOOT FEE CHARGING THEIR SQUARE FOOT FEE FOR YOUR RENTAL PRODUCTS ALSO? FOR YOUR RENTAL PRODUCTS ALSO? SOME ARE, YES. SOME ARE, YES. BUT SOME ARE NOT. BUT SOME ARE NOT. OKAY. OKAY. DO WE KNOW WHICH ONES? DO WE KNOW WHICH ONES? DO WE HAVE THAT? DO WE HAVE THAT? THE ONES WAY OUTSIDE OF OUR THE ONES WAY OUTSIDE OF OUR AREA, I’M NOT TOO INTERESTED IN, AREA, I’M NOT TOO INTERESTED IN, BUT THE ONES THAT ARE CLOSE TO BUT THE ONES THAT ARE CLOSE TO HERE, IT LOOKS LIKE OUR HERE, IT LOOKS LIKE OUR NEIGHBORING JURISDICTIONS ARE NEIGHBORING JURISDICTIONS ARE CHARGING FOR A RENTAL CHARGING FOR A RENTAL MULTI-FAMILY PRODUCT. MULTI-FAMILY PRODUCT. YOU’RE SAYING SOME OF THEM ARE YOU’RE SAYING SOME OF THEM ARE NOT? NOT? I WILL SAY FOLSOM IS ONE OF I WILL SAY FOLSOM IS ONE OF THE FEW THAT HAS AN IN-LIEU FEE THE FEW THAT HAS AN IN-LIEU FEE PROGRAM AND WHEN THE IN-LIEU FEE PROGRAM AND WHEN THE IN-LIEU FEE PROGRAM WAS ESTABLISHED, PROGRAM WAS ESTABLISHED, MULTI-FAMILY RENTAL WAS NOT MULTI-FAMILY RENTAL WAS NOT ALLOWED TO BE CHARGED. ALLOWED TO BE CHARGED. UNDERSTOOD. UNDERSTOOD. THE PEER JURISDICTIONS THAT THE PEER JURISDICTIONS THAT WE LOOKED AT HAVE A DEVELOPMENT WE LOOKED AT HAVE A DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE, AND THERE WAS NO IMPACT FEE, AND THERE WAS NO SUCH LIMITATION FOR THAT, SO SUCH LIMITATION FOR THAT, SO THEY DID ADOPT A FEE. THEY DID ADOPT A FEE. SOME OF THEM DID ADOPT A FEE SOME OF THEM DID ADOPT A FEE ASSESSED ON MULTI-FAMILY RENTAL ASSESSED ON MULTI-FAMILY RENTAL PRODUCTS. PRODUCTS. OKAY. OKAY. I THINK — AND THESE CHANGES, I THINK — AND THESE CHANGES, ONE OTHER QUESTION. ONE OTHER QUESTION. THESE CHANGES ARE NOT JUST FOR THESE CHANGES ARE NOT JUST FOR THE FOLSOM PLAN AREA. THE FOLSOM PLAN AREA. THESE CHANGES ARE THROUGHOUT THESE CHANGES ARE THROUGHOUT FOLSOM? FOLSOM? YES. YES. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. THAT’S ALL MY QUESTIONS. THAT’S ALL MY QUESTIONS. COUNCIL MEMBER KOZLOWSKI? COUNCIL MEMBER KOZLOWSKI? YES, MY QUESTION IS KIND OF YES, MY QUESTION IS KIND OF ABOUT THE EDGE CASE ON THE ABOUT THE EDGE CASE ON THE REQUIREMENT TO CHARGE THESE FEES REQUIREMENT TO CHARGE THESE FEES AT ALL. AT ALL. I KNOW THAT WE HAVE AN I KNOW THAT WE HAVE AN INTERESTING HISTORY OF HOW WE INTERESTING HISTORY OF HOW WE ARRIVED HERE IN THE FIRST PLACE, ARRIVED HERE IN THE FIRST PLACE, BUT IS THERE — AND I’M THINKING BUT IS THERE — AND I’M THINKING SERVING AT SACOG THAT WE’RE SERVING AT SACOG THAT WE’RE COMING UP ON A CYCLE SOONER COMING UP ON A CYCLE SOONER RATHER THAN LATER. RATHER THAN LATER. WE HAVE THESE REQUIREMENTS TO WE HAVE THESE REQUIREMENTS TO STIMULATE OR CREATE THE STIMULATE OR CREATE THE OPPORTUNITY FOR LOW-INCOME OPPORTUNITY FOR LOW-INCOME HOUSING OF VARIOUS STRIPES BUT HOUSING OF VARIOUS STRIPES BUT IS THERE ACTUALLY A MANDATE THAT IS THERE ACTUALLY A MANDATE THAT WE HAVE AN IN-LIEU FEE PROGRAM WE HAVE AN IN-LIEU FEE PROGRAM AT ALL? AT ALL? AND TO WHAT EXTENT? AND TO WHAT EXTENT? AND I KNOW THAT’S KIND OF A AND I KNOW THAT’S KIND OF A BROAD QUESTION, BUT I JUST FEEL BROAD QUESTION, BUT I JUST FEEL LIKE THAT MIGHT BE AN LIKE THAT MIGHT BE AN INTERESTING UNDERPINNING FOR THE INTERESTING UNDERPINNING FOR THE PUBLIC TO UNDERSTAND. PUBLIC TO UNDERSTAND. SO THE CURRENT INCLUSIONARY SO THE CURRENT INCLUSIONARY HOUSING ORDINANCE WHICH INCLUDES HOUSING ORDINANCE WHICH INCLUDES THE IN-LIEU FEE WAS THE RESULT THE IN-LIEU FEE WAS THE RESULT OF A SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT FROM A OF A SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT FROM A LAWSUIT BACK IN THE EARLY 2000S LAWSUIT BACK IN THE EARLY 2000S THAT THE CITY LOST AND THEN WE THAT THE CITY LOST AND THEN WE WERE REQUIRED TO PUT THAT IN WERE REQUIRED TO PUT THAT IN PLACE. PLACE. MM-HMM. MM-HMM. JURISDICTIONS ARE NOT JURISDICTIONS ARE NOT REQUIRED TO HAVE INCLUSIONARY REQUIRED TO HAVE INCLUSIONARY ORDINANCES, BUT THEY HAVE ORDINANCES, BUT THEY HAVE BECOME, PARTICULARLY WITH THE BECOME, PARTICULARLY WITH THE HOUSING ELEMENT CYCLE, A HOUSING ELEMENT CYCLE, A CRITICAL TOOL IN TERMS OF CRITICAL TOOL IN TERMS OF PROVIDING GAP FINANCING ON PROVIDING GAP FINANCING ON AFFORDABLE PROJECTS OR BUYING AFFORDABLE PROJECTS OR BUYING LAND TO DEVELOP AFFORDABLE LAND TO DEVELOP AFFORDABLE HOUSING OR OTHER THINGS LIKE HOUSING OR OTHER THINGS LIKE THAT. THAT. IT’S ONE OF THE FEW MECHANISMS IT’S ONE OF THE FEW MECHANISMS THAT WE HAVE TO HELP SUPPORT THE THAT WE HAVE TO HELP SUPPORT THE CONSTRUCTION OF DEED-RESTRICTED CONSTRUCTION OF DEED-RESTRICTED AFFORDABLE HOUSING IN FOLSOM. AFFORDABLE HOUSING IN FOLSOM. AND THIS HAS BECOME EVEN MORE AND THIS HAS BECOME EVEN MORE IMPORTANT WITH THE DECLINE IN IMPORTANT WITH THE DECLINE IN FEDERAL FUNDING AND THEN THE FEDERAL FUNDING AND THEN THE LIMITATIONS THE STATE HAS GIVEN LIMITATIONS THE STATE HAS GIVEN THE STATE’S BUDGET PROBLEMS. THE STATE’S BUDGET PROBLEMS. GOTCHA. GOTCHA. AND MAYBE THIS QUESTION IS FOR AND MAYBE THIS QUESTION IS FOR THE CITY ATTORNEY. THE CITY ATTORNEY. HAVE WE SATISFIED THAT HAVE WE SATISFIED THAT SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT IN OTHER SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT IN OTHER RESPECTS? RESPECTS? AND IS THIS A PERPETUAL AND IS THIS A PERPETUAL REQUIREMENT THAT WE WILL LIVE REQUIREMENT THAT WE WILL LIVE UNDER FOR ALL TIME? UNDER FOR ALL TIME? IT DEPENDS ON HOW ONE READS IT DEPENDS ON HOW ONE READS THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. I WOULD SAY IT’S ONGOING UNTIL I WOULD SAY IT’S ONGOING UNTIL SOMETHING CHANGES. SOMETHING CHANGES. THERE WASN’T A TARGET NUMBER THERE WASN’T A TARGET NUMBER OF UNITS OR CONDITIONS TO REACH? OF UNITS OR CONDITIONS TO REACH? NO, IT WAS A TIME FRAME. NO, IT WAS A TIME FRAME. SO THE CITY COUNCIL HAS ALREADY SO THE CITY COUNCIL HAS ALREADY SATISFIED THE TIME FRAME SATISFIED THE TIME FRAME REQUIREMENT AND THE CITY COUNCIL REQUIREMENT AND THE CITY COUNCIL HAS CONTINUED OVER THE YEARS BY HAS CONTINUED OVER THE YEARS BY IMPLEMENTING THE GENERAL PLAN IMPLEMENTING THE GENERAL PLAN INCLUDING UPDATES TO INCLUDE INCLUDING UPDATES TO INCLUDE INCLUSIONARY. INCLUSIONARY. FOR PRACTICAL REASONS, BECAUSE FOR PRACTICAL REASONS, BECAUSE IT’S NOT JUST THE SETTLEMENT IT’S NOT JUST THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT THAT’S PART OF THE AGREEMENT THAT’S PART OF THE CONSIDERATION. CONSIDERATION. IT’S THE ARENA TO MEET THE IT’S THE ARENA TO MEET THE STATE’S REPEATED MANDATES OVER STATE’S REPEATED MANDATES OVER THE YEARS. THE YEARS. IF WE WERE A JURISDICTION IF WE WERE A JURISDICTION THAT HADN’T STARTED DOWN THIS THAT HADN’T STARTED DOWN THIS ROAD BECAUSE THERE HAD BEEN NO ROAD BECAUSE THERE HAD BEEN NO SETTLEMENT, WE IN SOME WAYS SETTLEMENT, WE IN SOME WAYS WOULDN’T HAVE ANY HOOK FROM THE WOULDN’T HAVE ANY HOOK FROM THE STATE TO FORCE US TO — STATE TO FORCE US TO — WE MIGHT. WE MIGHT. IN TERMS OF SUBSIDIZING IN TERMS OF SUBSIDIZING CONSTRUCTION RATHER THAN CONSTRUCTION RATHER THAN CREATING CONDITIONS? CREATING CONDITIONS? YES, SIR. YES, SIR. AND IT COULD ACTUALLY TAKE THE AND IT COULD ACTUALLY TAKE THE MONEY OUT OF THE GENERAL FUND TO MONEY OUT OF THE GENERAL FUND TO HELP THE CITY HEAD OFF ANY HELP THE CITY HEAD OFF ANY ENFORCEMENT ACTION FROM THE ENFORCEMENT ACTION FROM THE STATE. STATE. WE ALWAYS HAVE THE OPTION TO WE ALWAYS HAVE THE OPTION TO SPEND OUR GENERAL FUND IN A LOT SPEND OUR GENERAL FUND IN A LOT OF WAYS. OF WAYS. ARE YOU SAYING THE STATE WOULD ARE YOU SAYING THE STATE WOULD MANDATE THAT WE DO THAT? MANDATE THAT WE DO THAT? I’M NOT SAYING THAT. I’M NOT SAYING THAT. I’M SAYING THE TREND IS I’M SAYING THE TREND IS CONCERNING. CONCERNING. THE STATE HAS ESTABLISHED — I THE STATE HAS ESTABLISHED — I DON’T THINK THIS IS RECENT, IT’S DON’T THINK THIS IS RECENT, IT’S A YEAR OR TWO AGO — ENFORCEMENT A YEAR OR TWO AGO — ENFORCEMENT UNITS. UNITS. THIS IS SOMETHING THE STATE IS THIS IS SOMETHING THE STATE IS HAMMERING LOCAL JURISDICTIONS TO HAMMERING LOCAL JURISDICTIONS TO MAKE SURE THAT WE OR THEY EXERT MAKE SURE THAT WE OR THEY EXERT AS MUCH PRESSURE AS POSSIBLE ON AS MUCH PRESSURE AS POSSIBLE ON LOCAL JURISDICTIONS TO ALLOW LOCAL JURISDICTIONS TO ALLOW AFFORDABLE HOUSING TO BE AFFORDABLE HOUSING TO BE PRODUCED. PRODUCED. THEY KNOW AND WE KNOW WE DO NOT THEY KNOW AND WE KNOW WE DO NOT BUILD, BUT THEY WANT US TO BUILD, BUT THEY WANT US TO INCENTIVIZE. INCENTIVIZE. AND THIS IS HOW WE INCENTIVIZE AND THIS IS HOW WE INCENTIVIZE AFFORDABLE HOUSING CONSTRUCTION. AFFORDABLE HOUSING CONSTRUCTION. ALL RIGHT, I’M NOT SURE THAT ALL RIGHT, I’M NOT SURE THAT FULLY ANSWERED MY QUESTION, FULLY ANSWERED MY QUESTION, BECAUSE I’M TRYING TO GET DOWN BECAUSE I’M TRYING TO GET DOWN TO THE BASE LEVEL OF IF WE FEEL TO THE BASE LEVEL OF IF WE FEEL LIKE WE’VE MET THE SETTLEMENT LIKE WE’VE MET THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AT SOME TIME, AND WE AGREEMENT AT SOME TIME, AND WE RECOGNIZE THAT THE BULK OF THE RECOGNIZE THAT THE BULK OF THE RESPONSIBILITY TO THE RHNA RESPONSIBILITY TO THE RHNA PROCESS IS TO MAKE SURE THERE’S PROCESS IS TO MAKE SURE THERE’S LAND AVAILABLE FOR THE TYPE OF LAND AVAILABLE FOR THE TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT THAT’S DESIRED, IS DEVELOPMENT THAT’S DESIRED, IS THERE A STATE MANDATE FOR US TO THERE A STATE MANDATE FOR US TO ALSO ACT AS A TAX COLLECTOR AND ALSO ACT AS A TAX COLLECTOR AND FINANCIER OF CONSTRUCTION ON FINANCIER OF CONSTRUCTION ON THAT LAND? THAT LAND? THE ANSWER IS NO. THE ANSWER IS NO. BUT PRACTICALLY SPEAKING, IT’S BUT PRACTICALLY SPEAKING, IT’S NOT SO SIMPLE, BECAUSE THE NOT SO SIMPLE, BECAUSE THE PRESSURE IS FROM ELSEWHERE. PRESSURE IS FROM ELSEWHERE. I GET THAT. I GET THAT. LISTEN, THE WORK THAT WAS DONE LISTEN, THE WORK THAT WAS DONE HERE IS EXCELLENT. HERE IS EXCELLENT. I JUST WANTED TO BACK UP A I JUST WANTED TO BACK UP A COUPLE OF STEPS AND MAKE SURE WE COUPLE OF STEPS AND MAKE SURE WE UNDERSTAND THE BASE CASE FOR WHY UNDERSTAND THE BASE CASE FOR WHY WE’RE DOING THIS, THANK YOU. WE’RE DOING THIS, THANK YOU. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. COUNCIL MEMBER ROHRBOUGH, ANY COUNCIL MEMBER ROHRBOUGH, ANY QUESTIONS? QUESTIONS? CANCOUNCIL MEMBER LEERY? CANCOUNCIL MEMBER LEERY? L LEARLY? L LEARLY? LEARY? LEARY? WERE ALL OF THOSE COSTS AN WERE ALL OF THOSE COSTS AN AVERAGE AS WELL FOR THE AVERAGE AS WELL FOR THE MUNICIPALITIES? MUNICIPALITIES? OR IS THAT A HARD QUESTION TO OR IS THAT A HARD QUESTION TO ANSWER? ANSWER? SO, NO, IT’S BASED ON THE SO, NO, IT’S BASED ON THE PROTOTYPE, SO THERE’S THE 2600 PROTOTYPE, SO THERE’S THE 2600 SQUARE FOOT PROTOTYPE, AND SO SQUARE FOOT PROTOTYPE, AND SO THAT’S WHY IT WAS USED. THAT’S WHY IT WAS USED. WHAT I WAS TRYING TO POINT OUT WHAT I WAS TRYING TO POINT OUT AND MAYBE DIDN’T DO A GOOD JOB AND MAYBE DIDN’T DO A GOOD JOB OF IT, SINCE WE HAVE $3 A SQUARE OF IT, SINCE WE HAVE $3 A SQUARE FOOT, IT’S NOT GOING TO MEAN FOOT, IT’S NOT GOING TO MEAN THAT EVERY HOUSE PAYS 7800 THERE THAT EVERY HOUSE PAYS 7800 THERE $7,800 INAN IN-LIEU FEE. $7,800 INAN IN-LIEU FEE. IT WILL DEPEND ON WHETHER IT’S IT WILL DEPEND ON WHETHER IT’S 1600 OR 3,000 SQUARE FEET, SO 1600 OR 3,000 SQUARE FEET, SO THE FEE LEVEL WILL VARY BASED OA THE FEE LEVEL WILL VARY BASED OA REPRESENTATIVE SNAPSHOT BASED ON REPRESENTATIVE SNAPSHOT BASED ON THE 2600 SQUARE FOOT PROTOTYPE. THE 2600 SQUARE FOOT PROTOTYPE. SO HOMES IN RANCHO CORDOVA SO HOMES IN RANCHO CORDOVA THAT ARE 2600 SQUARE FEET ARE THAT ARE 2600 SQUARE FEET ARE SIGNIFICANTLY LOWER FEE? SIGNIFICANTLY LOWER FEE? SO THIS WAS FROM SOME TIME SO THIS WAS FROM SOME TIME AGO AND IT WAS NEGOTIATED AND AGO AND IT WAS NEGOTIATED AND IT’S ONE SPECIFIC PLAN. IT’S ONE SPECIFIC PLAN. THERE ARE MULTIPLE SPECIFIC THERE ARE MULTIPLE SPECIFIC PLANS IN RANCHO CORDOVA. PLANS IN RANCHO CORDOVA. IT’S THE RIO DEL ORO SPECIFIC IT’S THE RIO DEL ORO SPECIFIC PLAN AND IT WAS DONE QUITE SOME PLAN AND IT WAS DONE QUITE SOME TIME AGO, SO THAT’S THE TIME AGO, SO THAT’S THE EXPLANATION FOR THAT SITUATION. EXPLANATION FOR THAT SITUATION. AND THEN DAVIS, OF COURSE, IS AND THEN DAVIS, OF COURSE, IS QUITE THE OUTLIER HERE WITH THE QUITE THE OUTLIER HERE WITH THE 21,000 SQUARE FOOT. 21,000 SQUARE FOOT. OKAY. OKAY. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING, SO I THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING, SO I WILL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. WILL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. WE DO HAVE A REQUEST TO SPEAK. WE DO HAVE A REQUEST TO SPEAK. YES, FROM MARTIN NAVINSKI. YES, FROM MARTIN NAVINSKI. MARTIN, WHILE YOU’RE MAKING YOUR MARTIN, WHILE YOU’RE MAKING YOUR WAY DOWN, WE HAVE TWO REQUESTS WAY DOWN, WE HAVE TWO REQUESTS FROM YOU, BUT BOTH IDENTIFY ITEM FROM YOU, BUT BOTH IDENTIFY ITEM 15. 15. DID YOU JUST WANT TO SPEAK UPON DID YOU JUST WANT TO SPEAK UPON ONE ITEM? ONE ITEM? NO, TWO ITEMS. NO, TWO ITEMS. WHAT WAS THE OTHER ONE? WHAT WAS THE OTHER ONE? I DON’T REMEMBER. I DON’T REMEMBER. YOU CAN LET ME KNOW YOU CAN LET ME KNOW AFTERWARDS. AFTERWARDS. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. I CAN CALL YOU BACK UP AGAIN. I CAN CALL YOU BACK UP AGAIN. THANK YOU, MAYOR AQUINO, THANK YOU, MAYOR AQUINO, COUNCIL MEMBERS, THANK YOU FOR COUNCIL MEMBERS, THANK YOU FOR HAVING ME TONIGHT. HAVING ME TONIGHT. I’M HERE TO TALK ABOUT THE I’M HERE TO TALK ABOUT THE INCLUSIONARY HOUSING ORDINANCE. INCLUSIONARY HOUSING ORDINANCE. I WALKED IN LATE, MAYBE I MISSED I WALKED IN LATE, MAYBE I MISSED THIS, BUT THE WHOLE REASON IN MY THIS, BUT THE WHOLE REASON IN MY OPINION THAT THIS IS GOING ON, I OPINION THAT THIS IS GOING ON, I THINK THE CITY HAS BEEN MAKING THINK THE CITY HAS BEEN MAKING SOME FISCAL POLICY CHANGES SOME FISCAL POLICY CHANGES RECENTLY TO BECOME MORE RECENTLY TO BECOME MORE EFFICIENT TO LIVE WITHIN YOUR EFFICIENT TO LIVE WITHIN YOUR MEANS A LITTLE BIT BETTER AND I MEANS A LITTLE BIT BETTER AND I THINK THIS IS STAFF’S THINK THIS IS STAFF’S OPPORTUNITY TO TRY TO MAKE OPPORTUNITY TO TRY TO MAKE THEMSELVES MORE EFFICIENT. THEMSELVES MORE EFFICIENT. I THINK THE STAFF HAS DONE A I THINK THE STAFF HAS DONE A GOOD JOB EXPLAINING HOW GOOD JOB EXPLAINING HOW BURDENSOME IT IS FOR THEM TO BURDENSOME IT IS FOR THEM TO ADMINISTER THIS PROGRAM. ADMINISTER THIS PROGRAM. WE’RE PART OF THIS PROGRAM, IT WE’RE PART OF THIS PROGRAM, IT WORKS FOR US, BUT IT IS WORKS FOR US, BUT IT IS ADMINISTRATIVELY BURDENSOME FOR ADMINISTRATIVELY BURDENSOME FOR US AS WELL. US AS WELL. I HEARD DESMOND SAY IT’S I HEARD DESMOND SAY IT’S SOMETIMES DIFFICULT TO EVEN SOMETIMES DIFFICULT TO EVEN COLLECT INFORMATION FROM THE COLLECT INFORMATION FROM THE BUILDERS, EXCEPT FOR ONE! BUILDERS, EXCEPT FOR ONE! I BELIEVE YOU’LL GET I BELIEVE YOU’LL GET REINFORCEMENT FROM THEM THAT REINFORCEMENT FROM THEM THAT THERE’S ONE BUILDER THAT DOES THERE’S ONE BUILDER THAT DOES PARTICIPATE PRETTY WELL. PARTICIPATE PRETTY WELL. SO FROM A PRACTICALITY SO FROM A PRACTICALITY STANDPOINT, BECOMING MORE STANDPOINT, BECOMING MORE EFFICIENT IS A GOOD THING. EFFICIENT IS A GOOD THING. AND I THINK YOUR STAFF HAS DONE AND I THINK YOUR STAFF HAS DONE A GREAT JOB OF BEING VERY A GREAT JOB OF BEING VERY TRANSPARENT AND DOING OUTREACH TRANSPARENT AND DOING OUTREACH AND KEEPING THE DEVELOPMENT AND KEEPING THE DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY INFORMED OF THIS COMMUNITY INFORMED OF THIS PROCESS AND WHAT THEY’RE GOING PROCESS AND WHAT THEY’RE GOING THROUGH AND LISTENING TO OUR THROUGH AND LISTENING TO OUR CONCERNS AND EVERYTHING. CONCERNS AND EVERYTHING. BASICALLY THERE’S THREE OPTIONS BASICALLY THERE’S THREE OPTIONS THAT YOU HAVE BEFORE YOU. THAT YOU HAVE BEFORE YOU. OPTION 1, KEEP IT THE SAME, BUT OPTION 1, KEEP IT THE SAME, BUT OUTSOURCE TO SOME OTHER COMPANY OUTSOURCE TO SOME OTHER COMPANY TO ADMINISTER. TO ADMINISTER. THAT’S A FEE INCREASE. THAT’S A FEE INCREASE. WE PAY THE SAME AMOUNT OF FEE, WE PAY THE SAME AMOUNT OF FEE, BUT THEN WE ALSO HAVE TO PAY FOR BUT THEN WE ALSO HAVE TO PAY FOR THE OUTSOURCING ADMINISTRATION THE OUTSOURCING ADMINISTRATION FEE, SO THAT INCREASES OUR FEES. FEE, SO THAT INCREASES OUR FEES. THE SECOND OPTION WAS TO COLLECT THE SECOND OPTION WAS TO COLLECT ALL OF THE MONEY AT THE ALL OF THE MONEY AT THE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY, THE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY, THE FIRST CLOSING, IF YOU WILL, IN A FIRST CLOSING, IF YOU WILL, IN A SUBMISSION. SUBMISSION. AND THE REASON WE DON’T LIKE AND THE REASON WE DON’T LIKE THAT, IF WE HAD 100-LOT THAT, IF WE HAD 100-LOT SUBDIVISION AND A 3,000 SQUARE SUBDIVISION AND A 3,000 SQUARE FOOT HOUSE, THAT’S A $9,000 PER FOOT HOUSE, THAT’S A $9,000 PER HOUSE, SO YOU’D COLLECT $900,00W HOUSE, SO YOU’D COLLECT $900,00W ON OUR FIRST HOME. ON OUR FIRST HOME. THAT’S FISCALLY VERY BURDENSOME THAT’S FISCALLY VERY BURDENSOME AND I WOULDN’T COME IN WITH AND I WOULDN’T COME IN WITH 100-LOT SUBDIVISIONS ANYMORE. 100-LOT SUBDIVISIONS ANYMORE. I’D COME IN WITH TEN-LOT I’D COME IN WITH TEN-LOT SUBDIVISIONS TEN TIMES IN A ROW. SUBDIVISIONS TEN TIMES IN A ROW. AND AS YOUR PUBLIC WORKS AND AS YOUR PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR AND CITY ENGINEER CAN DIRECTOR AND CITY ENGINEER CAN ATTEST, THERE’S QUITE A BIT OF ATTEST, THERE’S QUITE A BIT OF WORK THAT GOES INTO A FINAL MAP WORK THAT GOES INTO A FINAL MAP AND THAT WOULD I THINK INCREASE AND THAT WOULD I THINK INCREASE THE ADMINISTRATIVE BURDEN ON THE ADMINISTRATIVE BURDEN ON YOUR STAFF AGAIN BY TEN-FOLD. YOUR STAFF AGAIN BY TEN-FOLD. SO THE SECOND OPTION DOESN’T SO THE SECOND OPTION DOESN’T REALLY WORK FOR US EITHER. REALLY WORK FOR US EITHER. THE THIRD OPTION IS GOING TO A THE THIRD OPTION IS GOING TO A FLAT SQUARE FOOT FEE OF $3 PER FLAT SQUARE FOOT FEE OF $3 PER SQUARE FOOT AND I THINK THE CITY SQUARE FOOT AND I THINK THE CITY HAS DONE A REALLY GOOD JOB OF HAS DONE A REALLY GOOD JOB OF TRYING TO KEEP THE FEE ABOUT THE TRYING TO KEEP THE FEE ABOUT THE SAME WHERE IT IS. SAME WHERE IT IS. THE CITY HAS COLLECTED QUITE A THE CITY HAS COLLECTED QUITE A BIT OF MONEY. BIT OF MONEY. WE’RE IN FAVOR OF LESSENING THE WE’RE IN FAVOR OF LESSENING THE BURDEN ON STAFF WHICH HELPS US, BURDEN ON STAFF WHICH HELPS US, IT HELPS US FOR FORECASTING WHAT IT HELPS US FOR FORECASTING WHAT OUR FEE WILL BE BEFORE WE STEP OUR FEE WILL BE BEFORE WE STEP INTO IT. INTO IT. AND IF THE CITY IS GOING TO AND IF THE CITY IS GOING TO CONSIDER ONE OF THE THREE, TOLL CONSIDER ONE OF THE THREE, TOLL BROTHERS WOULD SUPPORT OPTION 3, BROTHERS WOULD SUPPORT OPTION 3, THE SQUARE FOOT, $3 PER SQUARE THE SQUARE FOOT, $3 PER SQUARE FOOT PRICE, AND THANKS FOR YOUR FOOT PRICE, AND THANKS FOR YOUR TIME. TIME. THANKS SO MUCH. THANKS SO MUCH. ANY OTHER REQUESTS TO SPEAK? ANY OTHER REQUESTS TO SPEAK? NO FURTHER REQUESTS TO SPEAK NO FURTHER REQUESTS TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM. ON THIS ITEM. THEN WE WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC THEN WE WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND I WILL ENTERTAIN A HEARING AND I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION. MOTION. JUST A QUICK CLARIFICATION. JUST A QUICK CLARIFICATION. OPTION NUMBER THREE WAS NOT THE OPTION NUMBER THREE WAS NOT THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION? STAFF RECOMMENDATION? THAT WAS TO HAVE A CAVEAT OF THAT WAS TO HAVE A CAVEAT OF CHANGING THE SLIDING SCALE FOR CHANGING THE SLIDING SCALE FOR LARGE HOMES? LARGE HOMES? YES, BUT THE RECOMMENDATION YES, BUT THE RECOMMENDATION BEFORE YOU IS TO GO WITH THE PER BEFORE YOU IS TO GO WITH THE PER SQUARE FOOT BASIS, WHICH WE SQUARE FOOT BASIS, WHICH WE EXPECT TO BE ABOUT A $3 FEE. EXPECT TO BE ABOUT A $3 FEE. GOT IT, PERFECT. GOT IT, PERFECT. I’LL KICK US OFF. I’LL KICK US OFF. I’VE SAID IT MULTIPLE TIMES FROM I’VE SAID IT MULTIPLE TIMES FROM THE DAIS, IT WON’T COME AS A THE DAIS, IT WON’T COME AS A SURPRISE TO ANY OF MY SURPRISE TO ANY OF MY COLLEAGUES, I’M NOT IN FAVOR OF COLLEAGUES, I’M NOT IN FAVOR OF THESE FEES FOR FOR-SALE THESE FEES FOR FOR-SALE CONDOMINIUMS AND TOWNHOMES. CONDOMINIUMS AND TOWNHOMES. I THINK WE NEED MORE STARTER I THINK WE NEED MORE STARTER HOMES OUT THERE AND I THINK HOMES OUT THERE AND I THINK ALTHOUGH THE STUDY MIGHT SHOW ALTHOUGH THE STUDY MIGHT SHOW THAT ALL OF THESE PROTOTYPES ARE THAT ALL OF THESE PROTOTYPES ARE FINANCIALLY KIND OF AT THE CUSP, FINANCIALLY KIND OF AT THE CUSP, OUR EXPERIENCE HAS BEEN A LITTLE OUR EXPERIENCE HAS BEEN A LITTLE BIT DIFFERENT HERE IN FOLSOM. BIT DIFFERENT HERE IN FOLSOM. WE’VE HAD A LOT OF UNITS THAT WE’VE HAD A LOT OF UNITS THAT WERE BUILT HERE, AND I WERE BUILT HERE, AND I UNDERSTAND THERE’S A LOT OF UNDERSTAND THERE’S A LOT OF MOVING PIECES THAT GO INTO THESE MOVING PIECES THAT GO INTO THESE STUDIES, BUT WHEN I LOOK AT IT, STUDIES, BUT WHEN I LOOK AT IT, I THINK OF WHAT ARE WE TRYING TO I THINK OF WHAT ARE WE TRYING TO INCENTIVIZE? INCENTIVIZE? AND I DON’T THINK AND I DON’T THINK DISINCENTIVIZING OR DISINCENTIVIZING OR INCENTIVIZING RENTAL UNITS ABOVE INCENTIVIZING RENTAL UNITS ABOVE FOR-SALE UNITS IS WHAT I WANT TO FOR-SALE UNITS IS WHAT I WANT TO SEE FOR OUR CITY. SEE FOR OUR CITY. IF IT IS A 1500 SQUARE FOOT IF IT IS A 1500 SQUARE FOOT ATTACHED MULTI-FAMILY PROJECT, ATTACHED MULTI-FAMILY PROJECT, WHETHER IT IS A LUXURY APARTMENT WHETHER IT IS A LUXURY APARTMENT OR WHETHER IT’S A CONDO, I DON’T OR WHETHER IT’S A CONDO, I DON’T WANT TO ENCOURAGE THAT BUILDER WANT TO ENCOURAGE THAT BUILDER OR THAT DEVELOPER TO MAKE IT A OR THAT DEVELOPER TO MAKE IT A RENTAL PROJECT VERSUS MAKING IT RENTAL PROJECT VERSUS MAKING IT A FOR-SALE PROJECT. A FOR-SALE PROJECT. AND SO I’M TOTALLY FINE WITH AND SO I’M TOTALLY FINE WITH TRANSITIONING TO A PER SQUARE TRANSITIONING TO A PER SQUARE FOOT FEE, BUT MY REAL CHALLENGE FOOT FEE, BUT MY REAL CHALLENGE IS HOW DO WE LESSEN THE IMPACT. IS HOW DO WE LESSEN THE IMPACT. AND I’M FINE WITH THEM FOR AND I’M FINE WITH THEM FOR SINGLE FAMILY HOMES. SINGLE FAMILY HOMES. THAT’S BEEN THERE, WE’RE STAYING THAT’S BEEN THERE, WE’RE STAYING WITHIN THAT SAME RATE, BUT WITHIN THAT SAME RATE, BUT REALLY THAT SECTION IN THE REALLY THAT SECTION IN THE MIDDLE OF THE MULTI-FAMILY MIDDLE OF THE MULTI-FAMILY PROJECTS IS WHERE I’D LIKE TO PROJECTS IS WHERE I’D LIKE TO SEE WHAT YOU GUYS’ THOUGHTS ARE SEE WHAT YOU GUYS’ THOUGHTS ARE ON JUST REMOVING THE FEE ON JUST REMOVING THE FEE ENTIRELY FOR THOSE TRANCHE OF ENTIRELY FOR THOSE TRANCHE OF PROJECTS. PROJECTS. OR ALTERNATIVELY, AND THIS IS OR ALTERNATIVELY, AND THIS IS MAYBE A LITTLE TOUGHER WITH EPS’ MAYBE A LITTLE TOUGHER WITH EPS’ ANALYSIS, MAKING THE RENTAL ANALYSIS, MAKING THE RENTAL PROJECTS PAY THAT FEE. PROJECTS PAY THAT FEE. LIKE OUR OTHER NEIGHBORING LIKE OUR OTHER NEIGHBORING JURISDICTIONS. JURISDICTIONS. SO MY FIRST PREFERENCE WOULD BE SO MY FIRST PREFERENCE WOULD BE TO GO WITH THE MULTI-FAMILIES TO GO WITH THE MULTI-FAMILIES NOT BEING CHARGED OUR NOT BEING CHARGED OUR INCLUSIONARY HOUSING FEE AND TRY INCLUSIONARY HOUSING FEE AND TRY TO MAKE SOME MORE OF THIS TO MAKE SOME MORE OF THIS NATURALLY ATTAINABLE HOUSING NATURALLY ATTAINABLE HOUSING ATTAINABLE HERE IN FOLSOM. ATTAINABLE HERE IN FOLSOM. SO YOU’RE SAYING THAT YOU SO YOU’RE SAYING THAT YOU WOULD AGREE WITH STAFF’S WOULD AGREE WITH STAFF’S RECOMMENDATION EXCEPT TAKE OUT RECOMMENDATION EXCEPT TAKE OUT THE MULTI-FAMILY? THE MULTI-FAMILY? SO RIGHT NOW, THEY’RE SAYING SO RIGHT NOW, THEY’RE SAYING $3 A SQUARE FOOT FOR SINGLE $3 A SQUARE FOOT FOR SINGLE FAMILY AND CORRECT ME IF I’M FAMILY AND CORRECT ME IF I’M WRONG, DESMOND, BUT 3.50 PER WRONG, DESMOND, BUT 3.50 PER SQUARE FOOT. SQUARE FOOT. THERE WAS A LITTLE BIT OF THERE WAS A LITTLE BIT OF DISCOUNT GIVEN TO THE DISCOUNT GIVEN TO THE MULTI-FAMILY PROJECTS. MULTI-FAMILY PROJECTS. WE REALLY WANT TO INCENTIVIZE WE REALLY WANT TO INCENTIVIZE MORE OF THE CONDO AND TOWN MORE OF THE CONDO AND TOWN HOMOTOWNHOMEPROJECTS TO MAKE IT. HOMOTOWNHOMEPROJECTS TO MAKE IT. DESMOND OR PAM, DO YOU WANT DESMOND OR PAM, DO YOU WANT TO RESPOND IN ANY WAY? TO RESPOND IN ANY WAY? YEAH, SO A COUPLE THINGS WITH YEAH, SO A COUPLE THINGS WITH REGARD TO THAT. REGARD TO THAT. SO AS WE EXPLAINED WITH THE SO AS WE EXPLAINED WITH THE RENTAL PRODUCT, WE DIDN’T WANT RENTAL PRODUCT, WE DIDN’T WANT TO PUT THE BURDEN ON IT, BECAUSE TO PUT THE BURDEN ON IT, BECAUSE IT’S NOT FINANCIALLY FEASIBLE IT’S NOT FINANCIALLY FEASIBLE WITH ABOUT A $40,000 GAP BETWEEN WITH ABOUT A $40,000 GAP BETWEEN WHAT THEY CAN GET IN RENTS AND WHAT THEY CAN GET IN RENTS AND WHAT THEY CAN GET — OR WHAT IT WHAT THEY CAN GET — OR WHAT IT ACTUALLY COSTS TO BUILD. ACTUALLY COSTS TO BUILD. WITH THE MULTI-FAMILY FOR-SALE WITH THE MULTI-FAMILY FOR-SALE PRODUCT, WHEN WE LOOK AT THE PRODUCT, WHEN WE LOOK AT THE TOWNHOMES AND WE LOOK AT THE TOWNHOMES AND WE LOOK AT THE DUPLEXES OR THE HALFPLEXES THAT DUPLEXES OR THE HALFPLEXES THAT ARE BEING SOLD IN THE PLAN AREA, ARE BEING SOLD IN THE PLAN AREA, THOSE ARE, EVEN WITH THE 2.50 THOSE ARE, EVEN WITH THE 2.50 FEE PER SQUARE FOOT FEE, THEY FEE PER SQUARE FOOT FEE, THEY ARE FINANCIALLY FEASIBLE. ARE FINANCIALLY FEASIBLE. THEY’RE RIGHT AT THAT BREAK-EVEN THEY’RE RIGHT AT THAT BREAK-EVEN POINT AS AMY POINTED OUT. POINT AS AMY POINTED OUT. AND THEY’RE ALSO SELLING AT AND THEY’RE ALSO SELLING AT CONSIDERABLY MORE THAN WHAT A CONSIDERABLY MORE THAN WHAT A MODERATE INCOME HOUSEHOLD CAN MODERATE INCOME HOUSEHOLD CAN AFFORD. AFFORD. SO THAT’S WHY WE ELECTED TO KEEP SO THAT’S WHY WE ELECTED TO KEEP THE FEE IN PLACE, BECAUSE THE FEE IN PLACE, BECAUSE THEY’RE SELLING FOR $550,000, AS THEY’RE SELLING FOR $550,000, AS AN EXAMPLE, THAT’S CONSIDERABLY AN EXAMPLE, THAT’S CONSIDERABLY MORE THAN WHAT A MODERATE INCOME MORE THAN WHAT A MODERATE INCOME HOUSEHOLD CAN AFFORD, WHICH IS HOUSEHOLD CAN AFFORD, WHICH IS ABOUT $415,000. ABOUT $415,000. SO BECAUSE IT’S YET ANOTHER SO BECAUSE IT’S YET ANOTHER PRODUCT THAT CATERS TO HIGHER PRODUCT THAT CATERS TO HIGHER INCOME FOLKS, WE ARE ABLE TO UST INCOME FOLKS, WE ARE ABLE TO UST THAT MONEY OR COLLECT THAT MONEY THAT MONEY OR COLLECT THAT MONEY AND PUT THE IN-LIEU FEE ON THAT AND PUT THE IN-LIEU FEE ON THAT PROJECT, BECAUSE IT DOESN’T PROJECT, BECAUSE IT DOESN’T IMPACT THE FINANCIAL VIABILITY IMPACT THE FINANCIAL VIABILITY OF THAT PROJECT, BUT IT DOES OF THAT PROJECT, BUT IT DOES THEN GIVE US MONEY THAT WE CAN THEN GIVE US MONEY THAT WE CAN THEN USE TO, WHETHER IT’S BUY THEN USE TO, WHETHER IT’S BUY LAND FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING OR LAND FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING OR DO GAP FINANCING ON AFFORDABLE DO GAP FINANCING ON AFFORDABLE PROJECTS OR SUPPORT A PROJECT PROJECTS OR SUPPORT A PROJECT LIKE THE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY LIKE THE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY PROJECT. PROJECT. SO THAT’S KIND OF THE REASONING SO THAT’S KIND OF THE REASONING BEHIND WHERE WE WENT WITH THAT BEHIND WHERE WE WENT WITH THAT APPROACH. APPROACH. MADAM MAYOR? MADAM MAYOR? YES. YES. WHEN I REVIEWED THIS WITH THE WHEN I REVIEWED THIS WITH THE STAFF LAST WEEK, I MADE THE STAFF LAST WEEK, I MADE THE SUGGESTION, BECAUSE I HADN’T SUGGESTION, BECAUSE I HADN’T REALLY THOUGHT IT ALL THE WAY REALLY THOUGHT IT ALL THE WAY THROUGH, AND HONESTLY, I MIGHT THROUGH, AND HONESTLY, I MIGHT BE CHASING A PRODUCT GHOST A BE CHASING A PRODUCT GHOST A LITTLE BIT, BUT THE THING THAT LITTLE BIT, BUT THE THING THAT SESEEMS APPARENT IS THAT NOBODY SESEEMS APPARENT IS THAT NOBODY BUILDS A HOUSE DETACHED THAT IS BUILDS A HOUSE DETACHED THAT IS ANYTHING LESS THAN PROBABLY 16 ANYTHING LESS THAN PROBABLY 16 OR 1800 SQUARE FEET NOWADAYS. OR 1800 SQUARE FEET NOWADAYS. AND THAT IS NOT GOING TO BE AND THAT IS NOT GOING TO BE AFFORDABLE TO THE GROUP THAT AFFORDABLE TO THE GROUP THAT YOU’RE TALKING ABOUT. YOU’RE TALKING ABOUT. SO IN DAYS GONE BY, THERE WERE SO IN DAYS GONE BY, THERE WERE BRAND-NEW TRACT HOMES BUILT ON BRAND-NEW TRACT HOMES BUILT ON SMALL LOTS THAT WERE 1,000 OR SMALL LOTS THAT WERE 1,000 OR 1200 SQUARE FEET AND PEOPLE GREW 1200 SQUARE FEET AND PEOPLE GREW INTO THEM AND EXPANDED THEM OVER INTO THEM AND EXPANDED THEM OVER TIMES. THAT MAY NOT BE A TIMES. THAT MAY NOT BE A FEASIBLE PRODUCT, BUT I THINK IF FEASIBLE PRODUCT, BUT I THINK IF WE WERE GOING TO PUT A FLOOR WE WERE GOING TO PUT A FLOOR WHERE WE ELIMINATED THE FEE, WHERE WE ELIMINATED THE FEE, PERHAPS IT’S JUST FOR ANY PERHAPS IT’S JUST FOR ANY PRODUCT THAT MEETS THIS MODERATE PRODUCT THAT MEETS THIS MODERATE INCOME PRICE RANGE. INCOME PRICE RANGE. SO IF SOMEBODY DOES COME FORWARD SO IF SOMEBODY DOES COME FORWARD WITH A PRODUCT THAT THEY CAN WITH A PRODUCT THAT THEY CAN SELL AT THAT MODERATE SALES SELL AT THAT MODERATE SALES PRICE, AND AGAIN, IT MAY NEVER PRICE, AND AGAIN, IT MAY NEVER HAPPEN, BUT IF THEY CAN HIT HAPPEN, BUT IF THEY CAN HIT THAT, LET’S AT THAT POINT THAT, LET’S AT THAT POINT ELIMINATE THE FEE ON THOSE ELIMINATE THE FEE ON THOSE PROJECTS. PROJECTS. OR ON THAT PRODUCT. OR ON THAT PRODUCT. PRODUCT. PRODUCT. TO HELP IT ALONG. TO HELP IT ALONG. IF THEY’RE TEETERING JUST ON THE IF THEY’RE TEETERING JUST ON THE EDGE OF DOING IT, MAYBE WE CAN EDGE OF DOING IT, MAYBE WE CAN INCENTIVIZE IT WITHOUT HAVING TO INCENTIVIZE IT WITHOUT HAVING TO TRANSFER THE MONEY AROUND AND TRANSFER THE MONEY AROUND AND TRACK IT IN THE SAME WAY. TRACK IT IN THE SAME WAY. IT MIGHT MEET BOTH OF OUR IT MIGHT MEET BOTH OF OUR OBJECTIVES. OBJECTIVES. THAT’S AN APPROACH TO TAKE. THAT’S AN APPROACH TO TAKE. I DON’T THINK THESE ARE THAT FAR I DON’T THINK THESE ARE THAT FAR OUT OF THE RANGE OF YOUR OUT OF THE RANGE OF YOUR MODERATE INCOME FOLKS, RIGHT? MODERATE INCOME FOLKS, RIGHT? MAYBE WHEN WE’RE TALKING ABOUT MAYBE WHEN WE’RE TALKING ABOUT 130% OF AMI INSTEAD OF 120% OF 130% OF AMI INSTEAD OF 120% OF AMI, TO ME, WHY ARE WE AMI, TO ME, WHY ARE WE DISINCENTIVIZING THEM? DISINCENTIVIZING THEM? THAT’S JUST MY VIEW ON IT. THAT’S JUST MY VIEW ON IT. I DON’T THINK WE NEED TO ADD AN I DON’T THINK WE NEED TO ADD AN EXTRA $5,000. EXTRA $5,000. IT LOOKS LIKE ALL THE PROJECTS IT LOOKS LIKE ALL THE PROJECTS ARE MARGINAL. ARE MARGINAL. I’M TRYING TO TAKE INTO ACCOUNT I’M TRYING TO TAKE INTO ACCOUNT OUR LIVED EXPERIENCE, RIGHT? OUR LIVED EXPERIENCE, RIGHT? WE’VE HAD A REALLY HARD TIME IN WE’VE HAD A REALLY HARD TIME IN THIS CITY BUILDING CONDOS AND THIS CITY BUILDING CONDOS AND TOWNHOMES. TOWNHOMES. YOU KNOW WHAT WE HAVEN’T HAD A YOU KNOW WHAT WE HAVEN’T HAD A HARD TIME BUILDING? HARD TIME BUILDING? LUXURY APARTMENTS. LUXURY APARTMENTS. THE EPS STUDY CAN SAY, YOU KNOW, THE EPS STUDY CAN SAY, YOU KNOW, HERE’S WHAT THE CONDITIONS ARE HERE’S WHAT THE CONDITIONS ARE RIGHT NOW. RIGHT NOW. THAT IS A SNAPSHOT IN TIME WHERE THAT IS A SNAPSHOT IN TIME WHERE WE’RE LIVING WITH REALLY HIGH WE’RE LIVING WITH REALLY HIGH INTEREST RATES AND THESE INTEREST RATES AND THESE PROJECTS ARE QUITE PRICEY. PROJECTS ARE QUITE PRICEY. AND THEY’RE PROBABLY, YOU KNOW, AND THEY’RE PROBABLY, YOU KNOW, SUFFERING FROM THIS TEMPORARY SUFFERING FROM THIS TEMPORARY PERIOD OF REALLY HIGH INTEREST PERIOD OF REALLY HIGH INTEREST RATES. RATES. THAT’S MY GUESS. THAT’S MY GUESS. I DON’T KNOW, I’M NOT THE I DON’T KNOW, I’M NOT THE ECONOMIC CONSULTANT, BUT THAT’S ECONOMIC CONSULTANT, BUT THAT’S MY GUESS. MY GUESS. WE’RE JUST LOOKING AT A SINGLE WE’RE JUST LOOKING AT A SINGLE SNAPSHOT IN TIME AND I THINK SNAPSHOT IN TIME AND I THINK WE’RE NOW MAKING POLICY FOR THE WE’RE NOW MAKING POLICY FOR THE NEXT FIVE TO TEN YEARS BASED ON NEXT FIVE TO TEN YEARS BASED ON THAT LITTLE SNAPSHOT IN TIME. THAT LITTLE SNAPSHOT IN TIME. WE CAN DEBATE WHAT INTEREST WE CAN DEBATE WHAT INTEREST RATE EFFECT IS ON THE PRICE OF RATE EFFECT IS ON THE PRICE OF HOUSING IN THE UNITED STATES. HOUSING IN THE UNITED STATES. I THINK IT’S OPPOSITE OF WHAT I THINK IT’S OPPOSITE OF WHAT YOU’RE SUGGESTING. YOU’RE SUGGESTING. BUT I GUESS MY RECOMMENDATION IS BUT I GUESS MY RECOMMENDATION IS THAT — IT’S BASED ON A COUPLE THAT — IT’S BASED ON A COUPLE OF THINGS. OF THINGS. I’M LOOKING TO TRY TO I’M LOOKING TO TRY TO INCENTIVIZE PEOPLE TO BUILD INCENTIVIZE PEOPLE TO BUILD MARKET-RATE HOUSING THAT CAN MARKET-RATE HOUSING THAT CAN MEET THAT MIDDLE THAT’S MISSING. MEET THAT MIDDLE THAT’S MISSING. BUT ALSO RECOGNIZING THAT THE BUT ALSO RECOGNIZING THAT THE CREDIT THAT WE GET FOR IT IN THE CREDIT THAT WE GET FOR IT IN THE RHNA ACTIVITY IS DIFFERENT IF IT RHNA ACTIVITY IS DIFFERENT IF IT MISSES BY $10,000. MISSES BY $10,000. RIGHT? RIGHT? IF IT ACTUALLY IS MODERATE IF IT ACTUALLY IS MODERATE INCOME, WE GET TO TAKE CREDIT INCOME, WE GET TO TAKE CREDIT FOR IT. FOR IT. IF IT’S MODERATE PLUS $10,000, IF IT’S MODERATE PLUS $10,000, WE DON’T GET TO TAKE CREDIT FOR WE DON’T GET TO TAKE CREDIT FOR IT. IT. SO IF WE CAN HELP THAT ALONG, IT SO IF WE CAN HELP THAT ALONG, IT SAVES US THE TROUBLE OF FINDING SAVES US THE TROUBLE OF FINDING OTHER PROJECTS THAT DO IN FACT OTHER PROJECTS THAT DO IN FACT MEET THAT MODERATE PRICE RANGE. MEET THAT MODERATE PRICE RANGE. SO THAT’S MY SUGGESTION. SO THAT’S MY SUGGESTION. WOULD SOMEONE LIKE TO MAKE A WOULD SOMEONE LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION FOR US TO CONSIDER? MOTION FOR US TO CONSIDER? I HAVE ANOTHER QUESTION. I HAVE ANOTHER QUESTION. SO IT SEEMS TO ME THAT THERE ARE SO IT SEEMS TO ME THAT THERE ARE SOME THINGS THAT NEED TO BE SOME THINGS THAT NEED TO BE WORKED OUT HERE BEFORE WE VOTE WORKED OUT HERE BEFORE WE VOTE ON THIS THE WAY THAT IT’S SET ON THIS THE WAY THAT IT’S SET UP. UP. DO STAFF HAVE ANY IDEAS ABOUT DO STAFF HAVE ANY IDEAS ABOUT HOW TO IMPLEMENT WHAT VICE MAYOR HOW TO IMPLEMENT WHAT VICE MAYOR RAITHEL AND COUNCIL MEMBER RAITHEL AND COUNCIL MEMBER KOZLOWSKI ARE SAYING? KOZLOWSKI ARE SAYING? I’M HAVING TROUBLE PUTTING ALL I’M HAVING TROUBLE PUTTING ALL OF THOSE PIECES TOGETHER PLUS OF THOSE PIECES TOGETHER PLUS THESE THREE OPTIONS. THESE THREE OPTIONS. THAT HAVE THAT HAVE BEEN PRESENTED INTO SOMETHING BEEN PRESENTED INTO SOMETHING THAT IS WORKABLE THAT WOULD THAT IS WORKABLE THAT WOULD INCENTIVIZE PEOPLE TO BUILD THE INCENTIVIZE PEOPLE TO BUILD THE SMALLER HOUSING PRODUCTS AS SMALLER HOUSING PRODUCTS AS WELL. WELL. BECAUSE OTHER AREAS ARE BUILDING BECAUSE OTHER AREAS ARE BUILDING THEM. THEM. AND THERE’S STATE LAWS THAT ARE AND THERE’S STATE LAWS THAT ARE ALSO IMPACTING THE ABILITY FOR ALSO IMPACTING THE ABILITY FOR PEOPLE TO BUILD CONDOS AND PEOPLE TO BUILD CONDOS AND ATTACHED HOUSING FOR SALE. ATTACHED HOUSING FOR SALE. SO THAT’S ANOTHER PIECE OF THAT SO THAT’S ANOTHER PIECE OF THAT PUZZLE THAT WE CAN’T SOLVE WITH PUZZLE THAT WE CAN’T SOLVE WITH THIS. THIS. I DO HAVE A SUGGESTION FOR I DO HAVE A SUGGESTION FOR MAKING A MOTION ON THIS THAT MAKING A MOTION ON THIS THAT COULD SERVE BOTH PURPOSES. COULD SERVE BOTH PURPOSES. I’LL SEE IF YOU GUYS CARE TO I’LL SEE IF YOU GUYS CARE TO TAKE I TAKE I SO MY PROPOSAL WOULD BE THAT WE SO MY PROPOSAL WOULD BE THAT WE DO IN FACT APPROVE THE STAFF DO IN FACT APPROVE THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION BUT ASK THEM, RECOMMENDATION BUT ASK THEM, BECAUSE WE HAVE THE LUXURY OF BECAUSE WE HAVE THE LUXURY OF BEING ABLE TO CHANGE THIS AGAIN BEING ABLE TO CHANGE THIS AGAIN AND NOBODY IS GOING TO COMPLAIN AND NOBODY IS GOING TO COMPLAIN IF WE REDUCE FEES, THAT WE ASK IF WE REDUCE FEES, THAT WE ASK THE STAFF TO TAKE ONE MORE LOOK THE STAFF TO TAKE ONE MORE LOOK AT A FLOOR OF SOME SORT TO TRY AT A FLOOR OF SOME SORT TO TRY AND INCENTIVIZE THAT MISSING AND INCENTIVIZE THAT MISSING MIDDLE TYPE DEVELOPMENT THAT MIDDLE TYPE DEVELOPMENT THAT HITS THE RHNA MARK FOR MODERATE HITS THE RHNA MARK FOR MODERATE INCOME AT A LATER DATE. INCOME AT A LATER DATE. THAT WOULD BE MY PROPOSAL. THAT WOULD BE MY PROPOSAL. MADAM MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF MADAM MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL, SO WHAT WE CAN THE COUNCIL, SO WHAT WE CAN PROBABLY DO IS EXACTLY WHAT PROBABLY DO IS EXACTLY WHAT COUNCIL MEMBER KOZLOWSKI COUNCIL MEMBER KOZLOWSKI INDICATED. INDICATED. INTRODUCE AND CONDUCT FIRST INTRODUCE AND CONDUCT FIRST READING OF THIS ORDINANCE AND READING OF THIS ORDINANCE AND DIRECT STAFF TO COME BACK WITH A DIRECT STAFF TO COME BACK WITH A FORMULA OR SOME KIND OF FORMULA OR SOME KIND OF EXEMPTION PROVISION TO BE EXEMPTION PROVISION TO BE INSERTED INTO THIS NEW INSERTED INTO THIS NEW ORDINANCE. ORDINANCE. AT SOME FUTURE DATE. AT SOME FUTURE DATE. BECAUSE YOU’RE TALKING ABOUT BECAUSE YOU’RE TALKING ABOUT EXEMPTING CERTAIN PRODUCTS, SO EXEMPTING CERTAIN PRODUCTS, SO THERE’LL BE AN EXEMPTION THERE’LL BE AN EXEMPTION SECTION. SECTION. IT COULD BE EXEMPTED, BUT IT COULD BE EXEMPTED, BUT RIGHT NOW, STAFF IS ALREADY RIGHT NOW, STAFF IS ALREADY RECOMMENDING A LOWER FEE FOR RECOMMENDING A LOWER FEE FOR THESE PRODUCTS, RIGHT? THESE PRODUCTS, RIGHT? SO THAT’S THE RECOMMENDATION SO THAT’S THE RECOMMENDATION THAT STAFF IS GIVING. THAT STAFF IS GIVING. I’M JUST SAYING A 50-CENT I’M JUST SAYING A 50-CENT DISCOUNT ON A 1500 SQUARE FOOT, DISCOUNT ON A 1500 SQUARE FOOT, WE’RE TALKING ABOUT A WE’RE TALKING ABOUT A $750 DISCOUNT ON YOUR $750 DISCOUNT ON YOUR $5,000 FEE. $5,000 FEE. AM I ROUGHLY IN THE BALLPARK AM I ROUGHLY IN THE BALLPARK THERE? THERE? SO I’M SAYING INSTEAD OF STAFF’S SO I’M SAYING INSTEAD OF STAFF’S RECOMMENDED $750 DISCOUNT TO RECOMMENDED $750 DISCOUNT TO INCENTIVIZE THIS PROJECT, WE INCENTIVIZE THIS PROJECT, WE GIVE THEM A $5,000 DISCOUNT TO GIVE THEM A $5,000 DISCOUNT TO INCENTIVIZE THAT PROJECT. INCENTIVIZE THAT PROJECT. THE OTHER WAY WE COULD LOOK AT THE OTHER WAY WE COULD LOOK AT IT, WHAT’S THE MAXIMUM SQUARE IT, WHAT’S THE MAXIMUM SQUARE FEET, RIGHT? FEET, RIGHT? MY ONLY CONCERN AROUND DOING, MY ONLY CONCERN AROUND DOING, HEY, YOU’RE EXEMPT UP TO 1500 HEY, YOU’RE EXEMPT UP TO 1500 SQUARE FEET, IS THEN WE HAVE SQUARE FEET, IS THEN WE HAVE THIS, LIKE, KIND OF CLIFF, THIS, LIKE, KIND OF CLIFF, RIGHT? RIGHT? WHATEVER WE CALCULATE THE WHATEVER WE CALCULATE THE MODERATE RATE TO BE, ALL OF A MODERATE RATE TO BE, ALL OF A SUDDEN WE DON’T SEE ANY MORE SUDDEN WE DON’T SEE ANY MORE 1500, 1700 SQUARE FOOT — 1500, 1700 SQUARE FOOT — I’M SUGGESTING THAT WE TIE IT I’M SUGGESTING THAT WE TIE IT TO SALE PRICE RATHER THAN — SO TO SALE PRICE RATHER THAN — SO WE KIND OF DO BOTH THINGS. WE KIND OF DO BOTH THINGS. RIGHT NOW, WE HAVE IT TIED TO RIGHT NOW, WE HAVE IT TIED TO SALE PRICE. SALE PRICE. I’M SAYING FOR THAT PARTICULAR I’M SAYING FOR THAT PARTICULAR PRODUCT, WE TIE IT TO SALE PRICE PRODUCT, WE TIE IT TO SALE PRICE AND IF A DEVELOPER COMES FORWARD AND IF A DEVELOPER COMES FORWARD AND CAN D DEMONSTRATE THEY’RE AND CAN D DEMONSTRATE THEY’RE GOING TO MEET THAT SALE PRICE GOING TO MEET THAT SALE PRICE RANGE, THAT GIVES US CREDIT FOR RANGE, THAT GIVES US CREDIT FOR MODERATE INCOME HOUSING THAT WE MODERATE INCOME HOUSING THAT WE THEN PROVIDE A DISCOUNT OF UP TO THEN PROVIDE A DISCOUNT OF UP TO 100% ON THE FEE. 100% ON THE FEE. CAN I MAKE A COMMENT IN HERE? CAN I MAKE A COMMENT IN HERE? YES. YES. I THINK IT’S CLEAR THAT I I THINK IT’S CLEAR THAT I KNOW THAT SARAH HAS ALSO KNOW THAT SARAH HAS ALSO ARTICULATED THIS. ARTICULATED THIS. I HAVE AS WELL, AND YOU TOO AS I HAVE AS WELL, AND YOU TOO AS WELL, AND BARBARA, YOU WELL, AND BARBARA, YOU HIGHLIGHTED IT. HIGHLIGHTED IT. THAT WE WANT TO ENCOURAGE THAT WE WANT TO ENCOURAGE CONDOS. CONDOS. AND I THINK STAFF KNOWS THAT AND I THINK STAFF KNOWS THAT THAT’S A PRIORITY OF THIS THAT’S A PRIORITY OF THIS COUNCIL. COUNCIL. SO MAYBE COMING BACK NEXT TIME SO MAYBE COMING BACK NEXT TIME WITH HOW CAN WE DO THAT, HOW CAN WITH HOW CAN WE DO THAT, HOW CAN WE INCENTIVIZE THAT, IF IT’S WE INCENTIVIZE THAT, IF IT’S TIED TO THE FEES OR NOT. TIED TO THE FEES OR NOT. WE’VE HEARD A LOT ABOUT THIS WE’VE HEARD A LOT ABOUT THIS PARTICULAR AGENDA ITEM OR I PARTICULAR AGENDA ITEM OR I HAVE, I’M SURE, EVERY OTHER HAVE, I’M SURE, EVERY OTHER COUNCIL MEMBER HAS AS WELL, BUT COUNCIL MEMBER HAS AS WELL, BUT ONE OF MY PRIORITIES ONE OF MY PRIORITIES CONSISTENTLY SINCE THE BEGINNING CONSISTENTLY SINCE THE BEGINNING WAS TO DELIVER OUR PORTION OF WAS TO DELIVER OUR PORTION OF ANY DEVELOPMENT PROCESS OR ANY DEVELOPMENT PROCESS OR PRODUCT IN A TIMELY AND PRODUCT IN A TIMELY AND OBVIOUSLY ACCURATE BUT TIMELY OBVIOUSLY ACCURATE BUT TIMELY MANNER. MANNER. SOMETHING WE’VE TALKED ABOUT IN SOMETHING WE’VE TALKED ABOUT IN THE LAST SEVERAL YEARS. THE LAST SEVERAL YEARS. ALL RIGHT, WOULD YOU LIKE TO ALL RIGHT, WOULD YOU LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION? MAKE A MOTION? MY MOTION IS TO APPROVE THE MY MOTION IS TO APPROVE THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION AND TO ASK STAFF RECOMMENDATION AND TO ASK THE STAFF TO LOOK AT OTHER THE STAFF TO LOOK AT OTHER INCENTIVES FOR MODERATE INCOME INCENTIVES FOR MODERATE INCOME HOUSING THAT WE CAN INSTITUTE AT HOUSING THAT WE CAN INSTITUTE AT A LATER DATE. A LATER DATE. I’M LOOKING FOR THE STAFF TO I’M LOOKING FOR THE STAFF TO COME BACK WITH A RECOMMENDATION, COME BACK WITH A RECOMMENDATION, BECAUSE AS I STARTED MY BECAUSE AS I STARTED MY COMMENTS, WE MAY BE CHASING A COMMENTS, WE MAY BE CHASING A GHOST. GHOST. TOLL BROTHERS MAY NOT BE TOLL BROTHERS MAY NOT BE INTERESTED IN BUILDING THAT INTERESTED IN BUILDING THAT PARTICULAR PRODUCT AND IT WILL PARTICULAR PRODUCT AND IT WILL COME TO NOTHING, BUT I WANT THE COME TO NOTHING, BUT I WANT THE STAFF TO TAKE A LOOK AT THAT. STAFF TO TAKE A LOOK AT THAT. YEAH, THAT WOULD HELP THEIR YEAH, THAT WOULD HELP THEIR OTHER DEVELOPERS THAT MAY BE OTHER DEVELOPERS THAT MAY BE LOOKING AT THAT KIND OF PRODUCT LOOKING AT THAT KIND OF PRODUCT AS WELL. AS WELL. NO, I UNDERSTAND THAT AND IT’S A NO, I UNDERSTAND THAT AND IT’S A REAL STRUGGLE, SO I JUST WANT TO REAL STRUGGLE, SO I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE WE’RE BEING FAIR TO MAKE SURE WE’RE BEING FAIR TO OURSELVES IN TERMS OF BEING ABLE OURSELVES IN TERMS OF BEING ABLE TO HAVE MONEY TO PURCHASE LAND TO HAVE MONEY TO PURCHASE LAND AND SUPPORT OTHER PROJECTS LIKE AND SUPPORT OTHER PROJECTS LIKE THE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY. THE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY. IS THE INTENTION TO BRING THE IS THE INTENTION TO BRING THE CHANGES BACK FOR THE SECOND CHANGES BACK FOR THE SECOND READING? READING? NO, A LATER DATE. NO, A LATER DATE. MY MOTION IS TO APPROVE THE MY MOTION IS TO APPROVE THE FIRST READING, HAVE IT COME BACK FIRST READING, HAVE IT COME BACK ON ITS REGULAR SCHEDULE SO WE ON ITS REGULAR SCHEDULE SO WE CAN DO THE FINAL READING AND CAN DO THE FINAL READING AND THEN AT SOME POINT OVER THE NEXT THEN AT SOME POINT OVER THE NEXT FEW MONTHS TO GET A NEW FEW MONTHS TO GET A NEW PRESENTATION OF TINKERING. PRESENTATION OF TINKERING. WE’RE GOING TO JUMP TO NEW WE’RE GOING TO JUMP TO NEW BUSINESS 20, APPROVING A MINOR BUSINESS 20, APPROVING A MINOR ADMINISTRATIVE MODIFICATION ADMINISTRATIVE MODIFICATION REQUEST FROM THE FOLSOM-CORDOVA REQUEST FROM THE FOLSOM-CORDOVA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT TO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT TO MODIFY THE FOLSOM PLAN AREA LAND MODIFY THE FOLSOM PLAN AREA LAND USING DESIGNATIONS AND USING DESIGNATIONS AND RESIDENTIAL UNIT ALLOCATION FOR RESIDENTIAL UNIT ALLOCATION FOR DESIGNATED PARCELS TO DESIGNATED PARCELS TO ACCOMMODATE THE RELOCATION OF A ACCOMMODATE THE RELOCATION OF A PLANNED MIDDLE SCHOOL SITE TO A PLANNED MIDDLE SCHOOL SITE TO A LOCATION ADJACENT TO A HIGH LOCATION ADJACENT TO A HIGH SCHOOL SITE. SCHOOL SITE. BEAR WITH ME, SORRY. BEAR WITH ME, SORRY. MY APOLOGIES. MY APOLOGIES. THERE’S SOME TECHNICAL THERE’S SOME TECHNICAL DIFFICULTIES WITH OPENING ONE OF DIFFICULTIES WITH OPENING ONE OF THE … WE’RE HAVING AN ISSUE THE … WE’RE HAVING AN ISSUE WITH THE SCHOOL DISTRICT’S WITH THE SCHOOL DISTRICT’S PowerPoint. PowerPoint. MAYBE I’LL JUST DESCRIBE IT! MAYBE I’LL JUST DESCRIBE IT! WE’LL DO STAFF’S PRESENTATION WE’LL DO STAFF’S PRESENTATION AND THEN IN THE MEANTIME, I’LL AND THEN IN THE MEANTIME, I’LL TRY AND GET THIS ISSUE FIXED. TRY AND GET THIS ISSUE FIXED. SO I’LL TURN IT OVER TO JESSICA SO I’LL TURN IT OVER TO JESSICA BRANDT, PRINCIPAL PLANNER WITH BRANDT, PRINCIPAL PLANNER WITH THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. DEPARTMENT. I’LL GO BEHIND THE SCENES AND I’LL GO BEHIND THE SCENES AND SEE IF I CAN GET IT FIXED ON MY SEE IF I CAN GET IT FIXED ON MY COMPUTER. COMPUTER. THE SUPERINTENDENT CAN THE SUPERINTENDENT CAN PRESENT THROUGH INTERPRETIVE PRESENT THROUGH INTERPRETIVE DANCE! DANCE! ABSOLUTELY! ABSOLUTELY! GOOD EVENING, JESSICA BRANDT GOOD EVENING, JESSICA BRANDT WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, AND WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, AND I’M HERE TO PRESENT THE REQUEST I’M HERE TO PRESENT THE REQUEST FROM FOLSOM-CORDOVA UNIFIED FROM FOLSOM-CORDOVA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICTS FOR A MINOR SCHOOL DISTRICTS FOR A MINOR ADMINISTRATIVE MODIFICATION TO ADMINISTRATIVE MODIFICATION TO THE FOLSOM PLAN AREA SPECIFIC THE FOLSOM PLAN AREA SPECIFIC PLAN TO RELOCATE A PLANNED PLAN TO RELOCATE A PLANNED MIDDLE SCHOOL SITE. MIDDLE SCHOOL SITE. AND AS YOU HEARD, WE DO HAVE A AND AS YOU HEARD, WE DO HAVE A REPRESENTATIVE FROM REPRESENTATIVE FROM FOLSOM-CORDOVA HERE. FOLSOM-CORDOVA HERE. AND THEY WILL HAVE HOPEFULLY AN AND THEY WILL HAVE HOPEFULLY AN APPLICANT PRESENTATION AS WELL. APPLICANT PRESENTATION AS WELL. SO FOLSOM-CORDOVA’S REQUEST IS SO FOLSOM-CORDOVA’S REQUEST IS TO RELOCATE THE MIDDLE SCHOOL TO RELOCATE THE MIDDLE SCHOOL SITE IN THE FOLSOM PLAN AREA AND SITE IN THE FOLSOM PLAN AREA AND THAT REQUIRES A CHANGE TO THE THAT REQUIRES A CHANGE TO THE SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATIONS FOR THE TWO SUBJECT DESIGNATIONS FOR THE TWO SUBJECT SITES AND A TRANSFER OF SITES AND A TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS BETWEEN THE DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS BETWEEN THE PARCELS. PARCELS. BOTH OF WHICH CAN BE BOTH OF WHICH CAN BE ACCOMMODATED FOR A PUBLIC QUASI ACCOMMODATED FOR A PUBLIC QUASI PUBLIC USE LIKE THIS THROUGH A PUBLIC USE LIKE THIS THROUGH A MINOR ADMINISTRATIVE MINOR ADMINISTRATIVE MODIFICATION. MODIFICATION. AND SO KIND OF TO GET IT ON AND SO KIND OF TO GET IT ON RECORD, THE SPECIFIC CHANGES TO RECORD, THE SPECIFIC CHANGES TO THE SPECIFIC PLAN ARE AS THE SPECIFIC PLAN ARE AS FOLLOWS. FOLLOWS. THE EXISTING MIDDLE SCHOOL SITE, THE EXISTING MIDDLE SCHOOL SITE, WHICH IS ABOUT 22 ACRES, WOULD WHICH IS ABOUT 22 ACRES, WOULD BE CHANGED FROM PUBLIC, QUASI BE CHANGED FROM PUBLIC, QUASI PUBLIC, TO SINGLE FAMILY, HIGH PUBLIC, TO SINGLE FAMILY, HIGH DENSITY LAND USE. DENSITY LAND USE. THE PROPOSED MIDDLE SCHOOL SITE, THE PROPOSED MIDDLE SCHOOL SITE, WHICH IS ABOUT 15 ACRES, WOULD WHICH IS ABOUT 15 ACRES, WOULD BE CHANGED FROM SINGLE FAMILY BE CHANGED FROM SINGLE FAMILY HIGH DENSITY LAND USE TO A SPLIT HIGH DENSITY LAND USE TO A SPLIT OF 11.75 ACRES OF PUBLIC, QUASI OF 11.75 ACRES OF PUBLIC, QUASI PUBLIC, AND ABOUT 3.93 ACRES OF PUBLIC, AND ABOUT 3.93 ACRES OF SINGLE FAMILY HIGH DENSITY. SINGLE FAMILY HIGH DENSITY. IN ADDITION TO ACCOMMODATE THE IN ADDITION TO ACCOMMODATE THE REQUEST, 85 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING REQUEST, 85 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS THAT WERE ALLOCATED TO THE UNITS THAT WERE ALLOCATED TO THE PROPOSED MIDDLE SCHOOL SITE AND PROPOSED MIDDLE SCHOOL SITE AND FOUR RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS FOUR RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS FROM ANOTHER RESIDENTIAL SITE FROM ANOTHER RESIDENTIAL SITE WOULD BE TRANSFERRED TO THE WOULD BE TRANSFERRED TO THE EXISTING MIDDLE SCHOOL SITE TO EXISTING MIDDLE SCHOOL SITE TO RETAIN CONSISTENCY WITH LAND USE RETAIN CONSISTENCY WITH LAND USE RESIDENTIAL DENSITY REQUIREMENTS RESIDENTIAL DENSITY REQUIREMENTS AND THE OVERALL UNIT COUNT AND THE OVERALL UNIT COUNT ALLOWED. ALLOWED. THE FOLSOM PLAN AREA SPECIFIC THE FOLSOM PLAN AREA SPECIFIC PLAN INCLUDES POLICY LANGUAGE PLAN INCLUDES POLICY LANGUAGE AND CRITERIA FOR CONSIDERING A AND CRITERIA FOR CONSIDERING A MINOR ADMINISTRATIVE MINOR ADMINISTRATIVE MODIFICATION. MODIFICATION. JUST TO HIGHLIGHT, POLICY 4.24 JUST TO HIGHLIGHT, POLICY 4.24 STATES THAT ALL PUBLIC, STATES THAT ALL PUBLIC, QUASI-PUBLIC SITES MAY BE QUASI-PUBLIC SITES MAY BE RELOCATED OR ABANDONED WITH THE RELOCATED OR ABANDONED WITH THE MINOR ADMINISTRATIVE MINOR ADMINISTRATIVE MODIFICATION PROCESS. MODIFICATION PROCESS. THE LAND USE DESIGNATION OF THE THE LAND USE DESIGNATION OF THE VACATED SITE OR SITES WILL VACATED SITE OR SITES WILL REVERT TO THE LOWEST DENSITY REVERT TO THE LOWEST DENSITY ADJACENT, AND IN NO EVENT SHALL ADJACENT, AND IN NO EVENT SHALL THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF PLAN AREA THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF PLAN AREA DWELLING UNITS ALLOCATED IN THE DWELLING UNITS ALLOCATED IN THE SPECIFIC PLAN BE EXCEEDED. SPECIFIC PLAN BE EXCEEDED. SECTION 13.3, WHICH IS SECTION 13.3, WHICH IS ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES, ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES, STATES THAT ADMINISTRATIVE STATES THAT ADMINISTRATIVE MODIFICATION THAT ARE CONSISTENT MODIFICATION THAT ARE CONSISTENT WITH AND DO NOT SUBSTANTIALLY WITH AND DO NOT SUBSTANTIALLY CHANGE THE OVERALL INTENT OF THE CHANGE THE OVERALL INTENT OF THE SPECIFIC PLAN, SUCH AS MINOR SPECIFIC PLAN, SUCH AS MINOR ADJUSTMENTS TO LAND USE, PARCEL ADJUSTMENTS TO LAND USE, PARCEL BOUNDARIES, LAND USE ACREAGES BOUNDARIES, LAND USE ACREAGES MAY BE APPROVED PROVIDED SEVEN MAY BE APPROVED PROVIDED SEVEN SPECIFIC CRITERIA ARE MET. SPECIFIC CRITERIA ARE MET. I’M NOT GOING TO GO THROUGH ALL I’M NOT GOING TO GO THROUGH ALL SEVEN. SEVEN. THE MAIN ONE HERE IS THAT THE THE MAIN ONE HERE IS THAT THE LAND USE PATTERN REMAINS LAND USE PATTERN REMAINS CONSISTENT WITH THE INTENT OF CONSISTENT WITH THE INTENT OF THE SPECIFIC PLAN. THE SPECIFIC PLAN. THAT THE BACKBONE INFRASTRUCTURE THAT THE BACKBONE INFRASTRUCTURE NETWORK IS NOT SUBSTANTIALLY NETWORK IS NOT SUBSTANTIALLY ALTERED AND THAT THE PROPOSED ALTERED AND THAT THE PROPOSED MODIFICATION DOESN’T INCREASE MODIFICATION DOESN’T INCREASE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS BEYOND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS BEYOND THOSE IDENTIFIED IN THE PLAN THOSE IDENTIFIED IN THE PLAN AREA EIR. AREA EIR. THE PROPOSED MODIFICATION ALSO THE PROPOSED MODIFICATION ALSO NEEDS TO OFFER EQUAL OR BETTER NEEDS TO OFFER EQUAL OR BETTER DEVELOPMENT CAPACITY. DEVELOPMENT CAPACITY. AND THEN SPECIFIC TO THIS AND THEN SPECIFIC TO THIS REQUEST, RELOCATED SCHOOL REQUEST, RELOCATED SCHOOL PARCELS MUST CONTINUE TO MEET PARCELS MUST CONTINUE TO MEET STANDARDS FOR THE TYPE OF SCHOOL STANDARDS FOR THE TYPE OF SCHOOL PROPOSED AND REMAIN WITHIN PROPOSED AND REMAIN WITHIN WALKING DISTANCE OF RESIDENTS WALKING DISTANCE OF RESIDENTS THEY SERVE. THEY SERVE. THERE ARE ALSO ADDITIONAL THERE ARE ALSO ADDITIONAL CRITERIA FOR TRANSFERRING CRITERIA FOR TRANSFERRING DWELLING UNITS THAT MIRROR THESE DWELLING UNITS THAT MIRROR THESE ONES I DISCUSSED. ONES I DISCUSSED. SO FOLSOM-CORDOVA WILL PROVIDE SO FOLSOM-CORDOVA WILL PROVIDE ADDITIONAL DETAIL IN THEIR ADDITIONAL DETAIL IN THEIR PRESENTATION, BUT THIS SLIDE PRESENTATION, BUT THIS SLIDE PROVIDES A SUMMARY OF THEIR PROVIDES A SUMMARY OF THEIR VISION FOR THE COMBINED CAMPUS VISION FOR THE COMBINED CAMPUS THAT WOULD RESULT FROM THE MOVE THAT WOULD RESULT FROM THE MOVE OF THE MIDDLE SCHOOL SITE. OF THE MIDDLE SCHOOL SITE. THEIR VISION INCLUDES IMPROVING THEIR VISION INCLUDES IMPROVING COMMUNICATION FOR STAFF, COMMUNICATION FOR STAFF, ARTICULATION OF INSTRUCTION ARTICULATION OF INSTRUCTION ACROSS GRADE LEVELS, SHARING ACROSS GRADE LEVELS, SHARING FACILITIES THAT MAY NOT FACILITIES THAT MAY NOT OTHERWISE BE AVAILABLE TO MIDDLE OTHERWISE BE AVAILABLE TO MIDDLE SCHOOL STUDENTS, MAINTAINING A SCHOOL STUDENTS, MAINTAINING A SAFE AND COHESIVE CAMPUS, AND SAFE AND COHESIVE CAMPUS, AND THEN MEETING THE DISTRICT SCHOOL THEN MEETING THE DISTRICT SCHOOL TO PROVIDE TIMELY AND TO PROVIDE TIMELY AND COST-EFFICIENT SCHOOL COMPLEX. COST-EFFICIENT SCHOOL COMPLEX. STAFF REVIEWED FOLSOM-CORDOVA’S STAFF REVIEWED FOLSOM-CORDOVA’S REQUEST AND HAVE DETERMINED THAT REQUEST AND HAVE DETERMINED THAT IT MEETS ALL APPLICABLE PLAN IT MEETS ALL APPLICABLE PLAN AREA POLICIES AND THE REQUIRED AREA POLICIES AND THE REQUIRED AND MINOR ADMINISTRATIVE AND MINOR ADMINISTRATIVE MODIFICATION FINDINGS. MODIFICATION FINDINGS. BRIEFLY, THE PROPOSED RELOCATION BRIEFLY, THE PROPOSED RELOCATION IS CONSISTENT WITH PLAN AREA IS CONSISTENT WITH PLAN AREA POLICIES IN THAT THE MIDDLE POLICIES IN THAT THE MIDDLE SCHOOL REMAINS NEAR RESIDENTIAL SCHOOL REMAINS NEAR RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS AND BECAUSE NEIGHBORHOODS AND BECAUSE FOLSOM-CORDOVA WILL PROVIDE FOLSOM-CORDOVA WILL PROVIDE CAMPUS FACILITIES THAT MEET CAMPUS FACILITIES THAT MEET STATE LAW, NEEDS OF PLAN AREA STATE LAW, NEEDS OF PLAN AREA RESIDENTS, AND IT WILL NOT RESIDENTS, AND IT WILL NOT BURDEN FOLSOM RESIDENTS OUTSIDE BURDEN FOLSOM RESIDENTS OUTSIDE OF THE PLAN AREA FINANCIALLY. OF THE PLAN AREA FINANCIALLY. THE RELOCATION DOES NOT MODIFY THE RELOCATION DOES NOT MODIFY THE GENERAL LAND USE PATTERN OF THE GENERAL LAND USE PATTERN OF THE SPECIFIC PLAN AND AGAIN, THE SPECIFIC PLAN AND AGAIN, FOLSOM-CORDOVA MAY TALK ABOUT FOLSOM-CORDOVA MAY TALK ABOUT THIS, BUT A COMBINED HIGH THIS, BUT A COMBINED HIGH SCHOOL/MIDDLE SCHOOL CAMPUS WAS SCHOOL/MIDDLE SCHOOL CAMPUS WAS ACTUALLY ORIGINALLY PROPOSED FOR ACTUALLY ORIGINALLY PROPOSED FOR THE FOLSOM PLAN AREA. THE FOLSOM PLAN AREA. AND SO THIS GOES BACK TO THAT AND SO THIS GOES BACK TO THAT MODEL. MODEL. FURTHER, FOLSOM-CORDOVA PROVIDED FURTHER, FOLSOM-CORDOVA PROVIDED A STUDY THAT DEMONSTRATED THAT A STUDY THAT DEMONSTRATED THAT THE REQUEST WOULD NOT REQUIRE THE REQUEST WOULD NOT REQUIRE SIGNIFICANT ALTERATION TO THE SIGNIFICANT ALTERATION TO THE ROADWAY NETWORK OR RESULT IN ANY ROADWAY NETWORK OR RESULT IN ANY ADDITIONAL SIGNIFICANT TRAFFIC ADDITIONAL SIGNIFICANT TRAFFIC OR OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES. OR OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES. FINALLY, THE RELOCATED SITE FINALLY, THE RELOCATED SITE REMAINS WITHIN A RESIDENTIAL REMAINS WITHIN A RESIDENTIAL AREA AND REDUCES THE ACREAGE AREA AND REDUCES THE ACREAGE NEEDED FOR THE MIDDLE SCHOOL NEEDED FOR THE MIDDLE SCHOOL FROM 22 ACRES TO 12, INCREASING FROM 22 ACRES TO 12, INCREASING SERVICE EFFICIENCY. SERVICE EFFICIENCY. SO WITH THAT, STAFF IS SO WITH THAT, STAFF IS RECOMMENDING THAT THE COUNCIL RECOMMENDING THAT THE COUNCIL MOVE TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NUMBER MOVE TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NUMBER 11512 APPROVING FOLSOM-CORDOVA 11512 APPROVING FOLSOM-CORDOVA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT’S UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT’S REQUEST TO MODIFY THE LAND USE REQUEST TO MODIFY THE LAND USE DESIGNATIONS AND RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATIONS AND RESIDENTIAL UNIT ALLOCATIONS FOR THE UNIT ALLOCATIONS FOR THE DESIGNATED PARCELS THROUGH A DESIGNATED PARCELS THROUGH A MINOR ADMINISTRATIVE MINOR ADMINISTRATIVE MODIFICATION TO ACCOMMODATE THE MODIFICATION TO ACCOMMODATE THE RELOCATION OF THE PLANNED MIDDLE RELOCATION OF THE PLANNED MIDDLE SCHOOL SITE. SCHOOL SITE. THIS COMPLETES MY PRESENTATION THIS COMPLETES MY PRESENTATION AND I’M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY AND I’M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS NOW THAT I’VE GOT MY QUESTIONS NOW THAT I’VE GOT MY BREATH. BREATH. AS MENTIONED AT THE GOING, AS MENTIONED AT THE GOING, CRAIG, DIRECTOR OF FACILITIES, CRAIG, DIRECTOR OF FACILITIES, FINANCE, AND PLANNING WITH FINANCE, AND PLANNING WITH FOLSOM-CORDOVA, IS ALSO HERE AS FOLSOM-CORDOVA, IS ALSO HERE AS THE APPLICANT REPRESENTATIVE AND THE APPLICANT REPRESENTATIVE AND HAS PREPARED REMARKS AS WELL. HAS PREPARED REMARKS AS WELL. THERE’S A PDF ISSUE WITH THIS THERE’S A PDF ISSUE WITH THIS THING. THING. ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? ANY QUESTIONS FOR JESSICA? ANY QUESTIONS FOR JESSICA? SUPER. SUPER. GOOD EVENING. GOOD EVENING. I’M THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR I’M THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR THE FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT FROM THE FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT FROM THE FOLSOM-CORDOVA UNIFIED THE FOLSOM-CORDOVA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT. SCHOOL DISTRICT. I APOLOGIZE FOR THAT! I APOLOGIZE FOR THAT! NEW TO THE JOB! NEW TO THE JOB! OH, BOY, THAT’S NOT A GOOD OH, BOY, THAT’S NOT A GOOD START. START. WE REALLY APPRECIATE THE WE REALLY APPRECIATE THE OPPORTUNITY TO COME SPEAK OPPORTUNITY TO COME SPEAK TONIGHT REGARDING RELOCATING TONIGHT REGARDING RELOCATING THIS MIDDLE SCHOOL SITE AND WE THIS MIDDLE SCHOOL SITE AND WE HAVE A FEW SLIDES HERE TO KIND HAVE A FEW SLIDES HERE TO KIND OF ADD ON TO WHAT WAS JUST OF ADD ON TO WHAT WAS JUST PRESENTED BY STAFF. PRESENTED BY STAFF. WE’LL BE TALKING ABOUT THE NEW WE’LL BE TALKING ABOUT THE NEW MIDDLE SCHOOL, FOLSOM PLANNING MIDDLE SCHOOL, FOLSOM PLANNING AREA AND RELOCATION OF THE AREA AND RELOCATION OF THE MIDDLE SCHOOL SITE. MIDDLE SCHOOL SITE. IN THIS PRESENTATION, WE’LL BE IN THIS PRESENTATION, WE’LL BE TALKING ABOUT THE RELOCATION TALKING ABOUT THE RELOCATION NEED, IDENTIFY THE PURPOSE, NEED, IDENTIFY THE PURPOSE, ADJACENT HIGH SCHOOL, MIDDLE ADJACENT HIGH SCHOOL, MIDDLE SCHOOL SITES, EASING THE SCHOOL SITES, EASING THE GRADE-LEVEL TRANSITIONS AS THEY GRADE-LEVEL TRANSITIONS AS THEY MOVE FROM SIXTH, SEVENTH, AND MOVE FROM SIXTH, SEVENTH, AND EIGHTH INTO THE HIGH SCHOOL. EIGHTH INTO THE HIGH SCHOOL. THE HOLISTIC STUDENT DEVELOPMENT THE HOLISTIC STUDENT DEVELOPMENT AND THEN THE STATUS OF THE AND THEN THE STATUS OF THE DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND MOVING DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND MOVING INTO CONSTRUCTION. INTO CONSTRUCTION. IN 2017, THAT’S WHEN THIS FIRST IN 2017, THAT’S WHEN THIS FIRST STARTED, THE ORIGINAL SCHOOL STARTED, THE ORIGINAL SCHOOL SITE REALLY HAD SOME LIMITATIONS SITE REALLY HAD SOME LIMITATIONS WITH THE ACCESSIBILITY AND THE WITH THE ACCESSIBILITY AND THE TOPOGRAPHY THAT REALLY MADE THE TOPOGRAPHY THAT REALLY MADE THE SITE TOO EXPENSIVE TO EXPLORE TO SITE TOO EXPENSIVE TO EXPLORE TO And based on that assessment And based on that assessment that came back, the district had that came back, the district had to look at splitting the sites to look at splitting the sites and look at a new location for and look at a new location for the middle school and we had the the middle school and we had the support from the land owners and support from the land owners and the city to try and look at the city to try and look at another location and a minor another location and a minor administrative modification was administrative modification was approved by the city for this approved by the city for this purpose. purpose. And then in 2025, moving And then in 2025, moving forward, an effort to achieve forward, an effort to achieve the original vision of the the original vision of the combined high school/middle combined high school/middle school site, the district went school site, the district went back and started talking to the back and started talking to the sty and land owners to see if sty and land owners to see if there was opportunity, as we saw there was opportunity, as we saw earlier, about combining the two earlier, about combining the two sites and moving it over to have sites and moving it over to have the additional 15 acres to have the additional 15 acres to have them on one site. them on one site. SO THE SITE INITIAL DESIGN SO THE SITE INITIAL DESIGN MAINTAINS A DISTINCT PHYSICAL MAINTAINS A DISTINCT PHYSICAL SEPARATION BETWEEN THE TWO SEPARATION BETWEEN THE TWO CAMPUSES SO EVEN THOUGH THEY’RE CAMPUSES SO EVEN THOUGH THEY’RE COMBINED, THEY’RE REALLY SET UP COMBINED, THEY’RE REALLY SET UP TO THEY’RE SEPARATED. TO THEY’RE SEPARATED. SCHOOLS WILL BE STRUCTURED IN A SCHOOLS WILL BE STRUCTURED IN A WAY THERE ARE CLEAR LINES OF WAY THERE ARE CLEAR LINES OF SUPERVISION FROM THE PRINCIPAL SUPERVISION FROM THE PRINCIPAL AND VICE PRINCIPAL’S OFFICES TO AND VICE PRINCIPAL’S OFFICES TO THE RESPECTIVE MIDDLE SCHOOL AND THE RESPECTIVE MIDDLE SCHOOL AND HIGH SCHOOL CAMPUSES. HIGH SCHOOL CAMPUSES. THE STUDENTS WILL BE HOUSED IN THE STUDENTS WILL BE HOUSED IN SEPARATE AREAS OF THE CAMPUS BUT SEPARATE AREAS OF THE CAMPUS BUT STILL HAVE A PERIOD OF TIME TO STILL HAVE A PERIOD OF TIME TO BE SHELTERED FROM OTHER STUDENTS BE SHELTERED FROM OTHER STUDENTS WHILE TRANSITIONING INTO THE NEW WHILE TRANSITIONING INTO THE NEW ENVIRONMENT. ENVIRONMENT. SOME OF THE ADVANTAGES OF HAVING SOME OF THE ADVANTAGES OF HAVING THE ADJACENT HIGH SCHOOL AND THE ADJACENT HIGH SCHOOL AND MIDDLE SCHOOL SITE COMBINED, ONE MIDDLE SCHOOL SITE COMBINED, ONE IS COST. IS COST. THE COST TO BUILD A SCHOOL IS THE COST TO BUILD A SCHOOL IS ABOUT $1,000 A SQUARE FOOT. ABOUT $1,000 A SQUARE FOOT. IT’S REALLY ESCALATED AND COST IT’S REALLY ESCALATED AND COST ESCALATIONS HAS GONE THROUGH THE ESCALATIONS HAS GONE THROUGH THE ROOF. ROOF. BY COMBINING THE SITES HAVING BY COMBINING THE SITES HAVING JOINT-USE BUILDINGS REALLY HELPS JOINT-USE BUILDINGS REALLY HELPS WITH THE OVERALL BUDGET OF A WITH THE OVERALL BUDGET OF A PROJECT OF THAT SIZE. PROJECT OF THAT SIZE. IT PROVIDES THE STUDENTS MORE IT PROVIDES THE STUDENTS MORE FLEXIBILITY. FLEXIBILITY. THE YOUNGER STUDENTS CAN TAKE THE YOUNGER STUDENTS CAN TAKE UPPER-LEVEL COURSES. UPPER-LEVEL COURSES. STUDENTS GET COMFORTABLE WITH STUDENTS GET COMFORTABLE WITH THEIR SURROUNDINGS BEING ON ONE THEIR SURROUNDINGS BEING ON ONE CAMPUS. CAMPUS. BETTER ARTICULATION BETWEEN THE BETTER ARTICULATION BETWEEN THE STAFF AND DIFFERENT GRADE LEVELS STAFF AND DIFFERENT GRADE LEVELS ABILITY TO MAINTAIN CONNECTIONS ABILITY TO MAINTAIN CONNECTIONS AS THEY MOVE FROM MIDDLE SCHOOL AS THEY MOVE FROM MIDDLE SCHOOL TO HIGH SCHOOL AND THEN THE TO HIGH SCHOOL AND THEN THE COLLABORATION BETWEEN THE TWO COLLABORATION BETWEEN THE TWO STAFFS THAT THEY SHARE THE STAFFS THAT THEY SHARE THE ADMIN. BUILDING, OPPORTUNITY FOR ADMIN. BUILDING, OPPORTUNITY FOR THEM TO WORK TOGETHER AND SHARE THEM TO WORK TOGETHER AND SHARE INFORMATION AS THE MIDDLE SCHOOL INFORMATION AS THE MIDDLE SCHOOL STUDENTS TRANSITION INTO THE STUDENTS TRANSITION INTO THE HIGH SCHOOL. HIGH SCHOOL. RESOURCES, BY HAVING THE RESOURCES, BY HAVING THE COMBINED MIDDLE SCHOOL AND HIGH COMBINED MIDDLE SCHOOL AND HIGH SCHOOL SITE, THEY HAVE MORE SCHOOL SITE, THEY HAVE MORE ACCESS TO FIELDS AND CAMPUS ACCESS TO FIELDS AND CAMPUS RESOURCES AND THEN STUDENT RESOURCES AND THEN STUDENT SAFETY AND SECURITY IS SAFETY AND SECURITY IS MAINTAINED IN ALL AREAS OF THE MAINTAINED IN ALL AREAS OF THE CAMPUS. CAMPUS. THE MIDDLE SCHOOL AND HIGH THE MIDDLE SCHOOL AND HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS WILL HAVE NO SCHOOL STUDENTS WILL HAVE NO COMMON AREAS WHERE THEY MIX AND COMMON AREAS WHERE THEY MIX AND VERY LIMITED OPPORTUNITIES TO VERY LIMITED OPPORTUNITIES TO INTERACT. INTERACT. AND THEY WON’T BE UNSUPERVISED AND THEY WON’T BE UNSUPERVISED AS THEY GO THROUGHOUT THEIR DAY. AS THEY GO THROUGHOUT THEIR DAY. SO AS WE EASE INTO THE GRADE SO AS WE EASE INTO THE GRADE LEVEL TRANSITIONS, EACH GRADE LEVEL TRANSITIONS, EACH GRADE LEVEL TRANSITION CREATES LEVEL TRANSITION CREATES EXPOSURE TO AND INTERACTION WITH EXPOSURE TO AND INTERACTION WITH MORE STUDENTS, DIFFERENT MORE STUDENTS, DIFFERENT TEACHERS AND NEW SURROUNDINGS. TEACHERS AND NEW SURROUNDINGS. THE GOAL IS TO STREAMLINE AND THE GOAL IS TO STREAMLINE AND EASE THEM INTO THE TRANSITION, EASE THEM INTO THE TRANSITION, TO MINIMIZE ANXIETY AND REDUCE TO MINIMIZE ANXIETY AND REDUCE ISOLATION TO THE STUDENTS. ISOLATION TO THE STUDENTS. BY FOSTERING A MORE POSITIVE BY FOSTERING A MORE POSITIVE EDUCATIONAL EXPERIENCE. EDUCATIONAL EXPERIENCE. STUDENTS WILL STRIVE TO ADAPT STUDENTS WILL STRIVE TO ADAPT AND RECREATE THEIR IDENTITIES IN AND RECREATE THEIR IDENTITIES IN THEIR NEW SURROUNDINGS. THEIR NEW SURROUNDINGS. THERE IS A NEED TO ESTABLISH THERE IS A NEED TO ESTABLISH ENVIRONMENT WHERE STUDENTS FEEL ENVIRONMENT WHERE STUDENTS FEEL COMFORTABLE AND SAFE. COMFORTABLE AND SAFE. AND THEN PROVIDE SERVICES AND AND THEN PROVIDE SERVICES AND SPACES THAT CONNECT THE STUDENTS SPACES THAT CONNECT THE STUDENTS AND ENGAGE THEM IN THE EDUCATION AND ENGAGE THEM IN THE EDUCATION PROCESS. PROCESS. SO AS OUR ARCHITECTS DESIGNED SO AS OUR ARCHITECTS DESIGNED THESE CAMPUS, THEY REALLY THESE CAMPUS, THEY REALLY IMPLEMENT THESE TALKING POINTS IMPLEMENT THESE TALKING POINTS HERE INTO THE DESIGN SO STUDENTS HERE INTO THE DESIGN SO STUDENTS DO NOT FEEL ISOLATED AND DO NOT FEEL ISOLATED AND THREATENED IF THEY’RE CROSSING THREATENED IF THEY’RE CROSSING OVER THE CAMPUSES. OVER THE CAMPUSES. SO THE STATUS OF THE HIGH SCHOOL SO THE STATUS OF THE HIGH SCHOOL AND MIDDLE SCHOOL PROJECT, THIS AND MIDDLE SCHOOL PROJECT, THIS IS ALL DEPENDENT ON THE HOME IS ALL DEPENDENT ON THE HOME SALES AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE SALES AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE BUILD-OUT WHERE WE’RE AT AND BUILD-OUT WHERE WE’RE AT AND FUNDING AVAILABILITY. FUNDING AVAILABILITY. WE’RE CURRENTLY IN THE DESIGN WE’RE CURRENTLY IN THE DESIGN DEVELOPMENT. DEVELOPMENT. WE HAVE COMPLETED THE SCHEMATIC WE HAVE COMPLETED THE SCHEMATIC DESIGN PHASE AND THEN THE DESIGN PHASE AND THEN THE PROPOSED HIGH SCHOOL START DATE PROPOSED HIGH SCHOOL START DATE IS IN 2027, THAT’S PHASE ONE OF IS IN 2027, THAT’S PHASE ONE OF THE HIGH SCHOOL. THE HIGH SCHOOL. AND THEN BASED ON FUNDING AND AND THEN BASED ON FUNDING AND AVAILABILITY OF THE HOME SALES, AVAILABILITY OF THE HOME SALES, PHASE ONE OF THE MIDDLE SCHOOL PHASE ONE OF THE MIDDLE SCHOOL IS SCHEDULED TO START IN 2029. IS SCHEDULED TO START IN 2029. ANY QUESTIONS? ANY QUESTIONS? THANK YOU, CRAIG. THANK YOU, CRAIG. I ACTUALLY DO HAVE A QUESTION. I ACTUALLY DO HAVE A QUESTION. IF ONE OF THE ADVANTAGES OF IF ONE OF THE ADVANTAGES OF DOING A COMBINED MIDDLE DOING A COMBINED MIDDLE SCHOOL/HIGH SCHOOL CAMPUS IS SCHOOL/HIGH SCHOOL CAMPUS IS COST SAVINGS, WHY DOES YOUR COST SAVINGS, WHY DOES YOUR SCHEMATIC SHOW DOUBLE THE SCHEMATIC SHOW DOUBLE THE ATHLETIC FACILITIES? ATHLETIC FACILITIES? IT SEEMS LIKE THAT IS A NATURAL IT SEEMS LIKE THAT IS A NATURAL AREA WHERE YOU JUST HAVE ONE SET AREA WHERE YOU JUST HAVE ONE SET OF ATHLETIC FACILITIES THAT BOTH OF ATHLETIC FACILITIES THAT BOTH SCHOOLS COULD SHARE? SCHOOLS COULD SHARE? WE’VE GOT TO THINK ABOUT THE WE’VE GOT TO THINK ABOUT THE SIZE OF THE SCHOOLS. SIZE OF THE SCHOOLS. I CAN ANSWER THAT ONE. I CAN ANSWER THAT ONE. WE HAVE A SINGLE SET OF ATHLETIC WE HAVE A SINGLE SET OF ATHLETIC FACULTIES AND THERE IS ALMOST NO FACULTIES AND THERE IS ALMOST NO TIME WHERE THEY ARE NOT IN USE TIME WHERE THEY ARE NOT IN USE ALREADY SO HAVING A ALREADY SO HAVING A COMPLEMENTARY SET IS ALMOST COMPLEMENTARY SET IS ALMOST ESSENTIAL TO RUN REGULAR SPORTS ESSENTIAL TO RUN REGULAR SPORTS PROGRAMS AT THE HIGH SCHOOL PROGRAMS AT THE HIGH SCHOOL LEVEL NOWADAYS. LEVEL NOWADAYS. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. YOU’RE WELCOME. YOU’RE WELCOME. HE’S — HE’S — I WAS ABOUT TO MAKE A I WAS ABOUT TO MAKE A SUGGESTION THAT YOU ACTUALLY, IF SUGGESTION THAT YOU ACTUALLY, IF THE OPPORTUNITY PRESENTS ITSELF, THE OPPORTUNITY PRESENTS ITSELF, ACTUALLY FLIP THE TWO TRACKS, ACTUALLY FLIP THE TWO TRACKS, THE STADIUM AND THE MIDDLE THE STADIUM AND THE MIDDLE SCHOOL TRACK, SO THEY’RE SCHOOL TRACK, SO THEY’RE ADJACENT TO EACH OTHER BECAUSE ADJACENT TO EACH OTHER BECAUSE THERE ARE NO FACILITIES AT A THERE ARE NO FACILITIES AT A HIGH SCHOOL WHERE THERE’S AN HIGH SCHOOL WHERE THERE’S AN OPPORTUNITY TO HAVE A TRACK MEET OPPORTUNITY TO HAVE A TRACK MEET IN A STADIUM AND A WARM-UP IN A STADIUM AND A WARM-UP FACILITY AS GOOD AS WHAT YOU’RE FACILITY AS GOOD AS WHAT YOU’RE SHOWING ADJACENT TO IT. SHOWING ADJACENT TO IT. THE ONLY PLACE WHERE THAT EXISTS THE ONLY PLACE WHERE THAT EXISTS IS AT SAC STATE. IS AT SAC STATE. THAT WOULD BE A FANTASTIC PLACE THAT WOULD BE A FANTASTIC PLACE TO HOST A TRACK MEET IF YOU’RE TO HOST A TRACK MEET IF YOU’RE TO PUT THOSE A LITTLE CLOSER TO TO PUT THOSE A LITTLE CLOSER TO EACH OTHER. EACH OTHER. WE’LL TAKE THAT INTO WE’LL TAKE THAT INTO CONSIDERATION, ABSOLUTELY. CONSIDERATION, ABSOLUTELY. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? QUESTIONS OVER HERE? QUESTIONS OVER HERE? YEAH, MY ONE QUESTION IS YEAH, MY ONE QUESTION IS THERE STILL THE 6, 7, 8 COMBO THERE STILL THE 6, 7, 8 COMBO FOR THE MIDDLE SCHOOLS, YOU FOR THE MIDDLE SCHOOLS, YOU KNOW, THAT’S GONE BACK AND FORTH KNOW, THAT’S GONE BACK AND FORTH WHERE SOMETIMES MIDDLE SCHOOL IS WHERE SOMETIMES MIDDLE SCHOOL IS 7 AND 8, SOMETIMES IT’S 6, 7 AND 7 AND 8, SOMETIMES IT’S 6, 7 AND 8. 8. YES, THERE ARE. YES, THERE ARE. IS THAT THE CURRENT STATUS IS THAT THE CURRENT STATUS FOR MOST STUDENTS OR IS THAT FOR MOST STUDENTS OR IS THAT STILL AN OPTION? STILL AN OPTION? YOU KNOW, THAT SOME KIDS STAY IN YOU KNOW, THAT SOME KIDS STAY IN ELEMENTARY — ELEMENTARY — ALL MIDDLE SCHOOLS ARE 6, 7, ALL MIDDLE SCHOOLS ARE 6, 7, 8. 8. ANY OF THE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS ANY OF THE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS HAVE 6th GRADE ANYMORE? HAVE 6th GRADE ANYMORE? OKAY. OKAY. OKAY. OKAY. AND YOU ALSO HAD MENTIONED AND YOU ALSO HAD MENTIONED SOMETHING ABOUT SHELTERED FROM SOMETHING ABOUT SHELTERED FROM OTHER STUDENTS AND I WASN’T SURE OTHER STUDENTS AND I WASN’T SURE WHAT THAT REFERRED TO. WHAT THAT REFERRED TO. YOU MEAN THERE’S NO INTERACTION YOU MEAN THERE’S NO INTERACTION BETWEEN — BETWEEN — I WAS REALLY FOCUSING ON THE I WAS REALLY FOCUSING ON THE INTERACTION BETWEEN THE HIGH INTERACTION BETWEEN THE HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS AND THE MIDDLE SCHOOL STUDENTS AND THE MIDDLE SCHOOL STUDENTS AND HAVE THAT SCHOOL STUDENTS AND HAVE THAT SEPARATION IN THE CAMPUS. SEPARATION IN THE CAMPUS. AND IS THAT BASICALLY A FENCE AND IS THAT BASICALLY A FENCE OR HOW — OR HOW — IT’S A LINE OF VISION WHERE IT’S A LINE OF VISION WHERE THE STUDENTS WILL NOT CROSS THE STUDENTS WILL NOT CROSS ACROSS. ACROSS. THERE IS A MAIN PATHWAY THAT THERE IS A MAIN PATHWAY THAT THEY CAN — IT’S A LEARNING THEY CAN — IT’S A LEARNING PATHWAY THAT GOES THROUGH THE PATHWAY THAT GOES THROUGH THE BOTH CAMPUSES BUT RIGHT THERE AT BOTH CAMPUSES BUT RIGHT THERE AT THE BUILDING IT’S SPLIT WHERE THE BUILDING IT’S SPLIT WHERE THE MIDDLE SCHOOL STUDENTS STAY THE MIDDLE SCHOOL STUDENTS STAY ON THIS SIDE OF THE CAMPUS AND ON THIS SIDE OF THE CAMPUS AND THEN THE HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS THEN THE HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS WILL STAY OVER HERE AND IT’S WILL STAY OVER HERE AND IT’S GOING TO BE BASICALLY GOING TO BE BASICALLY SUPERVISION. SUPERVISION. KEEP THEM SEPARATED. KEEP THEM SEPARATED. AND ONE OTHER QUESTION, IT’S AND ONE OTHER QUESTION, IT’S ABOUT THE PICKUP AND DROP-OFF ABOUT THE PICKUP AND DROP-OFF WHICH IS ALWAYS A CHALLENGE AT WHICH IS ALWAYS A CHALLENGE AT EVERY SCHOOL FROM ELEMENTARY EVERY SCHOOL FROM ELEMENTARY THROUGH HIGH SCHOOL. THROUGH HIGH SCHOOL. IS THAT GOING TO BE SHARED OR IS THAT GOING TO BE SHARED OR WILL THAT BE A SPLIT SITE? WILL THAT BE A SPLIT SITE? IT WILL BE SPLIT. IT WILL BE SPLIT. BOTH CAMPUSES WILL HAVE THEIR BOTH CAMPUSES WILL HAVE THEIR OWN PICKUP AND DROP-OFF. OWN PICKUP AND DROP-OFF. ON DIFFERENT STREETS? ON DIFFERENT STREETS? SAME STREET. SAME STREET. DIFFERENT TIMES. DIFFERENT TIMES. SO THERE WILL BE DIFFERENT TIMES SO THERE WILL BE DIFFERENT TIMES DROPPING OFF, PICKING UP THAT DROPPING OFF, PICKING UP THAT WILL HAVE TO BE WORKED OUT BUT WILL HAVE TO BE WORKED OUT BUT THERE’S TWO SEPARATE AREAS WHERE THERE’S TWO SEPARATE AREAS WHERE THEY’RE DROPPING UP AND PICKING THEY’RE DROPPING UP AND PICKING UP. UP. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY IS TRAFFIC AND SAFETY IS DIFFICULT TO MANAGE. DIFFICULT TO MANAGE. WE HAVE BEEN WORKING WITH THE WE HAVE BEEN WORKING WITH THE CITY ON THAT. CITY ON THAT. THE TRAFFIC F FLOW AND IF THERES THE TRAFFIC F FLOW AND IF THERES LIGHTS OR ROUNDABOUTS. LIGHTS OR ROUNDABOUTS. WE’RE ON THE DESIGN PHASE HOW WE’RE ON THE DESIGN PHASE HOW THAT’S GOING TO IMPACT DROP-OFF THAT’S GOING TO IMPACT DROP-OFF AND PICKUP. AND PICKUP. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. WE DO HAVE ONE REQUEST TO SPEAK WE DO HAVE ONE REQUEST TO SPEAK FROM THE PUBLIC ON THIS ITEM. FROM THE PUBLIC ON THIS ITEM. MARVIN DUBINSKY, COME ON MARVIN DUBINSKY, COME ON DOWN. DOWN. HELLO AGAIN, TOLL BROTHERS. HELLO AGAIN, TOLL BROTHERS. WE HAVE OWNERSHIP AND WE HAVE OWNERSHIP AND CONTROLLING INTEREST IN THE CONTROLLING INTEREST IN THE PROPERTIES IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT PROPERTIES IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO THE EAST AND IMMEDIATELY TO THE EAST AND IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO THE NORTH OF THIS ADJACENT TO THE NORTH OF THIS PROPOSED SITE AND WE HAVE BEEN PROPOSED SITE AND WE HAVE BEEN WORKING WITH THE SCHOOL DISTRICT WORKING WITH THE SCHOOL DISTRICT TO DO SOME ALIGNMENT OF TO DO SOME ALIGNMENT OF INFRASTRUCTURE AND HELP THEM OUT INFRASTRUCTURE AND HELP THEM OUT WITH A LITTLE BIT OF THEIR WITH A LITTLE BIT OF THEIR DESIGN AND JUST FOR THE RECORD DESIGN AND JUST FOR THE RECORD WANT THE COUNCIL TO KNOW THAT WANT THE COUNCIL TO KNOW THAT TOLL BROTHERS IS IN FULL SUPPORT TOLL BROTHERS IS IN FULL SUPPORT OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE MODIFICATION AND COMBINING THE MODIFICATION AND COMBINING THE TWO SCHOOLS TOGETHER FOR — TWO SCHOOLS TOGETHER FOR — THERE’S A LOT OF THINGS THEY THERE’S A LOT OF THINGS THEY SAID BUT I THINK THAT COST SAID BUT I THINK THAT COST DIFFERENCE, PUTTING TWO SCHOOLS DIFFERENCE, PUTTING TWO SCHOOLS TOGETHER MAKES A LOT OF SENSE TOGETHER MAKES A LOT OF SENSE AND WE’RE IN FULL SUPPORT AND I AND WE’RE IN FULL SUPPORT AND I JUST WANTED COUNCIL TO KNOW THAT JUST WANTED COUNCIL TO KNOW THAT TOLL BROTHERS IS IN FULL SUPPORT TOLL BROTHERS IS IN FULL SUPPORT OF IT. OF IT. THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MARTIN. THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MARTIN. NO OTHER REQUESTS TO SPEAK? NO OTHER REQUESTS TO SPEAK? WE ENTERTAIN A MOTION, PLEASE. WE ENTERTAIN A MOTION, PLEASE. I’LL MOVE RESOLUTION NUMBER I’LL MOVE RESOLUTION NUMBER 11512. 11512. SECOND. SECOND. WE HAVE A MOTION AND SECOND. WE HAVE A MOTION AND SECOND. PLEASE CALL THE ROLL. PLEASE CALL THE ROLL. COUNCILMEMBERS LEARY. COUNCILMEMBERS LEARY. YES. YES. RAITHEL. RAITHEL. YES. YES. ROHRBOUGH. ROHRBOUGH. YES. YES. KOZLOWSKI. KOZLOWSKI. YES. YES. AQUINO. AQUINO. QUESTION. QUESTION. OLD BUSINESS ITEM 16 THAT IS OLD BUSINESS ITEM 16 THAT IS YOU HAVE TEN MORE ITEMS TO GO, YOU HAVE TEN MORE ITEMS TO GO, MADAM MAYOR. MADAM MAYOR. SO ITEM 16 IS GOING TO BE SO ITEM 16 IS GOING TO BE RESOLUTION NUMBER 11522, THIS IS RESOLUTION NUMBER 11522, THIS IS RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH ROMOS STUDIOS FOR THE WITH ROMOS STUDIOS FOR THE FABRICATION, INSTALLATION AND FABRICATION, INSTALLATION AND CONSTRUCTION OF THE JOHNNY CASH CONSTRUCTION OF THE JOHNNY CASH TRAIL ART EXPERIENCE PROJECT TRAIL ART EXPERIENCE PROJECT INCLUDING ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT INCLUDING ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT FUNDS AND APPROPRIATION OF THOSE FUNDS AND APPROPRIATION OF THOSE FUNDS. FUNDS. GOOD EVENING, TOM. GOOD EVENING, TOM. GOOD EVENING, MADAM MAYOR, GOOD EVENING, MADAM MAYOR, COUNCILMEMBERS, CITY MANAGER COUNCILMEMBERS, CITY MANAGER WITH THE PARKS AND RECREATION WITH THE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT. DEPARTMENT. SO TONIGHT I’M GOING TO GIVE YOU SO TONIGHT I’M GOING TO GIVE YOU SOME BACKGROUND TO THE JOHNNY SOME BACKGROUND TO THE JOHNNY CASH TRAIL ART EXPERIENCE CASH TRAIL ART EXPERIENCE PROJECT THAT’S SPANNED OVER A PROJECT THAT’S SPANNED OVER A DECADE. DECADE. I THINK STAFF HAS COME AND GONE, I THINK STAFF HAS COME AND GONE, COUNCILMEMBERS, COMMISSIONERS COUNCILMEMBERS, COMMISSIONERS HAVE COME AND GONE, THIS PROJECT HAVE COME AND GONE, THIS PROJECT CAN GET LOST WITH WHERE WE’VE CAN GET LOST WITH WHERE WE’VE COME FROM TO WHERE WE ARE TODAY. COME FROM TO WHERE WE ARE TODAY. SO THE NEXT SET OF SLIDES WILL SO THE NEXT SET OF SLIDES WILL GIVE YOU SOME INFORMATION BUT AT GIVE YOU SOME INFORMATION BUT AT THE END I WILL BE REQUESTING THE END I WILL BE REQUESTING ACTION FROM THE CITY COUNCIL TO ACTION FROM THE CITY COUNCIL TO AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT TO ADD EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT TO ADD ANOTHER ART EXPERIENCE ON THE ANOTHER ART EXPERIENCE ON THE JOHNNY CASH TRAIL. JOHNNY CASH TRAIL. SO TONIGHT, THIS RESOLUTION SO TONIGHT, THIS RESOLUTION BEFORE YOU IS TO AUTHORIZE THE BEFORE YOU IS TO AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO GO INTO A CITY MANAGER TO GO INTO A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AND CONSULTANT AGREEMENT WITH ROME CONSULTANT AGREEMENT WITH ROME OWES STUDIOS NOT TO EXCEED OWES STUDIOS NOT TO EXCEED AMOUNT OF $79,730 WHICH WILL BE AMOUNT OF $79,730 WHICH WILL BE USED BY GRANT FUNDING FOR THE USED BY GRANT FUNDING FOR THE FABRICATION, INSTALLATION AND FABRICATION, INSTALLATION AND CONSTRUCTION OF HELLO I’M JOHNNY CONSTRUCTION OF HELLO I’M JOHNNY CASH ON THE JOHNNY CASH TRAIL CASH ON THE JOHNNY CASH TRAIL ART EXPERIENCE FROM CALIFORNIA ART EXPERIENCE FROM CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION BUDGET ACT 2023 GRANT RECREATION BUDGET ACT 2023 GRANT FUNDS IN ACCEPTANCE OF THOSE FUNDS IN ACCEPTANCE OF THOSE GRANT FUNDS AND APPROPRIATION OF GRANT FUNDS AND APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS THIS EVENING. FUNDS THIS EVENING. SO ON NOVEMBER 30th, THE ARTS SO ON NOVEMBER 30th, THE ARTS AND CULTURE COMMISSION MET, AND CULTURE COMMISSION MET, SHARED THIS INFORMATION WITH SHARED THIS INFORMATION WITH THEM AND THEY ARE PROVIDING A THEM AND THEY ARE PROVIDING A RECOMMENDATION TO YOU THIS RECOMMENDATION TO YOU THIS EVENING TO MOVE FORWARD WITH EVENING TO MOVE FORWARD WITH ACCEPTING OF THE CALIFORNIA ACCEPTING OF THE CALIFORNIA STATE PARK GRANT FUNDS AS WELL STATE PARK GRANT FUNDS AS WELL AS TO DEVELOP THAT PROFESSIONAL AS TO DEVELOP THAT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH ROMOS SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH ROMOS STUDIOS LLC FOR THE SECOND ART STUDIOS LLC FOR THE SECOND ART EXPERIENCE AND I’LL EXPLAIN MORE EXPERIENCE AND I’LL EXPLAIN MORE ABOUT THIS ART EXPERIENCE IN A ABOUT THIS ART EXPERIENCE IN A LATER SLIDE. LATER SLIDE. COUPLE THINGS RELATED TO THIS COUPLE THINGS RELATED TO THIS PROJECT AS IT RELATES TO THE PROJECT AS IT RELATES TO THE CITY OF FOLSOM STRATEGIC PLAN CITY OF FOLSOM STRATEGIC PLAN IDENTIFIED IN ECONOMIC AND IDENTIFIED IN ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. WE DID A 2024-25 PRIORITY UPDATE WE DID A 2024-25 PRIORITY UPDATE TO IT WHERE WE DEVELOPED THE TO IT WHERE WE DEVELOPED THE FUNDING AND SPONSORSHIP PLAN FOR FUNDING AND SPONSORSHIP PLAN FOR THE JOHNNY CASH TRAIL. THE JOHNNY CASH TRAIL. PART OF THIS PLANNING ALSO PART OF THIS PLANNING ALSO IDENTIFIED THAT 15% OF ALL IDENTIFIED THAT 15% OF ALL TRAFFIC RELATED TO THE JOHNNY TRAFFIC RELATED TO THE JOHNNY CASH TRAIL WEBSITE AND CASH TRAIL WEBSITE AND INFORMATION ABOUT THIS PROJECT INFORMATION ABOUT THIS PROJECT STEMS FROM OUTSIDE OF THE UNITED STEMS FROM OUTSIDE OF THE UNITED STATES WHERE 55% OF THE TRAFFIC STATES WHERE 55% OF THE TRAFFIC IS DOMESTIC TRAFFIC WANTING TO IS DOMESTIC TRAFFIC WANTING TO FIND OUT MORE INFORMATION FIND OUT MORE INFORMATION STEMMING FROM OUTSIDE OF STEMMING FROM OUTSIDE OF CALIFORNIA. CALIFORNIA. SO THERE IS BOTH A NATIONAL AND SO THERE IS BOTH A NATIONAL AND AN INTERNATIONAL DRAW TO THIS AN INTERNATIONAL DRAW TO THIS PROJECT AND WHAT IS GOING ON PROJECT AND WHAT IS GOING ON WITH IT. WITH IT. IN ADDITION, OUR 2024 IN ADDITION, OUR 2024 DEPARTMENT — PARKS AND DEPARTMENT — PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT ANNUAL RECREATION DEPARTMENT ANNUAL REPORT SHARED OVER 173,000 REPORT SHARED OVER 173,000 VISITORS ON THE JOHNNY CASH VISITORS ON THE JOHNNY CASH TRAIL AND THOSE ARE WALKERS, TRAIL AND THOSE ARE WALKERS, BIKERS, CYCLISTS AND THOSE FOLKS BIKERS, CYCLISTS AND THOSE FOLKS THAT USE THAT TRAIL ON A REGULAR THAT USE THAT TRAIL ON A REGULAR BASIS. BASIS. SO THIS MAP IS SHOWING OUR SO THIS MAP IS SHOWING OUR MASTER PLAN WHICH WAS APPROVED MASTER PLAN WHICH WAS APPROVED BACK ON SEPTEMBER 11th, 2018. BACK ON SEPTEMBER 11th, 2018. THE MASTER PLAN IDENTIFIES THE THE MASTER PLAN IDENTIFIES THE ART EXPERIENCE OF THE SELECTED ART EXPERIENCE OF THE SELECTED ARTISTS PROVIDED ON THEIR ARTISTS PROVIDED ON THEIR PROPOSAL. PROPOSAL. THESE ART EXPERIENCES THAT YOU THESE ART EXPERIENCES THAT YOU SEE ARE THEIR CONCEPT PIECES SEE ARE THEIR CONCEPT PIECES THAT THEY INCLUDED WITHIN THEIR THAT THEY INCLUDED WITHIN THEIR PROPOSAL. PROPOSAL. THE TRAIL IS ROUGHLY 2.4 MILES THE TRAIL IS ROUGHLY 2.4 MILES STEMMING EAST TO WEST, ONE PARK STEMMING EAST TO WEST, ONE PARK SITE, TWO BEAUTIFUL PEDESTRIAN SITE, TWO BEAUTIFUL PEDESTRIAN BRIDGES, IT ALSO HAS TRAIL BRIDGES, IT ALSO HAS TRAIL EASEMENTS THROUGH THE CALIFORNIA EASEMENTS THROUGH THE CALIFORNIA STATE PRISON PROPERTY. STATE PRISON PROPERTY. AS WELL AS BUREAU OF RECLAMATION AS WELL AS BUREAU OF RECLAMATION PROPERTY AND CITY OF FOLSOM PROPERTY AND CITY OF FOLSOM PROPERTY. PROPERTY. OF THE EIGHT EXPERIENCES YOU SEE OF THE EIGHT EXPERIENCES YOU SEE THERE, TWO OF THEM ARE NOT ON A THERE, TWO OF THEM ARE NOT ON A CITY OF FOLSOM PROPERTY. CITY OF FOLSOM PROPERTY. THAT WOULD BE THE ONE TO THE FAR THAT WOULD BE THE ONE TO THE FAR EAST CASSIUS PICK UP BY FOLSOM EAST CASSIUS PICK UP BY FOLSOM PICK AND THE RING OF FIRE ON THE PICK AND THE RING OF FIRE ON THE FOLSOM PRISON EASEMENT PROPERTY. FOLSOM PRISON EASEMENT PROPERTY. THE OTHER REMAINING PROJECT THE OTHER REMAINING PROJECT SITES ARE ON THE CITY OF FOLSOM SITES ARE ON THE CITY OF FOLSOM PROPERTY. PROPERTY. SO — CASH’S PICK. SO — CASH’S PICK. DATING BACK TO 2013, THE CITY DATING BACK TO 2013, THE CITY GARNERED INTERESTED ARTISTS. GARNERED INTERESTED ARTISTS. IN 2014, CONCEPTS WERE ADOPTED IN 2014, CONCEPTS WERE ADOPTED AND IN 2019, APPROVAL WAS PASSED AND IN 2019, APPROVAL WAS PASSED FOR THE TWO GUITAR PICKS FOR THE TWO GUITAR PICKS INDICATING THE ENTRANCE AND END INDICATING THE ENTRANCE AND END OF THE TRAIL AND ALSO WE OF THE TRAIL AND ALSO WE EXECUTED AN AGREEMENT WITH ROMO EXECUTED AN AGREEMENT WITH ROMO STUDIO FOR THE CASTING OF CASH’S STUDIO FOR THE CASTING OF CASH’S PICK NUMBER ONE. PICK NUMBER ONE. A FEW YEARS LATER WE CAME BACK A FEW YEARS LATER WE CAME BACK AND PASSED ANOTHER RESOLUTION TO AND PASSED ANOTHER RESOLUTION TO INCREASE THAT COMPENSATION FOR INCREASE THAT COMPENSATION FOR THE CASTING OF CASH’S PICK THE CASTING OF CASH’S PICK NUMBER ONE AND THEN MOST NOTABLY NUMBER ONE AND THEN MOST NOTABLY ON NOVEMBER 21st, THAT FIRST ON NOVEMBER 21st, THAT FIRST PICK WAS INSTALLED ON THE JOHNNY PICK WAS INSTALLED ON THE JOHNNY CASH TRAIL. CASH TRAIL. IN JULY OF 2023, ASSEMBLYMAN IN JULY OF 2023, ASSEMBLYMAN HOOVER’S OFFICE NOTIFIED STAFF HOOVER’S OFFICE NOTIFIED STAFF OF THE SELECTION OF A $425,000 OF THE SELECTION OF A $425,000 SPECIFIED GRANT FOR THE ART SPECIFIED GRANT FOR THE ART EXPERIENCE PROJECT ON THE JOHNNY EXPERIENCE PROJECT ON THE JOHNNY CASH TRAIL AND THEN IN JANUARY, CASH TRAIL AND THEN IN JANUARY, WE COMPLETED THAT STRATEGIC WE COMPLETED THAT STRATEGIC FUNDING PLAN THAT WE TALKED FUNDING PLAN THAT WE TALKED ABOUT AND WE PRESENTED THAT TO ABOUT AND WE PRESENTED THAT TO THE CITY MANAGER AND THE PARKS THE CITY MANAGER AND THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION IN AND RECREATION COMMISSION IN APRIL. APRIL. THEN IN APRIL, WE HAD THE CITY THEN IN APRIL, WE HAD THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE THE SUBMISSION COUNCIL APPROVE THE SUBMISSION OF THE GRANT FUNDING FOR THE OF THE GRANT FUNDING FOR THE SECOND ART EXPERIENCE ON THE SECOND ART EXPERIENCE ON THE JOHNNY CASH TRAIL. JOHNNY CASH TRAIL. AND IN SEPTEMBER, WE BEGAN AND IN SEPTEMBER, WE BEGAN MEETING WITH DON ROMO, THE MEETING WITH DON ROMO, THE ARTIST, TO DISCUSS THE NEXT ART ARTIST, TO DISCUSS THE NEXT ART EXPERIENCE. EXPERIENCE. THROUGHOUT ALL OF THIS, WE WERE THROUGHOUT ALL OF THIS, WE WERE IN COMMUNICATION WITH THE BUREAU IN COMMUNICATION WITH THE BUREAU OF RECLAMATION ABOUT THAT SECOND OF RECLAMATION ABOUT THAT SECOND PICK SITE IN WHICH THEY NOTIFIED PICK SITE IN WHICH THEY NOTIFIED US IN OCTOBER THAT THEY WOULD BE US IN OCTOBER THAT THEY WOULD BE DENYING THAT SITE LICENSE DENYING THAT SITE LICENSE BECAUSE THEY DO NOT ALLOW BECAUSE THEY DO NOT ALLOW MONUMENTS ON FEDERAL LAND. MONUMENTS ON FEDERAL LAND. WE SINCE THEN LOOKED TO MOVE TO WE SINCE THEN LOOKED TO MOVE TO A NEW ART EXPERIENCE SITE AND SO A NEW ART EXPERIENCE SITE AND SO WE MODIFIED OUR PROJECT WE MODIFIED OUR PROJECT AWARENESS WITH CALIFORNIA STATE AWARENESS WITH CALIFORNIA STATE PARKS FOR THAT GRANTING AND WE PARKS FOR THAT GRANTING AND WE RECEIVED APPROVAL IN NOVEMBER TO RECEIVED APPROVAL IN NOVEMBER TO MOVE THAT PROJECT FROM CASH’S MOVE THAT PROJECT FROM CASH’S PICK OVER TO HELLO I’M JOHNNY PICK OVER TO HELLO I’M JOHNNY CASH AS THE SECOND ART CASH AS THE SECOND ART EXPERIENCE SITE. EXPERIENCE SITE. SO THE FUNDING FOR THIS PROJECT SO THE FUNDING FOR THIS PROJECT FOR HELLO I’M JOHNNY CASH AGAIN FOR HELLO I’M JOHNNY CASH AGAIN WAS IDENTIFIED IN THE CALIFORNIA WAS IDENTIFIED IN THE CALIFORNIA BUDGET ACT OF 2023 THANKS TO BUDGET ACT OF 2023 THANKS TO ASSEMBLYMAN JOSH HOOVER FOR THAT ASSEMBLYMAN JOSH HOOVER FOR THAT SUBMISSION NOT SPECIFIED GRANT SUBMISSION NOT SPECIFIED GRANT FUNDS. FUNDS. WE HAVE UNTIL DECEMBER 31st, WE HAVE UNTIL DECEMBER 31st, 2026 TO SPEND THE $425,000. 2026 TO SPEND THE $425,000. WE HAVE AN ART FABRICATION AND WE HAVE AN ART FABRICATION AND INSTALLATION COST OF NOT TO INSTALLATION COST OF NOT TO EXCEED $279,730, THE REMAINING EXCEED $279,730, THE REMAINING $145,000 OF THAT GRANT MONEY $145,000 OF THAT GRANT MONEY WOULD BE USED FOR THE SITE WORK WOULD BE USED FOR THE SITE WORK THAT WE’LL WORK WITH OUR THAT WE’LL WORK WITH OUR LANDSCAPE DESIGN TEAM TO LOOK AT LANDSCAPE DESIGN TEAM TO LOOK AT WHAT WE CAN PROVIDE AT THAT SITE WHAT WE CAN PROVIDE AT THAT SITE AND I’LL EXPLAIN THE SITE IN A AND I’LL EXPLAIN THE SITE IN A LITTLE BIT. LITTLE BIT. SO THIS IS THE PROPOSED ART SO THIS IS THE PROPOSED ART SCULPT YOU’RE, HELLO I’M JOHNNY SCULPT YOU’RE, HELLO I’M JOHNNY CASH THAT ROMO STUDIOS WOULD BE CASH THAT ROMO STUDIOS WOULD BE FABRICATING. FABRICATING. THIS IS A SIX FOOT TALL SCULPT THIS IS A SIX FOOT TALL SCULPT YOU’RE OF JOHNNY CASH SITTING ON YOU’RE OF JOHNNY CASH SITTING ON A STOOL WITH HIS GUITAR SYMBOLIC A STOOL WITH HIS GUITAR SYMBOLIC OF HIS HISTORIC FOLSOM PRISON OF HIS HISTORIC FOLSOM PRISON CONCERT THAT HE PERFORMED HERE CONCERT THAT HE PERFORMED HERE IN 1969. IN 1969. IT IS MADE OF BRONZE ROUGHLY IT IS MADE OF BRONZE ROUGHLY FOUR FEET WIDE, IT WOULD BE A FOUR FEET WIDE, IT WOULD BE A REALISTIC LOOK AND IMAGE OF HIM REALISTIC LOOK AND IMAGE OF HIM BUT AGAIN AS A CONCEPT PIECE BUT AGAIN AS A CONCEPT PIECE YOU’RE LOOKING AT, THE ARTIST YOU’RE LOOKING AT, THE ARTIST DOES HAVE SOME CREATIVE DOES HAVE SOME CREATIVE ABILITIES AS HE’S BEGINNING THIS ABILITIES AS HE’S BEGINNING THIS PROCESS TO MAKE SOME CHANGES TO PROCESS TO MAKE SOME CHANGES TO THAT AND ALL OF THAT WOULD BE THAT AND ALL OF THAT WOULD BE DEFINED WITHIN HIS PROFESSIONAL DEFINED WITHIN HIS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AND CONSULTANT SERVICES AND CONSULTANT AGREEMENTS SCOPE. AGREEMENTS SCOPE. THE ART EXPERIENCE SITE ITSELF THE ART EXPERIENCE SITE ITSELF SITS JUST TO THE WEST OF THE SITS JUST TO THE WEST OF THE JOHNNY CASH BRIDGE SO IT IS ON JOHNNY CASH BRIDGE SO IT IS ON CITY OF FOLSOM PROPERTY. CITY OF FOLSOM PROPERTY. WHAT’S ALSO NICE TO NOTE IS THE WHAT’S ALSO NICE TO NOTE IS THE AREA HERE IS ALREADY PAVED IN AREA HERE IS ALREADY PAVED IN CONCRETE. CONCRETE. WE DID PAVING UP THERE ALREADY WE DID PAVING UP THERE ALREADY OF CONCRETE THAT’S THERE SO OF CONCRETE THAT’S THERE SO THERE’S NO NEED TO COME IN WITH THERE’S NO NEED TO COME IN WITH ADDITIONAL FLAT WORK. ADDITIONAL FLAT WORK. WE WOULD BE LOOKING AT THE SITE WE WOULD BE LOOKING AT THE SITE TO SEE WHAT WOULD BE NEEDED TO SEE WHAT WOULD BE NEEDED BECAUSE THERE IS QUITE A BECAUSE THERE IS QUITE A DROP-OFF HERE SO WE WOULD NEED DROP-OFF HERE SO WE WOULD NEED TO PUT SOME SORT OF WALL OR TO PUT SOME SORT OF WALL OR WHAT’S PROPOSED HERE IS A SMALL WHAT’S PROPOSED HERE IS A SMALL CONCRETE BENCH WITH A SMALL CONCRETE BENCH WITH A SMALL RISER WALL THERE BUT WE WILL RISER WALL THERE BUT WE WILL WORK WITH OUR LANDSCAPE DESIGN WORK WITH OUR LANDSCAPE DESIGN TEAM TO KIND OF FIGURE OUT TEAM TO KIND OF FIGURE OUT WHAT’S THE BEST USE OF THE WHAT’S THE BEST USE OF THE AVAILABLE FUNDING IN ORDER TO AVAILABLE FUNDING IN ORDER TO STREAMLINE THIS PROJECT AND STREAMLINE THIS PROJECT AND PROVIDE THAT. PROVIDE THAT. MUCH LIKE AT CASH’S PICK NUMBER MUCH LIKE AT CASH’S PICK NUMBER ONE, WE WOULD LOOK TO INCLUDE ONE, WE WOULD LOOK TO INCLUDE BIKE RACKS AS PART OF ALL OUR BIKE RACKS AS PART OF ALL OUR ART EXPERIENCE INSTALLATION ART EXPERIENCE INSTALLATION SINCE WE HAVE A LARGE CYCLING SINCE WE HAVE A LARGE CYCLING COMMUNITY IN USE OF THIS PARK — COMMUNITY IN USE OF THIS PARK — SORRY, TRAIL. SORRY, TRAIL. AND THEN WE WOULD LOOK AT WHAT AND THEN WE WOULD LOOK AT WHAT OTHER MATERIALS COULD BE DONE OR OTHER MATERIALS COULD BE DONE OR ADDED THERE BASED UPON THE COSTS ADDED THERE BASED UPON THE COSTS AVAILABLE AND THE AVAILABLE AVAILABLE AND THE AVAILABLE FUNDS AVAILABLE TO US FOR THAT. FUNDS AVAILABLE TO US FOR THAT. SO THAT WOULD BE SOMETHING WE SO THAT WOULD BE SOMETHING WE WOULD BE LOOKING TO IN ADDITION WOULD BE LOOKING TO IN ADDITION TO SEPARATE FROM WHAT I’M ASKING TO SEPARATE FROM WHAT I’M ASKING THE COUNCIL THIS EVENING. THE COUNCIL THIS EVENING. AGAIN, I WANT TO TAKE THIS AGAIN, I WANT TO TAKE THIS MOMENT JUST TO GIVE THANKS TO MOMENT JUST TO GIVE THANKS TO ASSEMBLYMAN JOSH HOOVER WHO IS ASSEMBLYMAN JOSH HOOVER WHO IS INSTRUMENTAL FROM THE BEGINNING INSTRUMENTAL FROM THE BEGINNING IN SECURING GRANT FUNDS FOR US IN SECURING GRANT FUNDS FOR US AND ALSO IN SUPPORT AS WE WORK AND ALSO IN SUPPORT AS WE WORK THROUGH THE PROCESSES AND A THROUGH THE PROCESSES AND A LITTLE BIT OF HURDLES TO GET TO LITTLE BIT OF HURDLES TO GET TO WHERE WE ARE TODAY. WHERE WE ARE TODAY. HE PROVIDED THIS WONDERFUL HE PROVIDED THIS WONDERFUL LETTER OF THE IMPORTANCE OF THIS LETTER OF THE IMPORTANCE OF THIS PROJECT AND WANTING TO SEE IT PROJECT AND WANTING TO SEE IT COME TO COMPLETION SO I JUST COME TO COMPLETION SO I JUST WANT TO GIVE HIM THANKS FOR ALL WANT TO GIVE HIM THANKS FOR ALL OF HIS SUPPORT FOR THAT. OF HIS SUPPORT FOR THAT. AND THEN FINALLY JUST TO ASK YOU AND THEN FINALLY JUST TO ASK YOU FOR THE RECOMMENDATION OF FOR THE RECOMMENDATION OF AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICE EXECUTE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICE AGREEMENT. AGREEMENT. AGAIN THIS IS NOT TO EXCEED AGAIN THIS IS NOT TO EXCEED $279,730 IN GRANT FUNDING FOR $279,730 IN GRANT FUNDING FOR THE FABRICATION, INSTALLATION OF THE FABRICATION, INSTALLATION OF HELLO I’M JOHNNY CASH. HELLO I’M JOHNNY CASH. IN ADDITION, THE ACCEPTANCE OF IN ADDITION, THE ACCEPTANCE OF THE GRANT AND THE APPROPRIATION THE GRANT AND THE APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS. OF FUNDS. WITH THAT, I’LL ANSWER ANY WITH THAT, I’LL ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU MIGHT HAVE. QUESTIONS THAT YOU MIGHT HAVE. ANY QUESTIONS FOR TOM? ANY QUESTIONS FOR TOM? I’LL START THIS SIDE, I’LL START THIS SIDE, COUNCILMEMBER ROHRBOUGH. COUNCILMEMBER ROHRBOUGH. NO. NO. COUNCILMEMBER LEARY. COUNCILMEMBER LEARY. NO. NO. COUNCILMEMBER KOZLOWSKI. COUNCILMEMBER KOZLOWSKI. IS THE WHAT’S DEPICTED ON IS THE WHAT’S DEPICTED ON THERE THE SIMILAR SORT OF RECORD THERE THE SIMILAR SORT OF RECORD IMPRINT PAVING IMMEDIATELY IMPRINT PAVING IMMEDIATELY AROUND THE STATUE, DO YOU AROUND THE STATUE, DO YOU IMAGINE DOING THAT AGAIN? IMAGINE DOING THAT AGAIN? NO, GOOD QUESTION. NO, GOOD QUESTION. NO, THAT IS RELATED JUST TO NO, THAT IS RELATED JUST TO CASH’S PICK NUMBER ONE AS A PICK CASH’S PICK NUMBER ONE AS A PICK THAT’S SITS ON THE GUITAR. THAT’S SITS ON THE GUITAR. THIS IS JUST CONCRETE THAT HE THIS IS JUST CONCRETE THAT HE WOULD BE FASTENED TO AS HE WOULD BE FASTENED TO AS HE STANDS OR SITS THERE. STANDS OR SITS THERE. IS THAT CIRCULAR PAD THAT IS THAT CIRCULAR PAD THAT HE’S SITTING ON GOING TO BE NEW? HE’S SITTING ON GOING TO BE NEW? THE PAD THAT IS THERE, RIGHT THE PAD THAT IS THERE, RIGHT HERE, THIS CONCRETE PAD, IT DOES HERE, THIS CONCRETE PAD, IT DOES HAVE A LITTLE CIRCULAR FORMATION HAVE A LITTLE CIRCULAR FORMATION AND COMES DOWN TO ANOTHER AND COMES DOWN TO ANOTHER CIRCULAR FORMATION SO WE ARE CIRCULAR FORMATION SO WE ARE EXPECTING THAT WE WOULD PLACE EXPECTING THAT WE WOULD PLACE HIM UP IN THIS AREA OF THAT HIM UP IN THIS AREA OF THAT CIRCULAR FORMATION OF THAT PAD. CIRCULAR FORMATION OF THAT PAD. OKAY. OKAY. FOR WHAT IT’S WORTH, ONE OF THE FOR WHAT IT’S WORTH, ONE OF THE VERY COOLEST FEATURES OF THE VERY COOLEST FEATURES OF THE PICK IS THE SURFACE THAT IT’S PICK IS THE SURFACE THAT IT’S SITTING ON AND WE MAYBE DON’T SITTING ON AND WE MAYBE DON’T NEED TO REPLICATE THAT EXACTLY NEED TO REPLICATE THAT EXACTLY BUT SIMILAR TO MY COMMENTS ABOUT BUT SIMILAR TO MY COMMENTS ABOUT THE SCHOOL DISTRICT, IF THE THE SCHOOL DISTRICT, IF THE OPPORTUNITY PRESENTS ITSELF, OPPORTUNITY PRESENTS ITSELF, GROOVING THAT PAVEMENT SO THAT GROOVING THAT PAVEMENT SO THAT IT LOOKS LIKE HE’S SITTING ON A IT LOOKS LIKE HE’S SITTING ON A RECORD WOULD BE PRETTY AWESOME. RECORD WOULD BE PRETTY AWESOME. OKAY, THANK YOU. OKAY, THANK YOU. NO OTHER QUESTIONS. NO OTHER QUESTIONS. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. COUNCILMEMBER RAITHEL? COUNCILMEMBER RAITHEL? NO QUESTIONS. NO QUESTIONS. I DO HAVE A QUESTION, TOM. I DO HAVE A QUESTION, TOM. YOU MENTIONED THAT HE HAS SOME YOU MENTIONED THAT HE HAS SOME SORT OF KIND OF ARTISTIC LICENSE SORT OF KIND OF ARTISTIC LICENSE TO MAKE CHANGES OR WHATEVER, THE TO MAKE CHANGES OR WHATEVER, THE FINAL PRODUCT MAY NOT LOOK LIKE FINAL PRODUCT MAY NOT LOOK LIKE WHAT’S IN THERE. WHAT’S IN THERE. IN THE MASTER PLAN WHERE IT IN THE MASTER PLAN WHERE IT SHOWS A PICTURE OF THE PICK, YOU SHOWS A PICTURE OF THE PICK, YOU KNOW, THERE IS SOME ETCHING OR KNOW, THERE IS SOME ETCHING OR SOMETHING THAT WAS DEPICTED THAT SOMETHING THAT WAS DEPICTED THAT DID NOT HAPPEN WITH THE FINAL DID NOT HAPPEN WITH THE FINAL PRODUCT WHICH I THINK IS A BIT PRODUCT WHICH I THINK IS A BIT DISAPPOINTING IN MANY PEOPLE’S DISAPPOINTING IN MANY PEOPLE’S EYES, WAS THAT KIND OF A SIMILAR EYES, WAS THAT KIND OF A SIMILAR THING, DID WE THINK THERE WAS THING, DID WE THINK THERE WAS GOING TO BE ETCHING ON THE PICK GOING TO BE ETCHING ON THE PICK AND IT WAS THE ARTIST’S DECISION AND IT WAS THE ARTIST’S DECISION NOT TO DO IT? NOT TO DO IT? I’M A LITTLE BIT CONCERNED, YOU I’M A LITTLE BIT CONCERNED, YOU KNOW. KNOW. KNOWING THAT IT MAY NOT COME OUT KNOWING THAT IT MAY NOT COME OUT LOOKING LIKE THAT. LOOKING LIKE THAT. GOOD QUESTION. GOOD QUESTION. I THINK TWO PIECES ARE I THINK TWO PIECES ARE DISTINCTLY DIFFERENT WHERE THERE DISTINCTLY DIFFERENT WHERE THERE WOULD NOT BE THAT SITUATION. WOULD NOT BE THAT SITUATION. I THINK THERE’S A COUPLE THINGS I THINK THERE’S A COUPLE THINGS IN THIS CONCEPT PIECE THAT IN THIS CONCEPT PIECE THAT YOU’RE LOOKING AT HERE THAT DON YOU’RE LOOKING AT HERE THAT DON IS LOOKING TO CREATE WHERE IT’S IS LOOKING TO CREATE WHERE IT’S VERY LIFE SIZE, IT’S LIKE A VERY LIFE SIZE, IT’S LIKE A MOMENT OF YOU STANDING NEXT TO MOMENT OF YOU STANDING NEXT TO JOHNNY CASH AS HE’S SITTING JOHNNY CASH AS HE’S SITTING THERE. THERE. SO HE REALLY WANTS TO CAPTURE SO HE REALLY WANTS TO CAPTURE THAT ESSENCE OF HIM IN FOLSOM IN THAT ESSENCE OF HIM IN FOLSOM IN 1968 AS HE SAT ON A STOOL AS HE 1968 AS HE SAT ON A STOOL AS HE DID WITH MANY PERFORMANCES SO I DID WITH MANY PERFORMANCES SO I DON’T SEE THAT BEING WHERE THE DON’T SEE THAT BEING WHERE THE GUITAR IS GOING TO DISAPPEAR, GUITAR IS GOING TO DISAPPEAR, NO. NO. THE STOOL MAY HAVE SOME THE STOOL MAY HAVE SOME MODIFICATIONS TO IT. MODIFICATIONS TO IT. WE DON’T KNOW YET BUT THAT’S WE DON’T KNOW YET BUT THAT’S STUFF WE BUILD INTO THE STUFF WE BUILD INTO THE CONTRACT, WE WORK WITH THE CONTRACT, WE WORK WITH THE ARTIST AND HE KEEPS US REGULARLY ARTIST AND HE KEEPS US REGULARLY INVOLVED WHAT HIS PROGRESS IS OF INVOLVED WHAT HIS PROGRESS IS OF THE ART SCULPTURE AS HE’S MOVING THE ART SCULPTURE AS HE’S MOVING FORWARD. FORWARD. IN DISCUSSION WITH THE ARTIST IN DISCUSSION WITH THE ARTIST ABOUT THE CONCERNS THAT YOU JUST ABOUT THE CONCERNS THAT YOU JUST BROUGHT UP AND SOME OF THE BROUGHT UP AND SOME OF THE CONCERNS THAT WE’VE HEARD WITHIN CONCERNS THAT WE’VE HEARD WITHIN THE COMMUNITY TO SEE WHAT OUR THE COMMUNITY TO SEE WHAT OUR AVAILABLE OPTIONS ARE, AS OF AVAILABLE OPTIONS ARE, AS OF RIGHT NOW HE HASN’T PROVIDED ME RIGHT NOW HE HASN’T PROVIDED ME WHAT THOSE COULD BE, IF ANY. WHAT THOSE COULD BE, IF ANY. ONE OF THE THINGS THAT AT THE ONE OF THE THINGS THAT AT THE STAFF LEVEL WE’RE LOOKING AT IS STAFF LEVEL WE’RE LOOKING AT IS IDENTIFYING A LITTLE BIT MORE IDENTIFYING A LITTLE BIT MORE WITH THE SIGNAGE THAT IS OUT WITH THE SIGNAGE THAT IS OUT THERE. THERE. RIGHT NOW WE HAVE THE LARGE RIGHT NOW WE HAVE THE LARGE SQUARE SIGNS THAT SAY JOHNNY SQUARE SIGNS THAT SAY JOHNNY CASH TRAIL AND THEN WHAT THE ART CASH TRAIL AND THEN WHAT THE ART EXPERIENCE IS AND MAYBE LOOKING EXPERIENCE IS AND MAYBE LOOKING TO MODIFY THOSE SIGNAGE TO TO MODIFY THOSE SIGNAGE TO INCLUDE A LITTLE MORE OF THE INCLUDE A LITTLE MORE OF THE STORY OF THE ART EXPERIENCE STORY OF THE ART EXPERIENCE ITSELF, WHAT THE SCULPTURE IS ITSELF, WHAT THE SCULPTURE IS SHARING OR SHOWING AS PART OF SHARING OR SHOWING AS PART OF THIS STORY A LITTLE BIT. THIS STORY A LITTLE BIT. BUT WHEN I GET MORE INFORMATION BUT WHEN I GET MORE INFORMATION ABOUT WHAT THE ARTIST MAY OR MAY ABOUT WHAT THE ARTIST MAY OR MAY PROPOSE, THAT’S WHERE I WOULD PROPOSE, THAT’S WHERE I WOULD BRING THAT FORTH TO STAFF AND BRING THAT FORTH TO STAFF AND YOU, OF COURSE. YOU, OF COURSE. GOT IT. GOT IT. MAYOR AQUINO, IF I MAY. MAYOR AQUINO, IF I MAY. I DID ASK STAFF ABOUT THAT I DID ASK STAFF ABOUT THAT BECAUSE I HAD BEEN ON THAT BECAUSE I HAD BEEN ON THAT COMMITTEE AND THAT WAS VISION COMMITTEE AND THAT WAS VISION ALL ALONG, THERE WOULD BE ALL ALONG, THERE WOULD BE WRITING ON IT. WRITING ON IT. AND IT DID LEAVE — I BELIEVE IT AND IT DID LEAVE — I BELIEVE IT WENT BACK TO THE ARTS COMMISSION WENT BACK TO THE ARTS COMMISSION WHEN HE REQUESTED TO MAKE THAT WHEN HE REQUESTED TO MAKE THAT CHANGE. CHANGE. AND IT WAS APPROVED. AND IT WAS APPROVED. CORRECT, YOU ARE CORRECT, CORRECT, YOU ARE CORRECT, COUNCILMEMBER LEARY. COUNCILMEMBER LEARY. SO WE DID READ THE STAFF REPORT SO WE DID READ THE STAFF REPORT AND THERE WAS A VISUAL WITHOUT AND THERE WAS A VISUAL WITHOUT THE LETTERING ON THAT THAT WENT THE LETTERING ON THAT THAT WENT TO COMMISSION AND THEN ALSO TO COMMISSION AND THEN ALSO THERE WAS A STAFF REPORT AND A THERE WAS A STAFF REPORT AND A RENDERING WITHOUT THE LETTERING RENDERING WITHOUT THE LETTERING THAT WENT TO CITY COUNCIL. THAT WENT TO CITY COUNCIL. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. BECAUSE I WAS SURPRISED AS BECAUSE I WAS SURPRISED AS EVERYBODY WHEN I CAME FOR THE EVERYBODY WHEN I CAME FOR THE GRAND UNVEILING OF THE SCULPTURE GRAND UNVEILING OF THE SCULPTURE TO SEE IT WAS NOT WHAT WE HAD TO SEE IT WAS NOT WHAT WE HAD INITIALLY APPROVED. INITIALLY APPROVED. OKAY. OKAY. WE DON’T HAVE ANY REQUESTS TO WE DON’T HAVE ANY REQUESTS TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? SO WE WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION. SO WE WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION. I’D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO I’D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THIS AND WITH THANKS TO APPROVE THIS AND WITH THANKS TO THE LATEST IN A LONG LINE OF THE LATEST IN A LONG LINE OF EXCELLENT ASSEMBLYMEN THAT EXCELLENT ASSEMBLYMEN THAT REPRESENTED THE CITY OF FOLSOM REPRESENTED THE CITY OF FOLSOM SO THANKS TO JOSH HOOVER AND I SO THANKS TO JOSH HOOVER AND I RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THIS. RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THIS. SECOND. SECOND. WE HAVE A MOTION AND A WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. SECOND. PLEASE CALL THE ROLL. PLEASE CALL THE ROLL. COUNCILMEMBER LEARY. COUNCILMEMBER LEARY. YES. YES. RAITHEL. RAITHEL. YES. YES. ROHRBOUGH. ROHRBOUGH. YES. YES. KOZLOWSKI. KOZLOWSKI. YES. YES. AQUINO. AQUINO. YES. YES. NEXT ITEM. NEXT ITEM. ITEM NUMBER 17, APPOINTMENT ITEM NUMBER 17, APPOINTMENT OF AT LARGE MEMBERS TO THE OF AT LARGE MEMBERS TO THE FOLSOM HISTORIC DISTRICT FOLSOM HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION. COMMISSION. OKAY. OKAY. I THINK WE CAN DISPENSE WITH OUR I THINK WE CAN DISPENSE WITH OUR NORMAL BALLOT BECAUSE WE HAVE A NORMAL BALLOT BECAUSE WE HAVE A HANDFUL OF APPLICATIONS HERE. HANDFUL OF APPLICATIONS HERE. FOR THE CATEGORY OF BUSINESS FOR THE CATEGORY OF BUSINESS OWNER WITHIN THE SUTTER STREET OWNER WITHIN THE SUTTER STREET SUBAREA, WE HAVE ONE APPLICANT SUBAREA, WE HAVE ONE APPLICANT WHICH IS LISA GOMEZ. WHICH IS LISA GOMEZ. I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO APPOINT HER TO THE HISTORIC APPOINT HER TO THE HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSIONER. DISTRICT COMMISSIONER. SO MOVED. SO MOVED. SECOND. SECOND. WE HAVE A MOTION AND A WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND, PLEASE CALL THE ROLL. SECOND, PLEASE CALL THE ROLL. COUNCILMEMBER LEARY. COUNCILMEMBER LEARY. YES. YES. RAITHEL. RAITHEL. YES. YES. ROHRBOUGH. ROHRBOUGH. YES. YES. KOZLOWSKI. KOZLOWSKI. YES. YES. AQUINO. AQUINO. YES. YES. RESIDENT OF THE HISTORIC RESIDENT OF THE HISTORIC DISTRICT, WE HAVE TWO DISTRICT, WE HAVE TWO APPLICANTS, ONE IS KATHLEEN APPLICANTS, ONE IS KATHLEEN COLE, THE INCUMBENT, THE OTHER COLE, THE INCUMBENT, THE OTHER IS ROSA VIAS, I ENTERTAIN A IS ROSA VIAS, I ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO APPOINT ONE OF THEM MOTION TO APPOINT ONE OF THEM EITHER KATHLEEN COLE OR ROSA EITHER KATHLEEN COLE OR ROSA VIAS TO THE HISTORIC DISTRICT VIAS TO THE HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION. COMMISSION. I MOVE TO APPOINT KATHLEEN I MOVE TO APPOINT KATHLEEN COLE. COLE. SECOND. SECOND. WE HAVE A MOTION AND A WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. SECOND. COWL THE ROLL. COWL THE ROLL. COUNCILMEMBER LEARY. COUNCILMEMBER LEARY. YES. YES. RAITHEL. RAITHEL. YES. YES. ROHRBOUGH. ROHRBOUGH. YES. YES. KOZLOWSKI. KOZLOWSKI. YES. YES. AQUINO. AQUINO. YES. YES. WE DID NOT RECEIVE ANY WE DID NOT RECEIVE ANY COMPLICATES FOR THE HISTORIC COMPLICATES FOR THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION CATEGORY SO I WOULD PRESERVATION CATEGORY SO I WOULD SUGGEST THAT WE DIRECT STAFF TO SUGGEST THAT WE DIRECT STAFF TO REOPEN THAT ITEM ACCEPT REOPEN THAT ITEM ACCEPT APPLICATIONS AND IF VIAS THINKS APPLICATIONS AND IF VIAS THINKS THAT SHE CAN SATISFY THAT, SHE THAT SHE CAN SATISFY THAT, SHE COULD CERTAINLY APPLY. COULD CERTAINLY APPLY. CAN YOU EXPLAIN JUST SO I CAN YOU EXPLAIN JUST SO I KNOW TOO WHO QUALIFIED FOR THAT? KNOW TOO WHO QUALIFIED FOR THAT? THIS ONE IS A LITTLE BIT THIS ONE IS A LITTLE BIT TRICKY BECAUSE THERE ARE VERY TRICKY BECAUSE THERE ARE VERY FEW PEOPLE THAT ACTUALLY HAVE FEW PEOPLE THAT ACTUALLY HAVE SOME KIND OF A DEGREE AND FORMAL SOME KIND OF A DEGREE AND FORMAL CERTIFICATION AND SO IT’S REALLY CERTIFICATION AND SO IT’S REALLY THE EXPERIENCE, WHEN WE TALKED THE EXPERIENCE, WHEN WE TALKED ABOUT HOW THIS MEMBERSHIP WAS ABOUT HOW THIS MEMBERSHIP WAS INITIALLY IDENTIFIED WITH CANDY INITIALLY IDENTIFIED WITH CANDY MILLER AND OTHERS, I THINK THERE MILLER AND OTHERS, I THINK THERE WAS JUST AGREEMENT THAT SOMEONE WAS JUST AGREEMENT THAT SOMEONE COULD DEMONSTRATE THROUGH THEIR COULD DEMONSTRATE THROUGH THEIR RESUME THAT THEY HAD RESUME THAT THEY HAD QUALIFICATIONS AND INTEREST BUT QUALIFICATIONS AND INTEREST BUT THERE’S NO SET CRITERIA FOR THIS THERE’S NO SET CRITERIA FOR THIS CATEGORY. CATEGORY. SO PRETTY MUCH ANYONE COULD SO PRETTY MUCH ANYONE COULD APPLY AND JUST IN THEIR NOTES APPLY AND JUST IN THEIR NOTES SAY THIS IS MY PASSION, OKAY. SAY THIS IS MY PASSION, OKAY. THAT’S CORRECT. THAT’S CORRECT. MAYBE WE COULD PUT IT BACK MAYBE WE COULD PUT IT BACK OUT THERE WITH THAT KIND OF OUT THERE WITH THAT KIND OF OPENING BUT YEAH, ANYONE CAN OPENING BUT YEAH, ANYONE CAN APPLY. APPLY. IT WOULD BE NICE TO HAVE THE IT WOULD BE NICE TO HAVE THE SEAT FILLED. SEAT FILLED. YEAH, FOR SURE. YEAH, FOR SURE. DO YOU NEED ANYTHING ELSE DO YOU NEED ANYTHING ELSE OFFICIAL ON THAT OTHER THAN JUST OFFICIAL ON THAT OTHER THAN JUST DIRECTION TO — DIRECTION TO — THAT’S FINE. THAT’S FINE. WE’LL REOPEN THAT AND GIVE IT WE’LL REOPEN THAT AND GIVE IT PROBABLY A MONTH JUST WITH THE PROBABLY A MONTH JUST WITH THE HOLIDAYS FOR PEOPLE TO APPLY AND HOLIDAYS FOR PEOPLE TO APPLY AND THEN WE’LL FIND A CLOSING DATE THEN WE’LL FIND A CLOSING DATE AND BRING IT BACK TO THE AND BRING IT BACK TO THE COUNCIL. COUNCIL. OKAY. OKAY. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. NEXT ITEM, PLEASE. NEXT ITEM, PLEASE. OKAY, NEXT ITEM, NUMB NUMBER OKAY, NEXT ITEM, NUMB NUMBER 18, RESOLUTION 11525 18, RESOLUTION 11525 ESTABLISHING THE 2026 AD HOC ESTABLISHING THE 2026 AD HOC CHARTER REVIEW COMMITTEE. CHARTER REVIEW COMMITTEE. GREAT, THANK YOU, MAYOR, GREAT, THANK YOU, MAYOR, MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL. MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL. THIS ITEM IS TO CONSIDER THIS ITEM IS TO CONSIDER CREATING A NEW AD HOC COMMITTEE CREATING A NEW AD HOC COMMITTEE FOR A CHARTER REVIEW. FOR A CHARTER REVIEW. THE CITY CHARTER WAS ADOPTED ON THE CITY CHARTER WAS ADOPTED ON JUNE 5th, 1990 AND THEN ON JUNE 5th, 1990 AND THEN ON JULY 11th, 2000, CITY COUNCIL JULY 11th, 2000, CITY COUNCIL ESTABLISHED AN AD HOC CHARTER ESTABLISHED AN AD HOC CHARTER ADVISORY COMMITTEE AND SO IN ADVISORY COMMITTEE AND SO IN SOME WAYS, WE’RE RECOMMENDING SOME WAYS, WE’RE RECOMMENDING FOLLOWING SIMILAR PATTERN IN FOLLOWING SIMILAR PATTERN IN FORMING A COMMITTEE FOR THIS GO FORMING A COMMITTEE FOR THIS GO AROUND. AROUND. WE THINK IT’S APPROPRIATE BEING WE THINK IT’S APPROPRIATE BEING THE TIME THAT HAS PASSED AND THE TIME THAT HAS PASSED AND THEN ALSO A RECENT COURT CASE THEN ALSO A RECENT COURT CASE POINTED OUT THAT WE HAVE SOME POINTED OUT THAT WE HAVE SOME LANGUAGE THAT COULD UTILIZE SOME LANGUAGE THAT COULD UTILIZE SOME CLEAN-UP AS IT RELATES TO CLEAN-UP AS IT RELATES TO COMMISSIONS AND THEIR ADVISORY COMMISSIONS AND THEIR ADVISORY CAPACITY AND RELATIONSHIP WITH CAPACITY AND RELATIONSHIP WITH THE COUNCIL AND THERE MAY BE THE COUNCIL AND THERE MAY BE OTHER ITEMS THAT THE COMMITTEE OTHER ITEMS THAT THE COMMITTEE MAY WANT TO RECOMMEND THAT THE MAY WANT TO RECOMMEND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL CONSIDER SO JUST AS CITY COUNCIL CONSIDER SO JUST AS A REMINDER, THE AD HOC CHARTER A REMINDER, THE AD HOC CHARTER ADVISORY COMMITTEE THAT WAS ADVISORY COMMITTEE THAT WAS ESTABLISHED IN 2000 WAS MADE UP ESTABLISHED IN 2000 WAS MADE UP OF TWO COUNCILMEMBERS AT THE OF TWO COUNCILMEMBERS AT THE TIME, IT WAS FORMER MAYOR ROBERT TIME, IT WAS FORMER MAYOR ROBERT HOLDERNESS AND FORMER MAYOR GLEN HOLDERNESS AND FORMER MAYOR GLEN FATE. FATE. THERE ARE SEVEN ADDITIONAL THERE ARE SEVEN ADDITIONAL VOTING MEMBERS. VOTING MEMBERS. EACH COUNCIL VOTED ONE EACH COUNCIL VOTED ONE ADDITIONAL MEMBER AND TWO WERE ADDITIONAL MEMBER AND TWO WERE APPOINTED ON THE RECOMMENDATION APPOINTED ON THE RECOMMENDATION OF CITY STAFF. OF CITY STAFF. THEN SERVING MAYOR AND CITY THEN SERVING MAYOR AND CITY MANAGER SERVED AS NONVOTING MANAGER SERVED AS NONVOTING MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE AND MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE AND THEN THE CITY ATTORNEY SERVED AS THEN THE CITY ATTORNEY SERVED AS A LEGAL ADVISER TO THE A LEGAL ADVISER TO THE COMMITTEE. COMMITTEE. CITY STAFF IS RECOMMENDING THAT CITY STAFF IS RECOMMENDING THAT THE COUNCIL CREATE THIS AD HOC THE COUNCIL CREATE THIS AD HOC CHARTER REVIEW COMMITTEE AND CHARTER REVIEW COMMITTEE AND APPROVE RESOLUTION 11525 WITH APPROVE RESOLUTION 11525 WITH ONE MODIFICATION. ONE MODIFICATION. WE’RE RECOMMENDING, ALTHOUGH WE WE’RE RECOMMENDING, ALTHOUGH WE APPRECIATE THE OPPORTUNITY AS APPRECIATE THE OPPORTUNITY AS MENTIONED IN THE PREVIOUS ONE TO MENTIONED IN THE PREVIOUS ONE TO HAVE STAFF RECOMMEND SOME HAVE STAFF RECOMMEND SOME MEMBERS FOR APPOINTING FOR THAT, MEMBERS FOR APPOINTING FOR THAT, IF THE COUNCIL DECIDES TWO IF THE COUNCIL DECIDES TWO COUNCILMEMBERS AND THEN THEY COUNCILMEMBERS AND THEN THEY APPOINT ANOTHER FIVE AND THEN WE APPOINT ANOTHER FIVE AND THEN WE HAVE STAFF SUPPORT RELATED TO HAVE STAFF SUPPORT RELATED TO THAT, WE THINK THAT WOULD BE THAT, WE THINK THAT WOULD BE SUFFICIENT. SUFFICIENT. SO THAT CONCLUDES MY REPORT. SO THAT CONCLUDES MY REPORT. ACTUALLY, AS FAR AS TIMELINE, SO ACTUALLY, AS FAR AS TIMELINE, SO IF THE COUNCIL WERE TO MOVE IF THE COUNCIL WERE TO MOVE FORWARD WITH THIS, IT WOULD BE FORWARD WITH THIS, IT WOULD BE MY EXPECTATION THAT WE WOULD MY EXPECTATION THAT WE WOULD HAVE TO MOVE PRETTY HAVE TO MOVE PRETTY EXPEDITIOUSLY AFTER THE HOLIDAY EXPEDITIOUSLY AFTER THE HOLIDAY SEASON WHERE WE FORM THE SEASON WHERE WE FORM THE COMMITTEE AND STAFF MEETS WITH COMMITTEE AND STAFF MEETS WITH THE COMMITTEE AND PRESENTS THE COMMITTEE AND PRESENTS DIFFERENT OPTIONS AND WE HAVE DIFFERENT OPTIONS AND WE HAVE DISCUSSIONS AND DIALOG AND IN DISCUSSIONS AND DIALOG AND IN ORDER TO MAKE THIS WORTHWHILE, ORDER TO MAKE THIS WORTHWHILE, TO BE ABLE TO GET TO A DECISION TO BE ABLE TO GET TO A DECISION POINT WHETHER OR NOT THE CITY POINT WHETHER OR NOT THE CITY COUNCIL WANTS TO PLACE SOMETHING COUNCIL WANTS TO PLACE SOMETHING ON THE NOVEMBER 2026 BALLOT. ON THE NOVEMBER 2026 BALLOT. AND SO IN ORDER TO DO THAT, OUR AND SO IN ORDER TO DO THAT, OUR RECOMMENDATION WOULD BE TO RECOMMENDATION WOULD BE TO COMPLETE THE REVIEW OF THE COMPLETE THE REVIEW OF THE COMMITTEE AND TO HAVE A FINAL COMMITTEE AND TO HAVE A FINAL RECOMMENDATION FROM THE RECOMMENDATION FROM THE COMMITTEE TO THE CITY COUNCIL IN COMMITTEE TO THE CITY COUNCIL IN MAY OF 2026 SO THAT IT WOULD MAY OF 2026 SO THAT IT WOULD GIVE THE CITY TIME TO GIVE THE CITY TIME TO COMMUNICATE WITH SACRAMENTO COMMUNICATE WITH SACRAMENTO COUNTY ELECTIONS OFFICE TO COUNTY ELECTIONS OFFICE TO PROPERLY PLACE US ON THE BALLOT PROPERLY PLACE US ON THE BALLOT FOR NOVEMBER 2026. FOR NOVEMBER 2026. SO THAT CONCLUDES MY REPORT AND SO THAT CONCLUDES MY REPORT AND I’D BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY I’D BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. QUESTIONS. ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE CITY ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE CITY MANAGER? MANAGER? SO IF THIS PASSES THIS SO IF THIS PASSES THIS EVENING, ARE YOU ANTICIPATING EVENING, ARE YOU ANTICIPATING THAT THE APPOINTMENTS FOR THE THAT THE APPOINTMENTS FOR THE COMMITTEE WOULD BE MADE AT THE COMMITTEE WOULD BE MADE AT THE FIRST JANUARY MEETING? FIRST JANUARY MEETING? YEAH, THAT WOULD BE THE GOAL, YEAH, THAT WOULD BE THE GOAL, YES. YES. OKAY. OKAY. SO YOU’RE RECOMMENDING TWO SO YOU’RE RECOMMENDING TWO COUNCILMEMBERS AND THEN FIVE COUNCILMEMBERS AND THEN FIVE APPOINTED MEMBERS BY EACH APPOINTED MEMBERS BY EACH COUNCILMEMBER AND THEN IT WOULD COUNCILMEMBER AND THEN IT WOULD BE TWO TO THREE STAFF MEMBERS. BE TWO TO THREE STAFF MEMBERS. YEAH, THE STAFF MEMBERS WOULD YEAH, THE STAFF MEMBERS WOULD BE — BE — VOTING. VOTING. VOTING MEMBERS WHO ARE JUST VOTING MEMBERS WHO ARE JUST THERE TO ASSIST AND SO I WOULD THERE TO ASSIST AND SO I WOULD ANTICIPATE THAT THE FINAL ANTICIPATE THAT THE FINAL RECOMMENDATION WOULD BE RECOMMENDATION WOULD BE SUPPORTED BY STAFF BUT AUTHORED SUPPORTED BY STAFF BUT AUTHORED BY THE COMMITTEE WHICH WOULD BE BY THE COMMITTEE WHICH WOULD BE MADE OF TWO COUNCILMEMBERS AND MADE OF TWO COUNCILMEMBERS AND THE FIVE APPOINTED THE FIVE APPOINTED REPRESENTATIVES BY THE COUNCIL. REPRESENTATIVES BY THE COUNCIL. ONE OTHER QUESTION, SORRY. ONE OTHER QUESTION, SORRY. SO IN THE INTERIM, WHEN WE HAVE SO IN THE INTERIM, WHEN WE HAVE A LITTLE BIT MORE TIME AND NOT A A LITTLE BIT MORE TIME AND NOT A LONG AGENDA, IF WE HAVE TIME TO LONG AGENDA, IF WE HAVE TIME TO SUBMIT SOME QUESTIONS ABOUT THE SUBMIT SOME QUESTIONS ABOUT THE CHARTER THINGS THAT WE THINK CHARTER THINGS THAT WE THINK SHOULD PROBABLY BE ADDRESSED, SHOULD PROBABLY BE ADDRESSED, WHO WOULD WE ADDRESS THOSE TO, WHO WOULD WE ADDRESS THOSE TO, WOULD IT BE THE CITY ATTORNEY OR WOULD IT BE THE CITY ATTORNEY OR YOU — YOU — I GUESS WHAT I WOULD SUGGEST, I GUESS WHAT I WOULD SUGGEST, AND OBVIOUSLY THE COUNCIL CAN AND OBVIOUSLY THE COUNCIL CAN DECIDE DIFFERENTLY, IS THAT ONCE DECIDE DIFFERENTLY, IS THAT ONCE THE COMMITTEE IS FORMED, THAT THE COMMITTEE IS FORMED, THAT THE COUNCIL, IF THEY HAD ANY THE COUNCIL, IF THEY HAD ANY PARTICULAR IDEAS, THEY COULD PARTICULAR IDEAS, THEY COULD SUBMIT IT TO THE COMMITTEE TO SUBMIT IT TO THE COMMITTEE TO REVIEW AND EXPLORE IF THAT WOULD REVIEW AND EXPLORE IF THAT WOULD BE SOMETHING THAT WOULD BE BE SOMETHING THAT WOULD BE WORTHWHILE OR NOT AND THEN THEY WORTHWHILE OR NOT AND THEN THEY COULD INCLUDE KIND OF A RESPONSE COULD INCLUDE KIND OF A RESPONSE IN THE REPORT WHETHER THEY WERE IN THE REPORT WHETHER THEY WERE RECOMMENDING THAT THIS IS THE RECOMMENDING THAT THIS IS THE WAY TO GO OR IF THEY SHOULD WAY TO GO OR IF THEY SHOULD MODIFY IT OR COME UP WITH SOME MODIFY IT OR COME UP WITH SOME OTHER ALTERNATIVE. OTHER ALTERNATIVE. OKAY. OKAY. AND I GUESS THAT MIGHT INCLUDE AND I GUESS THAT MIGHT INCLUDE PUBLIC THAT WAS INTERESTED AS PUBLIC THAT WAS INTERESTED AS WELL. WELL. I WOULD EXPECT AS MUCH, I WOULD EXPECT AS MUCH, RIGHT? RIGHT? I MEAN, AS WE PUBLICIZE THIS, I I MEAN, AS WE PUBLICIZE THIS, I THINK WE WOULD WELCOME — THE THINK WE WOULD WELCOME — THE CHARTER ISN’T PARTICULARLY CHARTER ISN’T PARTICULARLY LENGTHY, IT’S NOT LIKE A LENGTHY, IT’S NOT LIKE A 500-PAGE DOCUMENT OR SOME SORT, 500-PAGE DOCUMENT OR SOME SORT, SO THE VARIETY OF OPTIONS FOR SO THE VARIETY OF OPTIONS FOR CHANGE ISN’T SUPER SIGNIFICANT, CHANGE ISN’T SUPER SIGNIFICANT, BUT JUST THINGS SUCH AS THE BUT JUST THINGS SUCH AS THE CHANGE IN STATE LAW RELATED TO CHANGE IN STATE LAW RELATED TO ELECTIONS OF OUR COUNCILMEMBERS ELECTIONS OF OUR COUNCILMEMBERS HAVE CHANGED SO CLEAN-UP HAVE CHANGED SO CLEAN-UP LANGUAGE TO COINCIDE WITH LANGUAGE TO COINCIDE WITH CURRENT LAW MAY BE APPROPRIATE. CURRENT LAW MAY BE APPROPRIATE. GREAT, THANK YOU. GREAT, THANK YOU. OKAY. OKAY. WE HAVE ANOTHER REQUEST TO SPEAK WE HAVE ANOTHER REQUEST TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM SO I WILL ENTERTAIN ON THIS ITEM SO I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION. A MOTION. I WILL MOVE APPROVAL OF I WILL MOVE APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION 11525. RESOLUTION 11525. SECOND. SECOND. JUST AS A CLARIFICATION, THE JUST AS A CLARIFICATION, THE MODIFICATION — THE RESOLUTION MODIFICATION — THE RESOLUTION THAT WAS INCLUDED IN THE PACKET THAT WAS INCLUDED IN THE PACKET HAD TWO ADDITIONAL MEMBERS. HAD TWO ADDITIONAL MEMBERS. IF IT’S OKAY TO EXCLUDE THOSE IF IT’S OKAY TO EXCLUDE THOSE THAT WERE RECOMMENDED BY STAFF. THAT WERE RECOMMENDED BY STAFF. SO IT WOULD BE TWO SO IT WOULD BE TWO COUNCILMEMBERS AND THEN FIVE COUNCILMEMBERS AND THEN FIVE MEMBERS APPOINTED BY EACH, ONE MEMBERS APPOINTED BY EACH, ONE MEMBER APPOINTED BY EACH MEMBER APPOINTED BY EACH COUNCILMEMBER IN THE RESOLUTION, COUNCILMEMBER IN THE RESOLUTION, IT ALSO INCLUDED LANGUAGE THAT IT ALSO INCLUDED LANGUAGE THAT STAFF WOULD RECOMMEND TWO STAFF WOULD RECOMMEND TWO ADDITIONAL MEMBERS. ADDITIONAL MEMBERS. WE’RE SUGGESTING THAT THAT BE WE’RE SUGGESTING THAT THAT BE EXCLUDED. EXCLUDED. OKAY, WITH SOME MODIFICATION OKAY, WITH SOME MODIFICATION DESCRIBED BY THE CITY MANAGER, DESCRIBED BY THE CITY MANAGER, AN AD HOC COMMITTEE OF TWO AN AD HOC COMMITTEE OF TWO COUNCILMEMBER MEMBERS AND FIVE COUNCILMEMBER MEMBERS AND FIVE OTHERS, ONE EACH APPOINTED BY OTHERS, ONE EACH APPOINTED BY COUNCILMEMBERS. COUNCILMEMBERS. SECOND. SECOND. I HAVE A POINT OF I HAVE A POINT OF CLARIFICATION, YOU SAID TWO CLARIFICATION, YOU SAID TWO COUNCILMEMBERS BUT THEN WE HAVE COUNCILMEMBERS BUT THEN WE HAVE THE MAYOR AND CITY MANAGER THE MAYOR AND CITY MANAGER SERVING ON THERE ACCORDING TO SERVING ON THERE ACCORDING TO THE STAFF REPORT SO — THE STAFF REPORT SO — THAT WAS THE OLD VERSION. THAT WAS THE OLD VERSION. NO. NO. WE’RE GOING TO HAVE THREE WE’RE GOING TO HAVE THREE COUNCILMEMBERS — COUNCILMEMBERS — I DID SAY THAT. I DID SAY THAT. SO WE CANNOT DO THAT. SO WE CANNOT DO THAT. OKAY. OKAY. SO IT WOULD BE TWO SO IT WOULD BE TWO COUNCILMEMBERS AND THE CITY COUNCILMEMBERS AND THE CITY MANAGER AS STAFF SUPPORT AND MANAGER AS STAFF SUPPORT AND THEN THE MAKE UP OF ONE THEN THE MAKE UP OF ONE APPOINTEE PER COUNCILMEMBER APPOINTEE PER COUNCILMEMBER AFTER THAT. AFTER THAT. GOT IT. GOT IT. MY MOTION STANDS. MY MOTION STANDS. SOMEBODY SECONDED IT. SOMEBODY SECONDED IT. SECOND STANDS. SECOND STANDS. WE HAVE A MOTION AND A WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. SECOND. PLEASE CALL THE ROLL. PLEASE CALL THE ROLL. COUNCILMEMBER LEARY. COUNCILMEMBER LEARY. YES. YES. RAITT. RAITT. YES. YES. ERROR LAW. ERROR LAW. YES,. YES,. KOZLOWSKI. KOZLOWSKI. YES. YES. AQUINO. AQUINO. YES. YES. RESOLUTION NUMBER 11526 RESOLUTION NUMBER 11526 SCHOOL DISTRICT BOUNDARY AD HOC SCHOOL DISTRICT BOUNDARY AD HOC COMMITTEE. COMMITTEE. I WILL TAKE THIS ONE. I WILL TAKE THIS ONE. THERE IS A PORTION OF AMERICAN THERE IS A PORTION OF AMERICAN RIVER CANYON SO I DON’T KNOW IF RIVER CANYON SO I DON’T KNOW IF WE NEED TO AMEND THE RESOLUTION, WE NEED TO AMEND THE RESOLUTION, THE PORTION OF AMERICAN RIVER THE PORTION OF AMERICAN RIVER CANYON WEST OF AMERICAN RIVER CANYON WEST OF AMERICAN RIVER CANYON DRIVE AND SOUTH OF — CANYON DRIVE AND SOUTH OF — RIGHT? RIGHT? SOUTH OF OAK AVENUE PARKWAY IS SOUTH OF OAK AVENUE PARKWAY IS IN THE SAN JUAN UNIFIED SCHOOL IN THE SAN JUAN UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, THERE IS CURRENTLY AN DISTRICT, THERE IS CURRENTLY AN AGREEMENT THAT’S RECENTLY BEEN AGREEMENT THAT’S RECENTLY BEEN FORMALIZED THAT ALLOWS STUDENTS FORMALIZED THAT ALLOWS STUDENTS IN THAT AREA TO GO EITHER TO IN THAT AREA TO GO EITHER TO THEIR HOME SCHOOLS IN SAN JUAN THEIR HOME SCHOOLS IN SAN JUAN OR TO DO AN INTERDISTRICT OR TO DO AN INTERDISTRICT TRANSFER TO FOLSOM CORDOVA, TRANSFER TO FOLSOM CORDOVA, HOWEVER THAT MOTION PASSED 3-2, HOWEVER THAT MOTION PASSED 3-2, TWO SCHOOL BOARD MEMBERS VOTED TWO SCHOOL BOARD MEMBERS VOTED AGAINST IT, AND WITH THE AGAINST IT, AND WITH THE ENROLLMENT ISSUES, THE IMPACTION ENROLLMENT ISSUES, THE IMPACTION IN FOLSOM CORDOVA, THERE IS A IN FOLSOM CORDOVA, THERE IS A POSSIBILITY IN THE FUTURE THAT POSSIBILITY IN THE FUTURE THAT THOSE STUDENTS LIVING IN FOLSOM THOSE STUDENTS LIVING IN FOLSOM BUT IN THE SAN JUAN DISTRICT BUT IN THE SAN JUAN DISTRICT WOULD NOT HAVE ROOM TO GO TO A WOULD NOT HAVE ROOM TO GO TO A FOLSOM CORDOVA SCHOOL. FOLSOM CORDOVA SCHOOL. THERE IS A PROCESS BY WHICH THE THERE IS A PROCESS BY WHICH THE CITY OF FOLSOM COULD REQUEST TO CITY OF FOLSOM COULD REQUEST TO ANNEX THAT AREA INTO THE FOLSOM ANNEX THAT AREA INTO THE FOLSOM CORDOVA SCHOOL DISTRICT. CORDOVA SCHOOL DISTRICT. WE WOULD LIKE TO APPOINT AN AD WE WOULD LIKE TO APPOINT AN AD HOC COMMITTEE TO EXPLORE THAT HOC COMMITTEE TO EXPLORE THAT PROCESS TO SEE IF THE RESIDENTS PROCESS TO SEE IF THE RESIDENTS IN THAT AREA EVEN HAVE AN IN THAT AREA EVEN HAVE AN INTEREST. INTEREST. IF THEY DON’T, WE’RE DONE. IF THEY DON’T, WE’RE DONE. IF THEY DO, THEN WE CAN EXPLORE IF THEY DO, THEN WE CAN EXPLORE THE PROCESS. THE PROCESS. SO THE RESOLUTION TALKS ABOUT SO THE RESOLUTION TALKS ABOUT COUNCILMEMBERS. COUNCILMEMBERS. I AM PROPOSING THAT IT WOULD BE I AM PROPOSING THAT IT WOULD BE MYSELF AND COUNCILMEMBER MYSELF AND COUNCILMEMBER KOZLOWSKI. KOZLOWSKI. IT’S HIS DISTRICT, I’M A FORMER IT’S HIS DISTRICT, I’M A FORMER SCHOOL BOARD MEMBER. SCHOOL BOARD MEMBER. I’M PROPOSING THAT WE GET RID OF I’M PROPOSING THAT WE GET RID OF “B” ONE APPOINTEE BY EACH “B” ONE APPOINTEE BY EACH COUNCILMEMBER, WE DON’T NEED COUNCILMEMBER, WE DON’T NEED THAT. THAT. “C,” PARENTS OF STUDENTS IN THE “C,” PARENTS OF STUDENTS IN THE AMERICAN RIVER CANYON AMERICAN RIVER CANYON NEIGHBORHOOD, I THINK IT SHOULD NEIGHBORHOOD, I THINK IT SHOULD BE RESIDENTS LIVING IN THE BE RESIDENTS LIVING IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD, AND I AM PROPOSING NEIGHBORHOOD, AND I AM PROPOSING TOM SCOTT, KELLY DUDLEY AND TOM SCOTT, KELLY DUDLEY AND KENDALL GILMORE. KENDALL GILMORE. KELLY AND KENDALL BOTH HAVE KIDS KELLY AND KENDALL BOTH HAVE KIDS IN FOLSOM CORDOVA SCHOOLS AND IN FOLSOM CORDOVA SCHOOLS AND ARE INTERESTED IN THIS PROCESS. ARE INTERESTED IN THIS PROCESS. DO WE NEED TO APPOINT DO WE NEED TO APPOINT INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS? INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS? NO, WE WOULD NOT BE DOING NO, WE WOULD NOT BE DOING THAT. THAT. WHAT’S THAT? WHAT’S THAT? DO WE NEED TO APPOINT — DO WE NEED TO APPOINT — I AM PUTTING FORWARD FIVE I AM PUTTING FORWARD FIVE NAMES. NAMES. MYSELF, COUNCILMEMBER KOZLOWSKI, MYSELF, COUNCILMEMBER KOZLOWSKI, TOM SCOTT, KELLY DUDLEY AND TOM SCOTT, KELLY DUDLEY AND KENDALL GILMORE. KENDALL GILMORE. AND I’M ASSUMING YOU WOULD AND I’M ASSUMING YOU WOULD HAVE STAFF SUPPORT FROM THE HAVE STAFF SUPPORT FROM THE DISTRICT AND THE CITY AS NEEDED DISTRICT AND THE CITY AS NEEDED BUT THEY WOULDN’T NECESSARILY BUT THEY WOULDN’T NECESSARILY SERVE ON THE COMMITTEE. SERVE ON THE COMMITTEE. CORRECT, YEAH. CORRECT, YEAH. SECOND. SECOND. OKAY. OKAY. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. I DON’T HAVE ANY REQUESTS — I DON’T HAVE ANY REQUESTS — DO YOU KNOW WHERE THESE THREE DO YOU KNOW WHERE THESE THREE MEMBERS — I DON’T KNOW ANYTHING MEMBERS — I DON’T KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT THEM. ABOUT THEM. SO I’M NOT — I COULD DEFINITELY SO I’M NOT — I COULD DEFINITELY APPROVE YOU AND MIKE, BUT — APPROVE YOU AND MIKE, BUT — TOM SCOTT DOES NOT HAVE TOM SCOTT DOES NOT HAVE CHILDREN BUT HE IS — CHILDREN BUT HE IS — — THIS IS A WIDE RANGE. — THIS IS A WIDE RANGE. KELLY AND KENDALL BOTH HAVE KELLY AND KENDALL BOTH HAVE CHILDREN IN FOLSOM CORDOVA CHILDREN IN FOLSOM CORDOVA SCHOOL DISTRICTS AND THEY ARE SCHOOL DISTRICTS AND THEY ARE INTERESTED IN THEIR CHILDREN INTERESTED IN THEIR CHILDREN CONTINUING IN FOLSOM CORDOVA CONTINUING IN FOLSOM CORDOVA SCHOOL DISTRICTS AND IF THAT SCHOOL DISTRICTS AND IF THAT MEANS THEY NEED TO BE ANNEXED MEANS THEY NEED TO BE ANNEXED THEY ARE IN SUPPORT OF THAT. THEY ARE IN SUPPORT OF THAT. THE ONE THAT DOESN’T HAVE ANY THE ONE THAT DOESN’T HAVE ANY KIDS, JUST A DIFFERENT KIDS, JUST A DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVE. PERSPECTIVE. YEAH, HE’S JUST A LONG-TIME YEAH, HE’S JUST A LONG-TIME FOLSOM RESIDENT, VERY FOLSOM RESIDENT, VERY POLITICALLY EXPERIENCED. POLITICALLY EXPERIENCED. OKAY. OKAY. AND HE HAPPENS TO LIVE AND HE HAPPENS TO LIVE RANDOMLY GEOGRAPHICALLY AT THE RANDOMLY GEOGRAPHICALLY AT THE ABSOLUTE CENTER OF THAT AREA. ABSOLUTE CENTER OF THAT AREA. SO DO THEY ALL THREE LIVE IN SO DO THEY ALL THREE LIVE IN THAT AREA? THAT AREA? THEY DO. THEY DO. YEAH. YEAH. IS THERE ANY POTENTIAL FOR IS THERE ANY POTENTIAL FOR CONFLICT OF INTEREST? CONFLICT OF INTEREST? NONE OF THEM WORK FOR THE NONE OF THEM WORK FOR THE SCHOOL DISTRICT. SCHOOL DISTRICT. EITHER SCHOOL DISTRICT. EITHER SCHOOL DISTRICT. I’M JUST ASKING THAT QUESTION I’M JUST ASKING THAT QUESTION BECAUSE USUALLY WHEN WE’RE BECAUSE USUALLY WHEN WE’RE APPOINTING SOMETHING — APPOINTING SOMETHING — THAT’S A GOOD ONE. THAT’S A GOOD ONE. — WE GET APPLICATIONS AND A — WE GET APPLICATIONS AND A LITTLE BIT OF A HISTORY ON THEM. LITTLE BIT OF A HISTORY ON THEM. AS WAS STATED BY THE MAYOR, I AS WAS STATED BY THE MAYOR, I THINK THE PURPOSE HERE IS TO THINK THE PURPOSE HERE IS TO EXPLORE WHETHER THERE IS A EXPLORE WHETHER THERE IS A MAJORITY OF THE RESIDENTS IN MAJORITY OF THE RESIDENTS IN THAT AREA THAT ACTUALLY WOULD THAT AREA THAT ACTUALLY WOULD LIKE US TO PURSUE A BOUNDARY LIKE US TO PURSUE A BOUNDARY CHANGE. CHANGE. THAT REMAINS TO BE SEEN. THAT REMAINS TO BE SEEN. AND IF THAT WERE COME TO PASS, AND IF THAT WERE COME TO PASS, WE WOULD HAVE TO BRING ALL OF WE WOULD HAVE TO BRING ALL OF THAT BACK HERE. THAT BACK HERE. THAT LEADS ME TO ONE MORE THAT LEADS ME TO ONE MORE QUESTION AND THAT IS WOULD THERE QUESTION AND THAT IS WOULD THERE BE A POLL OF THOSE — OF ALL OF BE A POLL OF THOSE — OF ALL OF THE RESIDENTS THERE WITH THE RESIDENTS THERE WITH STUDENTS IN THE DISTRICT? STUDENTS IN THE DISTRICT? OR OF THE DISTRICT AS A WHOLE? OR OF THE DISTRICT AS A WHOLE? WELL, FIRST THE IDEA WOULD BE WELL, FIRST THE IDEA WOULD BE JUST TO GAUGE FROM THOSE JUST TO GAUGE FROM THOSE RESIDENTS IN THAT AFFECTED RESIDENTS IN THAT AFFECTED NEIGHBORHOOD DO THEY HAVE AN NEIGHBORHOOD DO THEY HAVE AN INTEREST IN BEING ANNEXED INTO INTEREST IN BEING ANNEXED INTO THE FOLSOM CORDOVA SCHOOL THE FOLSOM CORDOVA SCHOOL DISTRICT. DISTRICT. IF YES, THEN WE CAN EXPLORE THE IF YES, THEN WE CAN EXPLORE THE PROCESS. PROCESS. IF NO, THEN WE’RE DONE. IF NO, THEN WE’RE DONE. BUT I MEAN THESE THREE BUT I MEAN THESE THREE RESIDENTS PROBABLY ALREADY ARE RESIDENTS PROBABLY ALREADY ARE LEANING TO THAT, I WONDER IF LEANING TO THAT, I WONDER IF THERE’S GOING TO BE A BROADER THERE’S GOING TO BE A BROADER OUTREACH. OUTREACH. YES, WE WOULD WANT TO POLL YES, WE WOULD WANT TO POLL EVERYONE IN THAT AFFECTED EVERYONE IN THAT AFFECTED NEIGHBORHOOD. NEIGHBORHOOD. NOT PLANNING TO JAM IT DOWN NOT PLANNING TO JAM IT DOWN EVERYBODY’S THROAT. EVERYBODY’S THROAT. JUST KIDDING. JUST KIDDING. THAT NEVER HAPPENS. THAT NEVER HAPPENS. JUST A REMINDER, THE CHARTER JUST A REMINDER, THE CHARTER SAYS THAT THE MAYOR CAN APPOINT SAYS THAT THE MAYOR CAN APPOINT AN AD HOC COMMITTEE WITH AN AD HOC COMMITTEE WITH CONCURRENCE OF THE COUNCIL WHICH CONCURRENCE OF THE COUNCIL WHICH IS WHY I’M PUTTING FORWARD FIVE IS WHY I’M PUTTING FORWARD FIVE NAMES AND YOU CAN SAY NAY OR NAMES AND YOU CAN SAY NAY OR YEA. YEA. OKAY. OKAY. MY MOTION IS TO APPROVE MY MOTION IS TO APPROVE RESOLUTION NUMBER 11526 WITH THE RESOLUTION NUMBER 11526 WITH THE CHANGE THAT COUNCILMEMBER CHANGE THAT COUNCILMEMBER KOZLOWSKI AND MYSELF GET RID OF KOZLOWSKI AND MYSELF GET RID OF SECTION 1 B AND CHANGE PARENTS SECTION 1 B AND CHANGE PARENTS TO RESIDENTS AND PUT THAT TOM TO RESIDENTS AND PUT THAT TOM SCOTT, KELLY DUDLEY AND KENDALL SCOTT, KELLY DUDLEY AND KENDALL GILMORE. GILMORE. AND I SECOND BECAUSE I’D HAVE AND I SECOND BECAUSE I’D HAVE DIFFICULTY FINDING SOMEONE IN MY DIFFICULTY FINDING SOMEONE IN MY DISTRICT TO SERVE. DISTRICT TO SERVE. WE HAVE A MOTION AND A WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. SECOND. PLEASE CALL THE ROLL. PLEASE CALL THE ROLL. COUNCILMEMBERS LEARY. COUNCILMEMBERS LEARY. YES. YES. ROHRBOUGH. ROHRBOUGH. YES,. YES,. KOZLOWSKI. KOZLOWSKI. YES. YES. AQUINO. AQUINO. YES. YES. NEXT ITEM. NEXT ITEM. WE’RE SKIPPING OVER 20 SO WE WE’RE SKIPPING OVER 20 SO WE GO TO ITEM NUMBER 21, RESOLUTION GO TO ITEM NUMBER 21, RESOLUTION 11518 AUTHORIZING THE CITY 11518 AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN MOU MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN MOU BETWEEN THE STY AND THE FOLSOM BETWEEN THE STY AND THE FOLSOM MIDDLE MANAGEMENT GROUP. MIDDLE MANAGEMENT GROUP. ARE YOU DOING ONE ARE YOU DOING ONE PRESENTATION OR FOUR PRESENTATION OR FOUR PRESENTATIONS, ALLISON? PRESENTATIONS, ALLISON? I’M DOING ONE PRESENTATION. I’M DOING ONE PRESENTATION. BEAUTIFUL. BEAUTIFUL. COMBINING THE FOUR. COMBINING THE FOUR. OKAY, SOUNDS GOOD. OKAY, SOUNDS GOOD. MAKE IT AS SUCCINCT AS MAKE IT AS SUCCINCT AS POSSIBLE TONIGHT. POSSIBLE TONIGHT. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. JUST FOR THE RECORD, THIS IS JUST FOR THE RECORD, THIS IS ITEMS 21, 22, 23, AND 24. ITEMS 21, 22, 23, AND 24. MAYOR, MEMBERS OF THE MAYOR, MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL, ALLISON GARCIA, HUMAN COUNCIL, ALLISON GARCIA, HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR. RESOURCES DIRECTOR. TONIGHT I’LL BE PROVIDING AN TONIGHT I’LL BE PROVIDING AN OVERVIEW OF THE LABOR OVERVIEW OF THE LABOR NEGOTIATIONS WE’VE COMPLETED NEGOTIATIONS WE’VE COMPLETED OVER THE LAST SEVERAL MONTHS. OVER THE LAST SEVERAL MONTHS. THIS WAS A VERY INVOLVED THIS WAS A VERY INVOLVED PROCESS, ONE THAT REQUIRED A PROCESS, ONE THAT REQUIRED A GREAT DEAL OF EFFORT AND GREAT DEAL OF EFFORT AND COLLABORATION WITH THE CITY AND COLLABORATION WITH THE CITY AND OUR EMPLOYEE BARGAINING GROUPS. OUR EMPLOYEE BARGAINING GROUPS. OUR FOCUS THROUGHOUT WAS TO OUR FOCUS THROUGHOUT WAS TO MAINTAIN FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY MAINTAIN FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY WHILE ALSO ENSURING THE CITY WHILE ALSO ENSURING THE CITY REMAINS COMPETITIVE IN THE AREAS REMAINS COMPETITIVE IN THE AREAS OF RECRUITMENT AND RETENTION. OF RECRUITMENT AND RETENTION. THE NEGOTIATION TEAM APPRECIATES THE NEGOTIATION TEAM APPRECIATES THE COUNCIL’S THOUGHTFUL DIALOG THE COUNCIL’S THOUGHTFUL DIALOG AND SUPPORT WHICH PLAYED A KEY AND SUPPORT WHICH PLAYED A KEY ROLE IN HELPING US REACH ROLE IN HELPING US REACH AGREEMENTS THAT RESPONSIBLY AGREEMENTS THAT RESPONSIBLY BALANCE THE CITY’S FINANCIAL BALANCE THE CITY’S FINANCIAL REALITIES WITH THE NEEDS OF OUR REALITIES WITH THE NEEDS OF OUR EMPLOYEES. EMPLOYEES. I’M PLEASED TO SHARE THAT WE I’M PLEASED TO SHARE THAT WE SUCCESSFULLY CONCLUDED SUCCESSFULLY CONCLUDED NEGOTIATIONS WITH CORE NEGOTIATIONS WITH CORE BARGAINING GROUPS WHOSE BARGAINING GROUPS WHOSE CONTRACTS ARE SET TO EXPIRE AT CONTRACTS ARE SET TO EXPIRE AT THE END OF 2025. THE END OF 2025. THESE GROUPS INCLUDE FOLSOM THESE GROUPS INCLUDE FOLSOM MID-MANAGEMENT, FOLSOM POLICE MID-MANAGEMENT, FOLSOM POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION, FOLSOM OFFICERS ASSOCIATION, FOLSOM POLICE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION POLICE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION AND THE FOLSOM FIRE DEPARTMENT AND THE FOLSOM FIRE DEPARTMENT MIDDLE MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES. MIDDLE MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES. EACH AGREEMENT IS GROUNDED IN EACH AGREEMENT IS GROUNDED IN OBJECTIVE DATA PARTICULARLY THE OBJECTIVE DATA PARTICULARLY THE MARKET SURVEYS CONDUCTED TO MARKET SURVEYS CONDUCTED TO UNDERSTAND WHERE COMPENSATION UNDERSTAND WHERE COMPENSATION STANDS RELATIVE TO SIMILAR STANDS RELATIVE TO SIMILAR AGENCIES. AGENCIES. TO WALK YOU THROUGH THE PROCESS, TO WALK YOU THROUGH THE PROCESS, WE BEGAN BY REVIEWING EXISTING WE BEGAN BY REVIEWING EXISTING CONTRACTS TO IDENTIFY AREAS THAT CONTRACTS TO IDENTIFY AREAS THAT REQUIRE UPDATING OR REQUIRE UPDATING OR CLARIFICATION. CLARIFICATION. THIS SERVED AS OUR BASE LINE FOR THIS SERVED AS OUR BASE LINE FOR THE DISCUSSIONS AHEAD. THE DISCUSSIONS AHEAD. NEXT WE COMPLETED COMPREHENSIVE NEXT WE COMPLETED COMPREHENSIVE MARKET SALARY STUDIES. MARKET SALARY STUDIES. THIS GAVE US CLEAR UNDERSTANDING THIS GAVE US CLEAR UNDERSTANDING OF HOW OUR TOTAL COMP PACKAGES OF HOW OUR TOTAL COMP PACKAGES COMPARE ACROSS THE REGION. COMPARE ACROSS THE REGION. THAT ANALYSIS BECAME A CRITICAL THAT ANALYSIS BECAME A CRITICAL FOUNDATION FOR DETERMINING FOUNDATION FOR DETERMINING WHETHER MARKET ADJUSTMENTS WERE WHETHER MARKET ADJUSTMENTS WERE WARRANTED AND TO WHAT DEGREE. WARRANTED AND TO WHAT DEGREE. ONCE WE HAD THAT INFORMATION, WE ONCE WE HAD THAT INFORMATION, WE BEGAN MEETING WITH THE UNIONS TO BEGAN MEETING WITH THE UNIONS TO EXCHANGE PROPOSALS. EXCHANGE PROPOSALS. THESE PROPOSALS WERE SHAPED BY THESE PROPOSALS WERE SHAPED BY BOTH THE DATA AND BROADER BOTH THE DATA AND BROADER PRIORITIES OF THE CITY AND ITS PRIORITIES OF THE CITY AND ITS RESIDENTS. RESIDENTS. THROUGHOUT THESE MEETINGS, BOTH THROUGHOUT THESE MEETINGS, BOTH SIDES OF THE TABLE CLARIFIED SIDES OF THE TABLE CLARIFIED PRIORITIES, LISTENED TO PRIORITIES, LISTENED TO CONCERNS, AND WORKED CONCERNS, AND WORKED COLLABORATIVELY THROUGH TO COLLABORATIVELY THROUGH TO SOLUTIONS. SOLUTIONS. AFTER EXPLORING OPTIONS WITH AFTER EXPLORING OPTIONS WITH EACH GROUP, WE WERE ULTIMATELY EACH GROUP, WE WERE ULTIMATELY ABLE TO REACH TENTATIVE ABLE TO REACH TENTATIVE AGREEMENTS THAT ADDRESS AGREEMENTS THAT ADDRESS ORGANIZATIONAL NEEDS AND ORGANIZATIONAL NEEDS AND EMPLOYEE PRIORITIES. EMPLOYEE PRIORITIES. FOR THE FOLSOM MIDDLE MANAGEMENT FOR THE FOLSOM MIDDLE MANAGEMENT GROUP, WE REACHED A THREE-YEAR GROUP, WE REACHED A THREE-YEAR DEAL COVERING JANUARY 1st, DEAL COVERING JANUARY 1st, 2026 THROUGH DECEMBER 31st, 2026 THROUGH DECEMBER 31st, 2028. 2028. THIS AGREEMENT INCLUDES A 3% THIS AGREEMENT INCLUDES A 3% COLA IN EACH YEAR OF THE COLA IN EACH YEAR OF THE CONTRACT. CONTRACT. IN ADDITION, POSITIONS IN ADDITION, POSITIONS IDENTIFIED AS BEING BELOW MARKET IDENTIFIED AS BEING BELOW MARKET IN THE SALARY SURVEY WILL IN THE SALARY SURVEY WILL RECEIVE A 5% MARKET ADJUSTMENT. RECEIVE A 5% MARKET ADJUSTMENT. WE ALSO INCLUDED AN ANNUAL BOOT WE ALSO INCLUDED AN ANNUAL BOOT ALLOWANCE OF A MAXIMUM OF $325 ALLOWANCE OF A MAXIMUM OF $325 PER ELIGIBLE EMPLOYEE. PER ELIGIBLE EMPLOYEE. ANOTHER CHANGE WAS AN INCREASE ANOTHER CHANGE WAS AN INCREASE TO THE HEALTH INSURANCE CASH IN TO THE HEALTH INSURANCE CASH IN LIEU PAYMENT WHICH WILL INCREASE LIEU PAYMENT WHICH WILL INCREASE FROM 250 TO $300 PER MONTH. FROM 250 TO $300 PER MONTH. BEYOND THE FINANCIAL COMPONENTS, BEYOND THE FINANCIAL COMPONENTS, WE WORKED WITH THE GROUP TO WE WORKED WITH THE GROUP TO FINALIZE LANGUAGE CHANGES FINALIZE LANGUAGE CHANGES HELPING CLARIFY PROCESSES AND HELPING CLARIFY PROCESSES AND IMPROVE CONSISTENCY. IMPROVE CONSISTENCY. WITH THE FOLSOM POLICE OFFICERS WITH THE FOLSOM POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION, WE AGAIN REACHED A ASSOCIATION, WE AGAIN REACHED A THREE-YEAR AGREEMENT COVERING THREE-YEAR AGREEMENT COVERING 2026 THROUGH 2028. 2026 THROUGH 2028. THIS CONTRACT INCLUDES A 3% COLA THIS CONTRACT INCLUDES A 3% COLA EACH YEAR AS WELL AS MARKET EACH YEAR AS WELL AS MARKET ADJUSTMENTS FOR POSITIONS DEEMED ADJUSTMENTS FOR POSITIONS DEEMED BELOW MARKET. BELOW MARKET. THIS RESULTS IN A 19.1% THIS RESULTS IN A 19.1% COMPOUNDED INCREASE OVER THREE COMPOUNDED INCREASE OVER THREE YEARS. YEARS. WE ALSO MADE ENHANCEMENTS TO WE ALSO MADE ENHANCEMENTS TO EDUCATIONAL INCENTIVE PAY FOR EDUCATIONAL INCENTIVE PAY FOR RECORDS, COMMUNICATION, DISPATCH RECORDS, COMMUNICATION, DISPATCH AND ANIMAL CONTROL EMPLOYEES. AND ANIMAL CONTROL EMPLOYEES. DETECTIVE PAY WAS ANOTHER AREA DETECTIVE PAY WAS ANOTHER AREA ADDRESSED. ADDRESSED. OFFICERS ASSIGNED TO THE OFFICERS ASSIGNED TO THE DETECTIVE DIVISION WILL NOW DETECTIVE DIVISION WILL NOW RECEIVE AN ADDITIONAL 5% RECEIVE AN ADDITIONAL 5% DIFFERENTIAL FOR THAT DIFFERENTIAL FOR THAT ASSIGNMENT. ASSIGNMENT. AS WITH THE OTHER BARGAINING AS WITH THE OTHER BARGAINING GROUPS, WE HAD NON-ECONOMIC AND GROUPS, WE HAD NON-ECONOMIC AND CLARIFYING LANGUAGE UPDATES. CLARIFYING LANGUAGE UPDATES. THE AGREEMENT WITH THE POLICE THE AGREEMENT WITH THE POLICE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION IS ALSO A MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION IS ALSO A THREE-YEAR CONTRACT SPANNING THE THREE-YEAR CONTRACT SPANNING THE SAME PERIOD JANUARY 1st, 2026 SAME PERIOD JANUARY 1st, 2026 THROUGH DECEMBER 31st, 2028. THROUGH DECEMBER 31st, 2028. THIS AGREEMENT MIRRORS SEVERAL THIS AGREEMENT MIRRORS SEVERAL OF THEMES IN THE PREVIOUS OF THEMES IN THE PREVIOUS CONTRACTS, A 3% COLA IN EACH CONTRACTS, A 3% COLA IN EACH YEAR, A TOTAL OF 5% MARKET YEAR, A TOTAL OF 5% MARKET ADJUSTMENTS SPLIT ACROSS YEARS ADJUSTMENTS SPLIT ACROSS YEARS ONE AND TWO AND A SET OF ONE AND TWO AND A SET OF NON-ECONOMIC LANGUAGE UPDATES. NON-ECONOMIC LANGUAGE UPDATES. FOR THE FIRE DEPARTMENT’S MIDDLE FOR THE FIRE DEPARTMENT’S MIDDLE MANAGEMENT GROUP, WE ALSO MANAGEMENT GROUP, WE ALSO REACHED A THREE-YEAR AGREEMENT REACHED A THREE-YEAR AGREEMENT FOR 2026 THROUGH 2028. FOR 2026 THROUGH 2028. THIS GROUP WILL RECEIVE A 2.5% THIS GROUP WILL RECEIVE A 2.5% COLA EACH YEAR OF THE CONTRACT. COLA EACH YEAR OF THE CONTRACT. THE COLA SLIGHTLY LOWER THAN THE COLA SLIGHTLY LOWER THAN SOME OF THE OTHER GROUPS DUE TO SOME OF THE OTHER GROUPS DUE TO FACTORS SPECIFIC TO THIS UNIT FACTORS SPECIFIC TO THIS UNIT AND ITS MARKETING POSITION. AND ITS MARKETING POSITION. ONE OF THE KEY FINANCIAL CHANGES ONE OF THE KEY FINANCIAL CHANGES IN THIS AGREEMENT IS AN INCREASE IN THIS AGREEMENT IS AN INCREASE TO THE CITY’S PREMIUM TO THE CITY’S PREMIUM CONTRIBUTION FOR DENTAL AND CONTRIBUTION FOR DENTAL AND VISION INSURANCE FROM THE VISION INSURANCE FROM THE CURRENT 80% TO 100%. CURRENT 80% TO 100%. THIS GROUP ALSO WORKED WITH US THIS GROUP ALSO WORKED WITH US TO FINALIZE A VARIETY OF TO FINALIZE A VARIETY OF NON-ECONOMIC AND CLARIFICATION NON-ECONOMIC AND CLARIFICATION LANGUAGE UPDATES THAT HELPED LANGUAGE UPDATES THAT HELPED SUPPORT CONSISTENT APPLICATION SUPPORT CONSISTENT APPLICATION OF THE AGREEMENT. OF THE AGREEMENT. WITH A COMPLETION OF THESE WITH A COMPLETION OF THESE NEGOTIATIONS, THE CITY NOW HAS NEGOTIATIONS, THE CITY NOW HAS ALL SIX BARGAINING GROUPS UNDER ALL SIX BARGAINING GROUPS UNDER MULTI-YEAR CONTRACTS UNTIL 2028. MULTI-YEAR CONTRACTS UNTIL 2028. HAVING ALL GROUPS UNDER CONTRACT HAVING ALL GROUPS UNDER CONTRACT PROVIDES IMPORTANT PROVIDES IMPORTANT ORGANIZATIONAL STABILITY, IT ORGANIZATIONAL STABILITY, IT ALSO STRENGTHENS OUR ABILITY TO ALSO STRENGTHENS OUR ABILITY TO PLAN FOR THE COMING YEARS BOTH PLAN FOR THE COMING YEARS BOTH FINANCIALLY AND OPERATIONALLY. FINANCIALLY AND OPERATIONALLY. WITH THAT, STAFF RECOMMENDS WITH THAT, STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVE OF RESOLUTIONS 11518, APPROVE OF RESOLUTIONS 11518, 11519, 11520, AND 11521 11519, 11520, AND 11521 EXECUTING THE MEMORANDA OF EXECUTING THE MEMORANDA OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF FOLSOM AND EACH BARGAINING OF FOLSOM AND EACH BARGAINING GROUP. GROUP. THIS CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION. THIS CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION. I’M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY I’M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. QUESTIONS. THANK YOU, ALLISON, AND THANK THANK YOU, ALLISON, AND THANK YOU TO YOU AND YOUR TEAM FOR ALL YOU TO YOU AND YOUR TEAM FOR ALL THE WORK. THE WORK. ANY QUESTIONS FOR ALLISON? ANY QUESTIONS FOR ALLISON? ANY QUESTIONS OVER HERE? ANY QUESTIONS OVER HERE? WE DO NEED FOUR SEPARATE WE DO NEED FOUR SEPARATE MOTIONS, PLEASE. MOTIONS, PLEASE. I’LL MOVE TO APPROVE I’LL MOVE TO APPROVE RESOLUTION NUMBER 11518. RESOLUTION NUMBER 11518. ONE AT A TIME. ONE AT A TIME. ONE AT A TIME, OKAY. ONE AT A TIME, OKAY. DO WE HAVE A SECOND? DO WE HAVE A SECOND? SECOND. SECOND. WE HAVE A MOTION AND SECOND. WE HAVE A MOTION AND SECOND. PLEASE CALL THE ROLL. PLEASE CALL THE ROLL. LEARY. LEARY. YES. YES. RAITHEL. RAITHEL. YES. YES. ROHRBOUGH. ROHRBOUGH. YES. YES. KOZLOWSKI. KOZLOWSKI. YES. YES. AND AQUINO. AND AQUINO. I’LL MOVE RESOLUTION 11519. I’LL MOVE RESOLUTION 11519. COUNCILMEMBER LEARY. COUNCILMEMBER LEARY. YES. YES. RAITHEL. RAITHEL. YES. YES. ERROR BEAU. ERROR BEAU. YES. YES. KOZLOWSKI. KOZLOWSKI. YES. YES. AQUINO. AQUINO. YES. YES. I’LL MOVE RESOLUTION NUMBER I’LL MOVE RESOLUTION NUMBER 11520. 11520. SECOND. SECOND. WE HAVE A MOTION AND SECOND, WE HAVE A MOTION AND SECOND, PLEASE CALL THE ROLL. PLEASE CALL THE ROLL. COUNCILMEMBER LEARY. COUNCILMEMBER LEARY. YES. YES. RAITHEL. RAITHEL. YES. YES. ROHRBOUGH. ROHRBOUGH. YES. YES. KOZLOWSKI. KOZLOWSKI. YES. YES. AQUINO. AQUINO. YES. YES. I’LL MOVE TO APPROVE I’LL MOVE TO APPROVE RESOLUTION 115 WHEN 1. RESOLUTION 115 WHEN 1. I’LL SECOND. I’LL SECOND. BEFORE WE END ALL THESE — BEFORE WE END ALL THESE — MEMBER RAITHEL MOVES. MEMBER RAITHEL MOVES. BEFORE WE END ON ALL OF THES- BEFORE WE END ON ALL OF THES- WE’VE SPENT A LOT OF HOURS WE’VE SPENT A LOT OF HOURS THERE. THERE. I WANT TO SAY THANK YOU FOR I WANT TO SAY THANK YOU FOR ALL THE WORK, WHAT A TREAT ALL THE WORK, WHAT A TREAT YOU’RE GOING TO HAVE ALMOST TWO YOU’RE GOING TO HAVE ALMOST TWO YEARS OFF BUT A LOT OF WORK WENT YEARS OFF BUT A LOT OF WORK WENT INTO THIS AND CITY TO OUR CITY INTO THIS AND CITY TO OUR CITY MANAGER AS WELL. MANAGER AS WELL. I THINK WE HAD A REALLY GREAT I THINK WE HAD A REALLY GREAT RESULT. RESULT. EXCELLENT WORK. EXCELLENT WORK. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. WE HAVE A MOTION AND A WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. SECOND. PLEASE CALL THE ROLL. PLEASE CALL THE ROLL. COUNCILMEMBERS LEARY. COUNCILMEMBERS LEARY. YES. YES. RAITHEL. RAITHEL. YES. YES. ROHRBOUGH. ROHRBOUGH. YES. YES. KOZLOWSKI. KOZLOWSKI. YES. YES. AQUINO. AQUINO. YES. YES. AND THANK YOU FOR A SUCCINCT AND THANK YOU FOR A SUCCINCT PRESENTATION. PRESENTATION. ALLISON WINS THE AWARD ALLISON WINS THE AWARD TONIGHT. TONIGHT. NEXT IS ITEM 25, RESOLUTION NEXT IS ITEM 25, RESOLUTION 1111527 TO APPROVE AND ADOPT A W 1111527 TO APPROVE AND ADOPT A W SALARY AND ESTABLISH NEW SALARY SALARY AND ESTABLISH NEW SALARY TABLES FOR THE CITY OF FOLSOM TABLES FOR THE CITY OF FOLSOM EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT TEAM. EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT TEAM. ALLISON GARCIA, HUMAN ALLISON GARCIA, HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR. RESOURCES DIRECTOR. TONIGHT’S PRESENTATION IS TONIGHT’S PRESENTATION IS PROMPTED BY CAL PERS PROMPTED BY CAL PERS REQUIREMENT. REQUIREMENT. WE ARE UPDATING THE CITY WE ARE UPDATING THE CITY SCHEDULE TO REFLECT SALARY SCHEDULE TO REFLECT SALARY RANGES PREVIOUSLY APPROVED BY RANGES PREVIOUSLY APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL THROUGH VARIOUS CITY COUNCIL THROUGH VARIOUS COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENTS COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENTS AS SHOWN IN ATTACHMENT 2 OF THE AS SHOWN IN ATTACHMENT 2 OF THE STAFF REPORT AND TO INTRODUCE A STAFF REPORT AND TO INTRODUCE A NEW STEP-BASED STRUCTURE FOR THE NEW STEP-BASED STRUCTURE FOR THE EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT TEAM AND EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT TEAM AND CONTRACT EMPLOYEES. CONTRACT EMPLOYEES. THE CAL PERS REQUIREMENTS ARE THE CAL PERS REQUIREMENTS ARE OUTLINED IN THE STAFF REPORT AND OUTLINED IN THE STAFF REPORT AND TWO SLIDES. TWO SLIDES. IF COUNCIL APPROVES THIS PAY IF COUNCIL APPROVES THIS PAY SCHEDULE TONIGHT, IT WILL BE SCHEDULE TONIGHT, IT WILL BE POSTED ON THE CITY OF FOLSOM POSTED ON THE CITY OF FOLSOM HUMAN RESOURCES WEBSITE. HUMAN RESOURCES WEBSITE. OVER THE PAST SEVERAL MONTHS, WE OVER THE PAST SEVERAL MONTHS, WE NEGOTIATED WITH OUR SIX NEGOTIATED WITH OUR SIX BARGAINING GROUPS ALL OF WHOM BARGAINING GROUPS ALL OF WHOM HAVE STEP B SALARY SCHEDULES. HAVE STEP B SALARY SCHEDULES. IN CONTRAST, THE EXECUTIVE IN CONTRAST, THE EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT TEAM AND CONTRACT MANAGEMENT TEAM AND CONTRACT EMPLOYEES HAVE ONLY MINIMUM AND EMPLOYEES HAVE ONLY MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM RANGES WITHOUT CLEARLY MAXIMUM RANGES WITHOUT CLEARLY DEFINED STEPS. DEFINED STEPS. TO PROMOTE TRANSPARENCY AND TO PROMOTE TRANSPARENCY AND ALIGN WITH OTHER CLASSIFICATIONS ALIGN WITH OTHER CLASSIFICATIONS THROUGH THE CITY, WE ARE THROUGH THE CITY, WE ARE INTRODUCES STEP-BASED SALARY INTRODUCES STEP-BASED SALARY TABLES FOR THESE POSITIONS TABLES FOR THESE POSITIONS BRINGING THEM INTO ALIGNMENT BRINGING THEM INTO ALIGNMENT WITH THE CITY-WIDE COMPENSATION WITH THE CITY-WIDE COMPENSATION FRAMEWORK. FRAMEWORK. THE COMPENSATION PROJECT FOR THE THE COMPENSATION PROJECT FOR THE EXECUTIVE MAJORITY GOVERNMENT EXECUTIVE MAJORITY GOVERNMENT TEAM FOLLOWED THE SAME APPROACH TEAM FOLLOWED THE SAME APPROACH USED FOR ALL BARGAINING GROUPS. USED FOR ALL BARGAINING GROUPS. WE ENGAGED BRYCE CONSULTING TO WE ENGAGED BRYCE CONSULTING TO CONDUCT A SURVEY, COLLECTING CONDUCT A SURVEY, COLLECTING MARKET DATA PR COMPARABLE MARKET DATA PR COMPARABLE AGENCIES AND SIMILARLY SPATED AGENCIES AND SIMILARLY SPATED POSITIONS. POSITIONS. USING THIS DATA, WE EVALUATE USING THIS DATA, WE EVALUATE EACH POSITION FOR EACH POSITION FOR COMPETITIVENESS, APPLIED MARKET COMPETITIVENESS, APPLIED MARKET ADJUSTMENTS. ADJUSTMENTS. AND INCORPORATED COST OF LIVING AND INCORPORATED COST OF LIVING ADJUSTMENTS LARGELY APPLIED ADJUSTMENTS LARGELY APPLIED CITY-WIDE. CITY-WIDE. FINALLY WE DEVELOPED STEP-BASED FINALLY WE DEVELOPED STEP-BASED SALARY RANGES FOR ALL EMT AND SALARY RANGES FOR ALL EMT AND SALARY POSITIONS IN LINE FOR SALARY POSITIONS IN LINE FOR BARGAINING GROUPS TO ENSURE BARGAINING GROUPS TO ENSURE CONSISTENCY AND TRANSPARENCY CONSISTENCY AND TRANSPARENCY ACROSS THE ORGANIZATION. ACROSS THE ORGANIZATION. AS PART OF THE PROPOSED TABLES, AS PART OF THE PROPOSED TABLES, A 3% COST OF LIVING ADJUSTMENT A 3% COST OF LIVING ADJUSTMENT IS INCLUDED IN 2025, 2026, AND IS INCLUDED IN 2025, 2026, AND 2027 CONSISTENT WITH MOST OF OUR 2027 CONSISTENT WITH MOST OF OUR MULTI-YEAR UNION CONTRACTS. MULTI-YEAR UNION CONTRACTS. MARKET ADJUSTMENTS ARE MARKET ADJUSTMENTS ARE RECOMMENDED FOR POSITIONS RECOMMENDED FOR POSITIONS IDENTIFIED IN THE SURVEY AS IDENTIFIED IN THE SURVEY AS BELOW MARKET ENSURING THAT BELOW MARKET ENSURING THAT SALARIES REMAIN COMPETITIVE AND SALARIES REMAIN COMPETITIVE AND SUPPORT INTERNAL EQUITY. SUPPORT INTERNAL EQUITY. WHILE THIS STEP-BASED STRUCTURE WHILE THIS STEP-BASED STRUCTURE MAY FEEL NEW OR UNUSUAL FOR EMT MAY FEEL NEW OR UNUSUAL FOR EMT AND CONTRACT EMPLOYEES, IT AND CONTRACT EMPLOYEES, IT PROVIDES A CLEAR, TRANSPARENT PROVIDES A CLEAR, TRANSPARENT AND CONSISTENT FRAMEWORK FOR AND CONSISTENT FRAMEWORK FOR SETTING SALARIES JUST AS WE DO SETTING SALARIES JUST AS WE DO WITH BARGAINING GROUPS. WITH BARGAINING GROUPS. WITH THAT, STAFF RECOMMENDS WITH THAT, STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION 11527, A APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION 11527, A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE AND ADOPT RESOLUTION TO APPROVE AND ADOPT A CITY-WIDE PAY SCHEDULE AS A CITY-WIDE PAY SCHEDULE AS REQUIRED BY CALPERS AND REQUIRED BY CALPERS AND ESTABLISH NEW SALARY TABLES FOR ESTABLISH NEW SALARY TABLES FOR THE CITY OF FOLSOM EXECUTIVE THE CITY OF FOLSOM EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT TEAM. MANAGEMENT TEAM. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ANY QUESTIONS FOR ALLISON? ANY QUESTIONS FOR ALLISON? ANY OVER HERE? ANY OVER HERE? HERE’S YOUR BIG MOMENT. HERE’S YOUR BIG MOMENT. THIS IS JUSTIN’S TURN THEN. THIS IS JUSTIN’S TURN THEN. I’LL MOVE RESOLUTION NUMBER I’LL MOVE RESOLUTION NUMBER 11527. 11527. SECOND. SECOND. WE HAVE A MOTION AND SECOND. WE HAVE A MOTION AND SECOND. I WAS WORRIED FOR A SECOND. I WAS WORRIED FOR A SECOND. I DO WANT TO MAKE A COMMENT. I DO WANT TO MAKE A COMMENT. JUST FOR THE PUBLIC BECAUSE WE JUST FOR THE PUBLIC BECAUSE WE DIDN’T HAVE A DISCUSSION HERE DIDN’T HAVE A DISCUSSION HERE BUT WE DID HAVE A GOOD BUT WE DID HAVE A GOOD DISCUSSION AND HAD LOTS OF DISCUSSION AND HAD LOTS OF QUESTIONS SO I THINK THE WHOLE QUESTIONS SO I THINK THE WHOLE COUNCIL REALLY THOUGHT THROUGH COUNCIL REALLY THOUGHT THROUGH THIS AND THEN I THANK YOU AGAIN THIS AND THEN I THANK YOU AGAIN TO STAFF FOR PRESENTING THE TO STAFF FOR PRESENTING THE REASONS WHY AND HOW THIS WILL REASONS WHY AND HOW THIS WILL HELP US MOVE FORWARD. HELP US MOVE FORWARD. I ALSO APPRECIATE THESE BEING I ALSO APPRECIATE THESE BEING NOT ON OUR CONSENT CALENDAR SO NOT ON OUR CONSENT CALENDAR SO THANK YOU FOR GIVING A THANK YOU FOR GIVING A PRESENTATION. PRESENTATION. SO WE AIR THESE TO THE PUBLIC SO WE AIR THESE TO THE PUBLIC AND MAKE SURE WE’RE DOING OUR AND MAKE SURE WE’RE DOING OUR DUE DILIGENCE. DUE DILIGENCE. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. PLEASE CALL THE ROLL. PLEASE CALL THE ROLL. COUNCILMEMBERS LEARY. COUNCILMEMBERS LEARY. YES. YES. RAITHEL. RAITHEL. YES. YES. ROHRBOUGH. ROHRBOUGH. YES. YES. KOZLOWSKI. KOZLOWSKI. YES. YES. AQUINO. AQUINO. YES. YES. OKAY, THAT TAKES US TO OUR OKAY, THAT TAKES US TO OUR LAST ITEM THIS EVENING, THIS IS LAST ITEM THIS EVENING, THIS IS SELECTION OF THE MAYOR AND SELECTION OF THE MAYOR AND VICE-MAYOR FOR 2026. VICE-MAYOR FOR 2026. ALL RIGHT. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU FOR THE HONOR AND THANK YOU FOR THE HONOR AND PRIVILEGE OF ALLOWING ME TO PRIVILEGE OF ALLOWING ME TO SERVE AS MAYOR FOR THIS PAST SERVE AS MAYOR FOR THIS PAST YEAR. YEAR. FOR 2026, I WOULD LIKE TO FOR 2026, I WOULD LIKE TO NOMINATE VICE-MAYOR JUSTIN NOMINATE VICE-MAYOR JUSTIN RAITHEL TO SERVE AS MAYOR. RAITHEL TO SERVE AS MAYOR. SECOND. SECOND. WE HAVE A MOTION AND A WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. SECOND. PLEASE CALL THE ROLL. PLEASE CALL THE ROLL. COUNCILMEMBERS LEARY. COUNCILMEMBERS LEARY. YES. YES. RAITHEL. RAITHEL. YES. YES. ROHRBOUGH. ROHRBOUGH. YES. YES. KOZLOWSKI. KOZLOWSKI. YES. YES. AQUINO. AQUINO. YES, AND I WOULD LIKE TO YES, AND I WOULD LIKE TO NOMINATE COUNCILMEMBER ANNA NOMINATE COUNCILMEMBER ANNA ROHRBOUGH TO SERVE AS ROHRBOUGH TO SERVE AS VICE-MAYOR. VICE-MAYOR. SECOND. SECOND. WE HAVE A MOTION AND A WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. SECOND. PLEASE CALL THE ROLL. PLEASE CALL THE ROLL. COUNCILMEMBERS LEARY. COUNCILMEMBERS LEARY. YES. YES. RAITHEL. RAITHEL. YES. YES. ROHRBOUGH. ROHRBOUGH. YES. YES. KOZLOWSKI. KOZLOWSKI. YES. YES. AQUINO. AQUINO. YES. YES. WE HAVE TRADITIONALLY ALLOWED WE HAVE TRADITIONALLY ALLOWED THE FORMER MAYOR TO CONTINUE THE THE FORMER MAYOR TO CONTINUE THE MEETING SO WITH YOUR PERMISSION, MEETING SO WITH YOUR PERMISSION, I WILL SEE THIS THROUGH TO THE I WILL SEE THIS THROUGH TO THE END. END. ABSOLUTELY. ABSOLUTELY. OKAY. OKAY. THAT TAKES US TO CITY MANAGER THAT TAKES US TO CITY MANAGER REPORT. REPORT. OKAY. OKAY. WELL, THANK YOU, MAYOR, MEMBERS WELL, THANK YOU, MAYOR, MEMBERS OF COUNCIL. OF COUNCIL. FIRST OFF I WOULD LIKE TO FIRST OFF I WOULD LIKE TO WELCOME OUR NEW POLICE WELCOME OUR NEW POLICE CHIEF CHIEF ADAM GREENE. CHIEF CHIEF ADAM GREENE. WELCOME TO THE CITY OF FOLSOM. WELCOME TO THE CITY OF FOLSOM. WE’RE REALLY EXCITED TO HAVE HIM WE’RE REALLY EXCITED TO HAVE HIM HERE. HERE. HE COMES TO THE CITY WITH AN HE COMES TO THE CITY WITH AN ABUNDANCE OF EXPERIENCE IN THE ABUNDANCE OF EXPERIENCE IN THE LAW ENFORCEMENT FIELD SERVING LAW ENFORCEMENT FIELD SERVING PREVIOUSLY FOR 24 YEARS WITH THE PREVIOUSLY FOR 24 YEARS WITH THE SACRAMENTO POLICE DEPARTMENT. SACRAMENTO POLICE DEPARTMENT. MOST RECENTLY AS THEIR DEPUTY MOST RECENTLY AS THEIR DEPUTY CHIEF. CHIEF. SO WE’RE JUST REALLY EXCITED TO SO WE’RE JUST REALLY EXCITED TO HAVE SOMEONE OF CHIEF GREENE’S HAVE SOMEONE OF CHIEF GREENE’S CALIBER JOINING OUR TEAM AND, CALIBER JOINING OUR TEAM AND, YOU KNOW, COMBINED WITH HIS YOU KNOW, COMBINED WITH HIS LEADERSHIP AND THE WONDERFUL MEN LEADERSHIP AND THE WONDERFUL MEN AND WOMEN OF THE FOLSOM POLICE AND WOMEN OF THE FOLSOM POLICE DEPARTMENT, I THINK WE’RE JUST DEPARTMENT, I THINK WE’RE JUST IN REALLY GOOD HANDS. IN REALLY GOOD HANDS. AS A REMINDER, WE HAVE NIGHT AS A REMINDER, WE HAVE NIGHT WORK SCHEDULED AT OAK AVENUE WORK SCHEDULED AT OAK AVENUE PARKWAY AND EAST BIDWELL. PARKWAY AND EAST BIDWELL. THE CITY OF FOLSOM UTILITIES THE CITY OF FOLSOM UTILITIES DEPARTMENT WILL CONDUCT NIGHT DEPARTMENT WILL CONDUCT NIGHT WORK ON THE SEWER INFRASTRUCTURE WORK ON THE SEWER INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT. PROJECT. WORK IS UNDER WAY AND CONTINUING WORK IS UNDER WAY AND CONTINUING THROUGH EARLY FRIDAY MORNING THROUGH EARLY FRIDAY MORNING DECEMBER 12th. DECEMBER 12th. WORK HOURS ARE FROM 8 P.M. TO WORK HOURS ARE FROM 8 P.M. TO 6 A.M. 6 A.M. CREWS WILL INSTALL A PIPELINER CREWS WILL INSTALL A PIPELINER ON EXISTING SEWER MAINS LOCATED ON EXISTING SEWER MAINS LOCATED ON OAK AVENUE PARKWAY NEAR EAST ON OAK AVENUE PARKWAY NEAR EAST BIDWELL STREET AND SEWER PHASE BIDWELL STREET AND SEWER PHASE ONE PROJECT IS A CITY OF FOLSOM ONE PROJECT IS A CITY OF FOLSOM WASTE WATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT WASTE WATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FOCUSING ON PROJECT FOCUSING ON REHABILITATING AND IMPROVING REHABILITATING AND IMPROVING EXISTING SEWER LINES WHERE AGING EXISTING SEWER LINES WHERE AGING INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDS UPGRADES TO INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDS UPGRADES TO MAINTAIN RELIABLE SERVICE. MAINTAIN RELIABLE SERVICE. WE HAVE A DESIGN REVEAL FOR THE WE HAVE A DESIGN REVEAL FOR THE BEN VEIN TOW FAMILY PARK, WE BEN VEIN TOW FAMILY PARK, WE ENCOURAGE FOLKS INTERESTED IN ENCOURAGE FOLKS INTERESTED IN THAT UNVEILING TO COME TO THE THAT UNVEILING TO COME TO THE DESIGN REVEAL THAT WOULD TAKE DESIGN REVEAL THAT WOULD TAKE PLACE ON WEDNESDAY, PLACE ON WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 10th AT 5:30 P.M. AND DECEMBER 10th AT 5:30 P.M. AND IT WILL BE HELD IN THE LIBRARY IT WILL BE HELD IN THE LIBRARY AT VISTA DELAG A HIGH SCHOOL. AT VISTA DELAG A HIGH SCHOOL. AND WANT TO CONGRATULATE OUR AND WANT TO CONGRATULATE OUR FINANCE TEAM, OUR FINANCE FINANCE TEAM, OUR FINANCE DIRECTOR STACY TIMANI, EARNING A DIRECTOR STACY TIMANI, EARNING A CERTIFICATE OF ACHIEVEMENT IN CERTIFICATE OF ACHIEVEMENT IN EXCELLENCE FOR FISCAL YEAR EXCELLENCE FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024 COMPREHENSIVE 2023-2024 COMPREHENSIVE FINANCIAL REPORT. FINANCIAL REPORT. THE CERTIFICATE IS THE HIGHEST THE CERTIFICATE IS THE HIGHEST HONOR IN GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTING HONOR IN GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL REPORTING. AND FINANCIAL REPORTING. I APPRECIATE THEIR EFFORTS THAT I APPRECIATE THEIR EFFORTS THAT WENT INTO REACHING THAT LEVEL. WENT INTO REACHING THAT LEVEL. ALSO, THE FOLSOM HOLIDAY LIGHTS ALSO, THE FOLSOM HOLIDAY LIGHTS CONTEST. CONTEST. THERE’S STILL TIME TO ENTER YOUR THERE’S STILL TIME TO ENTER YOUR HOME, NEIGHBORHOOD OR BUSINESS HOME, NEIGHBORHOOD OR BUSINESS IN THE ANNUAL FOLSOM HOLIDAY IN THE ANNUAL FOLSOM HOLIDAY LIGHTS CONTEST. LIGHTS CONTEST. YOU NEED TO REGISTER BY DECEMBEE YOU NEED TO REGISTER BY DECEMBEE WWW.FOLSOM.CA.US/HOLIDAYLIGHTSCO WWW.FOLSOM.CA.US/HOLIDAYLIGHTSCO NTEST. NTEST. AND JUST AS A WAY OF AND JUST AS A WAY OF INFORMATION, OUR FIRE DEPARTMENT INFORMATION, OUR FIRE DEPARTMENT WILL BE CONDUCTING TRAINING WILL BE CONDUCTING TRAINING HOSTING A REGIONAL RESCUE HOSTING A REGIONAL RESCUE TRAINING DRILL ON THE HISTORIC TRAINING DRILL ON THE HISTORIC TRESS BRIDGE THIS WEEK. TRESS BRIDGE THIS WEEK. IF YOU SEE WEIRD THINGS HANGING IF YOU SEE WEIRD THINGS HANGING FROM THE BRIDGE, IT’S TRAINING. FROM THE BRIDGE, IT’S TRAINING. SO THAT’S — PLEASE DON’T CALL SO THAT’S — PLEASE DON’T CALL IT IN. IT IN. JUST NAIL PATHWAY WILL BE OPEN JUST NAIL PATHWAY WILL BE OPEN FOR BICYCLISTS THAT MAY NEED TO FOR BICYCLISTS THAT MAY NEED TO WALK THEIR BIKES THROUGH THE WALK THEIR BIKES THROUGH THE ACTIVITY AREA. ACTIVITY AREA. ON ANOTHER NOTE, THE UTILITY ON ANOTHER NOTE, THE UTILITY COMMISSION WILL BE CONTINUING COMMISSION WILL BE CONTINUING PUBLIC DISCUSSIONS ABOUT WATER PUBLIC DISCUSSIONS ABOUT WATER AND SEWER RATES AT THE TUESDAY, AND SEWER RATES AT THE TUESDAY, DECEMBER 16th UTILITY DECEMBER 16th UTILITY COMMISSION MEETING. COMMISSION MEETING. THE MEETING BEGINS AT 6:30 P.M. THE MEETING BEGINS AT 6:30 P.M. IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS AT IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS AT CITY HALL AT 15 NATOMAS STREET CITY HALL AT 15 NATOMAS STREET AT THIS LOCATION. AT THIS LOCATION. WATER AND SEWER RATE STUDY WILL WATER AND SEWER RATE STUDY WILL PREPARE FIVE AND TEN-YEAR PREPARE FIVE AND TEN-YEAR FINANCIAL MODELS TO EVALUATE FINANCIAL MODELS TO EVALUATE OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE NEEDS, CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS AND NEEDS, CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS AND REVENUE REQUIREMENTS. REVENUE REQUIREMENTS. AND THAT CONCLUDES MY REPORT. AND THAT CONCLUDES MY REPORT. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. COUNCILMEMBER KOZLOWSKI. COUNCILMEMBER KOZLOWSKI. YEAH, JUST A COUPLE OF QUICK YEAH, JUST A COUPLE OF QUICK THINGS. THINGS. CONGRATULATIONS TO THE FOLSOM CONGRATULATIONS TO THE FOLSOM HISTORIC DISTRICT ASSOCIATION HISTORIC DISTRICT ASSOCIATION FOR PUTTING ON AN AMAZING PARTY FOR PUTTING ON AN AMAZING PARTY TWO DAYS IN A ROW, ONE FOR THE TWO DAYS IN A ROW, ONE FOR THE CHRISTMAS TREE LIGHTING WHICH CHRISTMAS TREE LIGHTING WHICH WAS SPECTACULAR AS ALWAYS AND WAS SPECTACULAR AS ALWAYS AND THEN THE FOLLOWING SUNDAY FOR AN THEN THE FOLLOWING SUNDAY FOR AN ARTS AND CRAFTS SHOW THAT WAS ARTS AND CRAFTS SHOW THAT WAS REALLY VERY ENTERTAINING AND REALLY VERY ENTERTAINING AND FUN. FUN. I WANT TO THANK THE FOLSOM I WANT TO THANK THE FOLSOM POLICE DEPARTMENT FOR GETTING POLICE DEPARTMENT FOR GETTING THE MARATHON OFF SAFELY. THE MARATHON OFF SAFELY. THAT’S ONE OF THE NUMBER ONE THAT’S ONE OF THE NUMBER ONE TOURIST ATTRACTIONS THAT WE HAVE TOURIST ATTRACTIONS THAT WE HAVE HERE IN FOLSOM EVERY YEAR, 7,000 HERE IN FOLSOM EVERY YEAR, 7,000 RUNNERS AND THEIR FAMILIES COME RUNNERS AND THEIR FAMILIES COME TO TOWN TO RUN FROM HERE TO THE TO TOWN TO RUN FROM HERE TO THE STATE CAPITAL AND IT’S A GOOD STATE CAPITAL AND IT’S A GOOD OPPORTUNITY FOR US TO PUT OUR OPPORTUNITY FOR US TO PUT OUR BEST FOOT FORWARD AND THE POLICE BEST FOOT FORWARD AND THE POLICE DEPARTMENT IS THE ONE THAT DOES DEPARTMENT IS THE ONE THAT DOES IT FOR US. IT FOR US. SO THANK YOU. SO THANK YOU. WELCOME, CHIEF GREENE. WELCOME, CHIEF GREENE. CONGRATULATIONS TO JUSTIN AND CONGRATULATIONS TO JUSTIN AND ANNA, YOU GUYS ARE GOING TO DO A ANNA, YOU GUYS ARE GOING TO DO A GREAT JOB AND LAST QUICK THING, GREAT JOB AND LAST QUICK THING, THE VISTA DID HE LIVE AGO OWE THE VISTA DID HE LIVE AGO OWE AND FOLSOM HIGH SCHOOL AND FOLSOM HIGH SCHOOL CROSS-COUNTRY TEAMS QUALIFIED CROSS-COUNTRY TEAMS QUALIFIED FOR THE STATE CHAMPIONSHIP FOR THE STATE CHAMPIONSHIP CROSS-COUNTRY MEET THIS YEAR. CROSS-COUNTRY MEET THIS YEAR. AND THE GIRLS AND THE BOYS FROM AND THE GIRLS AND THE BOYS FROM VISTA AND THE BOYS FROM FOLSOM VISTA AND THE BOYS FROM FOLSOM PERFORMED EXCELLENTLY ON THE PERFORMED EXCELLENTLY ON THE SATURDAY RIGHT AFTER SATURDAY RIGHT AFTER THANKSGIVING. THANKSGIVING. AND WITH YOUNG TEAMS, WHICH WILL AND WITH YOUNG TEAMS, WHICH WILL BE RIGHT BACK THERE NEXT YEAR, BE RIGHT BACK THERE NEXT YEAR, SO THAT’S ALL. SO THAT’S ALL. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. MAYOR-ELECT RAITHEL. MAYOR-ELECT RAITHEL. WELL, I HAVE SOME GOOD NEWS. WELL, I HAVE SOME GOOD NEWS. I DID GET APPOINTED BY THE SAC I DID GET APPOINTED BY THE SAC VALLEY DIVISION FOR CAL CITIES VALLEY DIVISION FOR CAL CITIES TO THE REVENUE AND TAXATION TO THE REVENUE AND TAXATION POLICY COMMITTEE SO I’LL BE POLICY COMMITTEE SO I’LL BE SERVING THERE FOR 2026. SERVING THERE FOR 2026. REALLY FOCUSED ON TRYING TO GET REALLY FOCUSED ON TRYING TO GET OUR FAIR SHARE OF SALES TAX OUR FAIR SHARE OF SALES TAX REVENUES AND ADVOCATING FOR REVENUES AND ADVOCATING FOR SMALLER CITIES LIKE FOLSOM. SMALLER CITIES LIKE FOLSOM. I ALSO WANTED TO TAKE A MOMENT I ALSO WANTED TO TAKE A MOMENT AND THANK MAYOR AQUINO FOR HER AND THANK MAYOR AQUINO FOR HER OUTSTANDING LEADERSHIP AND OUTSTANDING LEADERSHIP AND SERVICE TO OUR COMMUNITY OVER SERVICE TO OUR COMMUNITY OVER THE LAST YEAR. THE LAST YEAR. WE’VE GOT A SMALL TOKEN OF WE’VE GOT A SMALL TOKEN OF APPRECIATION THAT YOUR COUNCIL APPRECIATION THAT YOUR COUNCIL COLLEAGUES AND CITY MANAGER GOT COLLEAGUES AND CITY MANAGER GOT YOU. YOU. IT’S MAYBE TO YOUR FAVORITE IT’S MAYBE TO YOUR FAVORITE RESTAURANT DOWN ON SUTTER STREET RESTAURANT DOWN ON SUTTER STREET RIGHT NOW. RIGHT NOW. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. WE HOPE YOU ENJOY IT. WE HOPE YOU ENJOY IT. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. YOU DEFINITELY DESERVE IT. YOU DEFINITELY DESERVE IT. SARAH REPRESENTED OUR CITY WITH SARAH REPRESENTED OUR CITY WITH GRACE, WARMTH AND ELOQUENCE. GRACE, WARMTH AND ELOQUENCE. SHE’S ALWAYS SPEAKING FROM THE SHE’S ALWAYS SPEAKING FROM THE HEART AND SHARING PERSONAL HEART AND SHARING PERSONAL STORIES THAT REMIND US WHO WE STORIES THAT REMIND US WHO WE ARE AS A COMMUNITY. ARE AS A COMMUNITY. SHE’S BEEN APPROACHABLE AND SHE’S BEEN APPROACHABLE AND ACCESSIBLE HOLDING OPEN OFFICE ACCESSIBLE HOLDING OPEN OFFICE HOURS AND WELCOMING HOURS AND WELCOMING CONVERSATIONS WITH ANYONE WHO CONVERSATIONS WITH ANYONE WHO WANTED TO SHARE AN IDEA OR WANTED TO SHARE AN IDEA OR CONCERN. CONCERN. EVEN WHEN THEY WANTED TO SHARE EVEN WHEN THEY WANTED TO SHARE THOSE CONCERNS ON FOLSOM CHAT. THOSE CONCERNS ON FOLSOM CHAT. SARAH BUILDS RELATIONSHIPS AND SARAH BUILDS RELATIONSHIPS AND WORKS EFFECTIVELY ACROSS THE WORKS EFFECTIVELY ACROSS THE SACRAMENTO REGION PARTNERING AND SACRAMENTO REGION PARTNERING AND ADVOCATING TO IMPROVE REGIONAL, ADVOCATING TO IMPROVE REGIONAL, STATE AND EVEN FEDERAL STATE AND EVEN FEDERAL GOVERNANCE AND HERE AT HOME, GOVERNANCE AND HERE AT HOME, SHE’S FOSTERED GENUINE SHE’S FOSTERED GENUINE COLLEGIALITY AMONGST COUNCIL COLLEGIALITY AMONGST COUNCIL COLLEAGUES. COLLEAGUES. DURING A YEAR OF TRANSITION FOR DURING A YEAR OF TRANSITION FOR OUR CITY’S LEADERSHIP TEAM, OUR CITY’S LEADERSHIP TEAM, SARAH SERVED AS FOLSOM’S CHIEF SARAH SERVED AS FOLSOM’S CHIEF MORALE OFFICER REMINDING MORALE OFFICER REMINDING EVERYONE WHY WE LOVE SERVING EVERYONE WHY WE LOVE SERVING THIS COMMUNITY. THIS COMMUNITY. SO SARAH, THANK YOU FOR LEADING SO SARAH, THANK YOU FOR LEADING WITH HEART, HUMOR AND HUMANITY. WITH HEART, HUMOR AND HUMANITY. IT’S BEEN AN HONOR TO SERVE IT’S BEEN AN HONOR TO SERVE ALONGSIDE YOU. ALONGSIDE YOU. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. AND THANK YOU TO MY AND THANK YOU TO MY COLLEAGUES FOR TRUSTING ME FOR COLLEAGUES FOR TRUSTING ME FOR NEXT YEAR AND THANK YOU FOR NEXT YEAR AND THANK YOU FOR SERVING, ANNA, NEXT YEAR. SERVING, ANNA, NEXT YEAR. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. VICE-MAYOR ROHRBOUGH. VICE-MAYOR ROHRBOUGH. THANK YOU, THANK YOU FOR YOUR THANK YOU, THANK YOU FOR YOUR SERVICE AND YOUR PROFESSIONALISM SERVICE AND YOUR PROFESSIONALISM THIS YEAR, SARAH, REALLY THIS YEAR, SARAH, REALLY APPRECIATE IT. APPRECIATE IT. LOOK FORWARD TO SERVING WITH LOOK FORWARD TO SERVING WITH YOU, JUSTIN. YOU, JUSTIN. YOU’VE DONE A FINE JOB AS YOU’VE DONE A FINE JOB AS VICE-MAYOR AND THANK YOU FOR VICE-MAYOR AND THANK YOU FOR EVERYONE ELSE’S VOTE AND TRUST EVERYONE ELSE’S VOTE AND TRUST AS WELL. AS WELL. AND I JUST WANT TO SAY HAPPY AND I JUST WANT TO SAY HAPPY HOLIDAYS TO EVERYONE. HOLIDAYS TO EVERYONE. WE WON’T SEE YOU UNTIL THE NEW WE WON’T SEE YOU UNTIL THE NEW YEAR, WELL INTO THE NEW YEAR, YEAR, WELL INTO THE NEW YEAR, MIGHT BE HAPPY ABOUT THAT. MIGHT BE HAPPY ABOUT THAT. AND MERRY CHRISTMAS AND HAPPY AND MERRY CHRISTMAS AND HAPPY HOLIDAYS. HOLIDAYS. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. COUNCILMEMBER LEARY. COUNCILMEMBER LEARY. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. AND I WANT TO ALSO WELCOME CHIEF AND I WANT TO ALSO WELCOME CHIEF GREENE, I’M HAPPY TO SEE HIM GREENE, I’M HAPPY TO SEE HIM HERE AND LOOKING FORWARD TO HERE AND LOOKING FORWARD TO WORKING WITH HIM IN THE FUTURE. WORKING WITH HIM IN THE FUTURE. I’D LIKE TO THANK ALL OF THE I’D LIKE TO THANK ALL OF THE STAFF FOR PUTTING THIS AGENDA STAFF FOR PUTTING THIS AGENDA TOGETHER, ALL THE MATERIAL AND TOGETHER, ALL THE MATERIAL AND STREAMLINING THE PRESENTATIONS STREAMLINING THE PRESENTATIONS TO MAKE THEM VERY CLEAR AND MOVE TO MAKE THEM VERY CLEAR AND MOVE THIS WHAT LOOKED LIKE AN THIS WHAT LOOKED LIKE AN EIGHT-HOUR MEETING ALONG. EIGHT-HOUR MEETING ALONG. I’D ALSO LIKE TO THANK SARAH AND I’D ALSO LIKE TO THANK SARAH AND JUSTIN FOR SERVING THIS YEAR AND JUSTIN FOR SERVING THIS YEAR AND ENGAGING ALL OF US AND ENGAGING ALL OF US AND PARTICIPATING IN THE DECISIONS PARTICIPATING IN THE DECISIONS THE CITY HAS BEEN MAKING. THE CITY HAS BEEN MAKING. WE AS A WHOLE HAVE HAD SOME WE AS A WHOLE HAVE HAD SOME INPUT FOR. INPUT FOR. I DO WANT TO MAKE A LITTLE I DO WANT TO MAKE A LITTLE ANNOUNCEMENT ABOUT THE FOLSOM ANNOUNCEMENT ABOUT THE FOLSOM CITY ZOO AND IF YOU HAVEN’T BEEN CITY ZOO AND IF YOU HAVEN’T BEEN TO WILD NIGHTS AND HOLIDAY TO WILD NIGHTS AND HOLIDAY LIGHTS, THERE ARE TWO WEEKENDS LIGHTS, THERE ARE TWO WEEKENDS LEFT. LEFT. THERE’S FOUR DAYS IN A ROW, IT’S THERE’S FOUR DAYS IN A ROW, IT’S THE THURSDAY THROUGH SUNDAY OVER THE THURSDAY THROUGH SUNDAY OVER THE NIX TWO WEEKENDS SO THE THE NIX TWO WEEKENDS SO THE 11th, 12th, 13th AND 11th, 12th, 13th AND 14th, THE 18th, 19th, 21 14th, THE 18th, 19th, 21 AND 22nd. AND 22nd. THIS IS ONE OF THE MAJOR THIS IS ONE OF THE MAJOR FUNDRAISERS AND ONE OF THE MOST FUNDRAISERS AND ONE OF THE MOST FUN THINGS THAT HAPPENS AT THE FUN THINGS THAT HAPPENS AT THE ZOO TO TAKE YOU’RE FAMILIES TO. ZOO TO TAKE YOU’RE FAMILIES TO. THEY ARE CURRENTLY ALSO THEY ARE CURRENTLY ALSO UNDERTAKING A PROJECT TO RAISE UNDERTAKING A PROJECT TO RAISE THE FUNDS TO REPLACE THE THE FUNDS TO REPLACE THE VETERINARY TRAILER AND THEY WERE VETERINARY TRAILER AND THEY WERE ABLE TO RAISE ON GIVING TUESDAY ABLE TO RAISE ON GIVING TUESDAY AROUND $28,000, THE PROJECT WILL AROUND $28,000, THE PROJECT WILL COST SOMEWHERE AROUND 120 TO COST SOMEWHERE AROUND 120 TO $150,000 TO COMPLETE. $150,000 TO COMPLETE. SO YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION SO YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION ABOUT THOSE TWO ZOO-RELATED ABOUT THOSE TWO ZOO-RELATED THINGS ON THE FRIENDS OF FOLSOM THINGS ON THE FRIENDS OF FOLSOM ZOO ONLINE AND SIGN UP FOR ZOO ONLINE AND SIGN UP FOR ATTENDING THE WILD NIGHTS OR ATTENDING THE WILD NIGHTS OR DONATING TO THE ZOO TRAILER. DONATING TO THE ZOO TRAILER. FINALLY, I WAS ALSO APPOINTED TO FINALLY, I WAS ALSO APPOINTED TO A LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES A LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY POLICY ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY POLICY PROGRAM, WHICH IS SOMETHING THAT PROGRAM, WHICH IS SOMETHING THAT I’VE BEEN PASSIONATE ABOUT FOR I’VE BEEN PASSIONATE ABOUT FOR YEARS, AND THAT’S MAINTAINING YEARS, AND THAT’S MAINTAINING THE OPEN SPACES, A LOT OF THINGS THE OPEN SPACES, A LOT OF THINGS THAT PEOPLE COME TO FOLSOM FOR. THAT PEOPLE COME TO FOLSOM FOR. SO I’M LOOKING FORWARD TO SO I’M LOOKING FORWARD TO SERVING ON THAT THIS COMING YEAR SERVING ON THAT THIS COMING YEAR AS WELL. AS WELL. THANKS AGAIN THIS EVENING. THANKS AGAIN THIS EVENING. EVERYBODY HAVE A HAPPY HOLIDAY EVERYBODY HAVE A HAPPY HOLIDAY AND STAY SAFE. AND STAY SAFE. GREAT, THANK YOU. GREAT, THANK YOU. I ALSO WANT TO WELCOME CHIEF I ALSO WANT TO WELCOME CHIEF GREENE. GREENE. WE’RE HAPPY YOU’RE HERE. WE’RE HAPPY YOU’RE HERE. I ALSO WANT TO WELCOME LOOKS I ALSO WANT TO WELCOME LOOKS LIKE WE HAVE QUITE A FEW HIGH LIKE WE HAVE QUITE A FEW HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS IN THE AUDIENCE SCHOOL STUDENTS IN THE AUDIENCE TODAY WHO I HAVE A SNEAKING TODAY WHO I HAVE A SNEAKING SUSPICION WAITED TO THE LAST SUSPICION WAITED TO THE LAST MINUTE TO FULFILL THEIR AMERICAN MINUTE TO FULFILL THEIR AMERICAN GOVERNMENT REQUIREMENT TO ATTEND GOVERNMENT REQUIREMENT TO ATTEND AN IN-PERSON MEETING. AN IN-PERSON MEETING. BUT YOU MADE IT! BUT YOU MADE IT! AND THIS COULD HAVE BEEN A MUCH, AND THIS COULD HAVE BEEN A MUCH, MUCH LONGER MEETING, WE MADE IT MUCH LONGER MEETING, WE MADE IT GO VERY FAST SO YOU WOULDN’T GO VERY FAST SO YOU WOULDN’T HAVE TO BE HERE ALL NIGHT ON A HAVE TO BE HERE ALL NIGHT ON A SCHOOL NIGHT. SCHOOL NIGHT. WITH THAT, I WANT TO ADJOURN IN WITH THAT, I WANT TO ADJOURN IN MEMORY OF A LONG-TIME FOLSOM MEMORY OF A LONG-TIME FOLSOM RESIDENT WHO PASSED AWAY, RESIDENT WHO PASSED AWAY, BARBARA BAKER, WE’RE JOINED BY BARBARA BAKER, WE’RE JOINED BY SOME OF OUR FAMILY MEMBERS IN SOME OF OUR FAMILY MEMBERS IN THE CORNER. THE CORNER. BARBARA BAKER PASSED AWAY IN HER BARBARA BAKER PASSED AWAY IN HER HOME ON OCTOBER 15th AT THE HOME ON OCTOBER 15th AT THE AGE OF 99 AND FIVE MONTHS. AGE OF 99 AND FIVE MONTHS. SHE WAS BORN AND RAISED IN SHE WAS BORN AND RAISED IN FOLSOM. FOLSOM. SHE HAD FOND MEMORIES OF OLD SHE HAD FOND MEMORIES OF OLD STEAM TRAINS COMING THROUGH TOWN STEAM TRAINS COMING THROUGH TOWN AS THEY PASSED, SHE WAVED TO THE AS THEY PASSED, SHE WAVED TO THE CONDUCTOR IN THE CABOOSE WHO CONDUCTOR IN THE CABOOSE WHO THREW CANDY TO HER. THREW CANDY TO HER. SHE LIVED DURING THE GREAT SHE LIVED DURING THE GREAT DEPRESSION AND RECALLED HOBOS DEPRESSION AND RECALLED HOBOS SHOWING UP AT THE BACK DOOR OF SHOWING UP AT THE BACK DOOR OF HER HOME ASKING FOR WORK. HER HOME ASKING FOR WORK. HER MOTHER MADE SANDWICHES FOR HER MOTHER MADE SANDWICHES FOR THEM AND SENT THEM ON THEIR WAY. THEM AND SENT THEM ON THEIR WAY. THEY ATTENDED GRAMMAR SCHOOL AND THEY ATTENDED GRAMMAR SCHOOL AND REMEMBERED BEING TAUGHT IN CLASS REMEMBERED BEING TAUGHT IN CLASS TO SAVE MONEY. TO SAVE MONEY. EACH WEEK THE CHILDREN BROUGHT EACH WEEK THE CHILDREN BROUGHT IN THEIR PENNIES OR WHATEVER IN THEIR PENNIES OR WHATEVER CHANGE THEY HAD WHICH WAS THEN CHANGE THEY HAD WHICH WAS THEN DEPOSITED IN THE BANK OF AMERICA DEPOSITED IN THE BANK OF AMERICA ON SUTTER STREET. ON SUTTER STREET. BARBARA ATTENDED THE UNIVERSITY BARBARA ATTENDED THE UNIVERSITY OF THE PACIFIC AND THEN WENT ON OF THE PACIFIC AND THEN WENT ON TO NURSING SCHOOL AT UCLA. TO NURSING SCHOOL AT UCLA. SHE MET HER HUSBAND ROBERT BAKER SHE MET HER HUSBAND ROBERT BAKER WHILE ATTENDING A DANCE BETWEEN WHILE ATTENDING A DANCE BETWEEN THE NURSING STUDENTS AND LAW THE NURSING STUDENTS AND LAW STUDENTS FROM LOYOLA LAW SCHOOL. STUDENTS FROM LOYOLA LAW SCHOOL. SHE MARRIED ROBERT IN 1948 AND SHE MARRIED ROBERT IN 1948 AND THEY WERE MARRIED FOR 52 YEARS THEY WERE MARRIED FOR 52 YEARS UNTIL HIS DEATH IN 2000. UNTIL HIS DEATH IN 2000. IN THE 1960s, SHE ASSISTED HER IN THE 1960s, SHE ASSISTED HER HUSBAND WITH HIS REAL ESTATE HUSBAND WITH HIS REAL ESTATE BUSINESS ON SUTTER STREET. BUSINESS ON SUTTER STREET. SHE WILL BE REMEMBERED AS A SHE WILL BE REMEMBERED AS A STRONG, INDEPENDENT AND STRONG, INDEPENDENT AND HARDWORKING WOMAN WHO WAS SAVVY HARDWORKING WOMAN WHO WAS SAVVY IN THE BUSINESS WORLD. IN THE BUSINESS WORLD. HER GREATEST LEGACY WAS TO HER GREATEST LEGACY WAS TO PRESERVE THE MIRROR HOUSE IN PRESERVE THE MIRROR HOUSE IN FOLSOM. FOLSOM. SHE WILL BE GREATLY MISSED BY SHE WILL BE GREATLY MISSED BY HER CHILDREN, GRANDCHILDREN AND HER CHILDREN, GRANDCHILDREN AND GREAT-GRANDCHILDREN. GREAT-GRANDCHILDREN. SO TO BARBARA’S FAMILY, WE SEND SO TO BARBARA’S FAMILY, WE SEND YOU OUR DEEPEST SYMPATHIES. YOU OUR DEEPEST SYMPATHIES. WE THANK YOUR MOM FOR HER MANY WE THANK YOUR MOM FOR HER MANY CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE CITY OF CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE CITY OF FOLSOM AND WE WILL ADJOURN IN FOLSOM AND WE WILL ADJOURN IN MEMORY OF BARBARA BAKER AT MEMORY OF BARBARA BAKER AT 7:46 P.M. 7:46 P.M. THANK YOU VERY MUCH.